Sarah Gilbert  |  June 11, 2014

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Keurig coffee brewerUPDATE 2: Sept. 30, 2020, Keurig agreed to a $31 million class action settlement to resolve claims that the company monopolized the single-serve coffee pod market.

UPDATE: On Nov. 29, 2017, Keurig Green Mountain will continue to face multiple claims of anticompetitive behavior, following a judge’s denial of the company’s motion to dismiss.


A new Keurig coffee brewer expected to be launched later this year has sparked a flurry of class action lawsuits from consumers who accuse Keurig Green Mountain Inc. of engaging in anticompetitive behavior to stifle the competition.

A total of eight class action lawsuits that allege Keurig plotted to monopolize the market for single-serve coffee packs were centralized in New York federal court last week by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).

U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick of the Southern District of New York will preside over the consolidated Keurig antitrust class action lawsuit, which could include up to 17 additional “tag-along” class actions, the JPML said in its June 3 Order.

Plaintiffs in the Keurig class action lawsuit list a number of alleged anticompetitive practices they claim the single-serve coffeemaker has engaged in, including acquiring its competitors to eliminate their competing business; negotiating and entering into exclusive agreements with suppliers and distributors so other coffeemakers could not enter the market; engaging in what plaintiffs call “sham patent infringement litigation”; and redesigning the company’s product so it will allegedly “lock-out” other coffeemaker’s single serve packets.

The JPML determined that the eight Keurig class action lawsuits and many of the potential tag-along cases had common factual allegations. The panel wrote, “[a]ll of the actions… raise virtually identical factual questions concerning the conduct of Keurig Green Mountain Inc., and its predecessors in allegedly monopolizing the market for single-serve coffee cups used in Keurig brewing machines. Additionally, most of the complaints challenge defendant’s alleged plans to introduce a product redesign later this year…”

The Keurig class action lawsuit cases involve three proposed Classes: direct purchasers, indirect purchasers, and competitors. While the direct purchasers and indirect purchasers have nearly identical claims, the competitors of Keurig were less enthusiastic about consolidation, according to the filing. The panel wrote, however, “[w]hile we agree that these actions present some individualized factual issues, the existence of such issues does not negate the common ones.”

“On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that the [Keurig class action lawsuits] involve common questions of fact, and that centralization will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation.”

Keurig’s single-serve coffee brewing machine, like that of its major competitor, Tassimo, uses single-serve coffee packs that can only fit its machines, and use of the machine requires that consumers also purchase single-serve coffee packs produced by Keurig partners, called K-cups. The industry term for these coffee brewers is a “closed brewing system,” meaning that it is closed to any coffee, tea or other hot beverage brand not specifically produced in partnership with the manufacturer. In fact, Keurig was the first company to use the closed brewing system model for the home brewing market.

While existing models of the Keurig brewing system could be “hacked,” and competitors could simply produce cups that were the same size and shape as K-cups with their own product inside, the new brewing system in the works would use so-called “digital rights management,” or DRM, the same technology that limits whether DVDs can be played on machines outside the country of origin; prevents Amazon e-book downloads from being read on other devices; and once limited iTunes songs to play on Apple devices. The new machine would only accept Keurig-licensed K-cups.

The Keurig Coffee Monopoly Class Action Lawsuit is In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2542, in U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


72 thoughts onKeurig Coffee Monopoly Class Action Lawsuits Consolidated

  1. Connie Rash says:

    I have been using Keurig for years and want to be added in the lawsuit.

  2. Kevin says:

    Please add me.Been purchasing this brand of k-cups for years

  3. Angelica Romero says:

    Add me

  4. Marlon Romero says:

    Add me

  5. Ellen Thompson says:

    Have been using Keurig for a long time. Still happy with its service.

  6. Sue cooper says:

    I have been keurig forever please add me to lawsuit

  7. Maurizio Palombi says:

    Please add me

  8. Dorothea Ciardella says:

    PLEASE ADD ME

  9. Linda Szymoniak says:

    I found that I could only use Keurig coffee pods in my Keurig 2 so have been limited as to what I can buy that will work in my unit. How do I get involved in this class action lawsuit?

1 5 6 7

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.