Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
New York City has been hit with a class action lawsuit alleging the speed cameras it uses to issue tickets violate state law.
Lead plaintiff, Abram Muladzhanov, alleges in his class action lawsuit that the City improperly assesses and collects fines for speeding based on speed cameras; however, the process for issuing violations using the speed cameras violates New York law.
Specifically, the NYC class action lawsuit states that the Notices of Liability sent to residents lack a certificate charging liability, signed to or affirmed by a technician. Muladzhanov alleges that the city is well aware of this requirement.
“Nevertheless, Defendants continue to issue legally insufficient Notices of Liability for alleged Speed Camera Violations without a certificate charging liability, signed to or affirmed by a technician employed by the City of New York,” alleges the NYC class action lawsuit.
The plaintiff says that he is just one of thousands who were issued insufficient notices and paid the fine assessed.
“The City is penalizing its citizens for allegedly violating the same law it chooses to ignore,” said the plaintiff’s attorney in a statement.
According to the NYC class action lawsuit, New York City implemented the automated speed enforcement program in 2013. The program started with 20 school zones throughout the city and then was expanded to 140 school zones.
“Speed Cameras” that use laser technology to capture images of vehicles going more than 10 miles per hour over the speed limit in these zones were installed. These cameras are repositioned and moved at regular intervals, says the plaintiff, and now encompass 875 school zones. If a vehicle is speeding, an image of the license plate is taken and the driver is issued a $50 fine that is mailed to them.
“Images and recorded speeds of offending vehicles are reviewed for accuracy by a New York City Department of Transportation (‘DOT’) technician. If a DOT technician verifies that a Speed Camera Violation occurred, the DOT issues and mails a Notice of Liability to the registered owner of the vehicle,” points out the NYC class action.
New York City fails to include documentation that a technician has reviewed the speed camera footage, however. This documentation is required under New York law, alleges the class action, and failure to include the documentation invalidates the charge and fine.
Nearly 3 million Notices of Liability have been issued using the speed cameras, says the NYC class action lawsuit, and $122,674,189 in fines have been collected from 2014 until 2016. In addition to the fines, those issued a Notice of Liability must also pay fees and/or postage to remit the fine. The plaintiff argues that these Notices and resulting fines are invalid because of the missing certification from a technician.
“At all relevant times, Defendants were aware that Plaintiff’s and Class members’ Notices of Liability for alleged Speed Camera Violations were patently invalid as they did not contain a certificate charging liability, signed to or affirmed by a technician employed by the City of New York,” alleges the NYC class action lawsuit.
The class action lawsuit seeks to recover damages on behalf of all individuals who received a New York City speed camera ticket between August 30, 2013 and the present and paid the mandated fine.
The plaintiff is represented by Israel Klein and Brittany Weiner of Imbesi Law PC.
The New York City Speed Camera Class Action Lawsuit is Abram Muladzhanov v. The City of New York, et al., Case No. 18-cv-00930, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
42 thoughts onNYC Class Action Claims Speed Camera Tickets are Invalid
Please add me to this law suit. School zone is school zone, and not for misuse for general traffic speed fines outside school operations time. This is nothing but a way to grab money from law obiding citizens.
I received a speeding violation on a vehicle with a NY license, and my plate is from PA. They denied my appeal.
I am interested. Received a speeding violation on a vehicle with a NY license, and my plate is from PA. They denied my appeal.
As a teacher, i find it offensive that our students’ safety is being used (fraudulently, imo) as an excuse to take people’s money who are driving safely and not overly fast at midnight on a Sunday in July. Failure to fill out paperwork is the least of this program’s faults.
Please add me , I got school zone tix on New Years Day This is my third speed cam tix. This is nothing but a money grab
from Car owners, This city is anti car it needs to be adressed
Please add me to this suit
i have tickets zero notary one from last week and i wasn’t speeding one from two years before and before they changed the rule to 24/7 it was a holiday ar 2 am i was going normal speed zone there are others if we are going back to aug 31 2013 ive king suspected foul play
Please add me to this suit! Im paying but this is ridiculous.
Just got a notice that my ticket will not be dismissed even though they can’t tell me where the school was that was supposedly near the camera. Sign me up.
On April 15th (good Friday) 2022, the speed camera caught my vehicle doing 37miles, 12 above the speed limit 25miles in a school zone. The catch is there is no school quarter of a mile in any direction of this street, no signs that was a school zone. Please add my name to this class action suit