Sarah Mirando  |  May 19, 2011

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Oreck Halo vacuumA federal class action lawsuit has been filed against Oreck Corporation for allegedly lying about the germ-killing capabilities of its ultraviolet Oreck Halo vacuum and ProShield Air Purifier. Oreck settled similar allegations brought by the Federal Trade Commission in April, which accused Oreck of making false and deceptive health claims regarding these products.

The Oreck class action lawsuit takes aim at the Oreck Halo vacuum, which generates ultraviolet light onto the floor while vacuuming, and the ProShield Plus, a portable air cleaner that filters air particles using an electrostatic charge. The Halo retails for $599.95, while the ProShield Plus costs as much as $399.95.

According to the Oreck Halo vacuum class action lawsuit, Oreck aggressively advertised and marketed the Halo vacuum’s ability to “kill and reduce virtually all bacteria, viruses, germs, mold and allergens that exist on carpets and floor surfaces,” including the flu and common cold. An infomercial for the Oreck Halo claimed that it has been tested and shown to kill up to 99.9% of bacteria, certain common germs, and dangerous pathogens like E. coli and MRSA. Oreck also advertised that its ProShield Plus “captures and destroys many airborne viruses like the flu.”

These claims are unsubstantiated, however, and Oreck used them to justify charging consumers a substantial premium for the “germ killing” products, the class action lawsuit says.

Oreck agreed to pay the government $750,000 last month to resolve FTC charges that it made false and deceptive health claims regarding its Halo vacuum and ProShield Plus air cleaner products. Oreck also agreed to stop making claims that its appliances were scientifically proven to reduce the risk of flu and other illnesses, and eliminate virtually all common germs and allergens.

The Oreck Halo Class Action Lawsuit is Ruscitti v. Oreck Corporation, Case No. 1:11-cv-03121.

Did you buy an Oreck Halo vacuum or an Oreck ProShield Plus Air Cleaner? The attorneys working this case want to hear from you NOW! Go the Oreck Class Action Lawsuit page for more information.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


2 thoughts onOreck Halo Vacuum Class Action Lawsuit

  1. Paul Damian says:

    It’s a shame as the Halo Vacuum is the best vac I’ve ever had! 10 years and it just keeps on going like a tank!!!

  2. Mike Tinsley says:

    I never received anything letter or nothing and as of today I spent over a thousand dollars putting in theses helicoils to be told if they do it again I need a new engine.
    So I’m very pissed off ar the fact there is or was a deadline . That’s bull shit .
    50.00$ checks for a 500 dollar repair. Tell you what I rather meet at the flag pole.
    Ford and everyone behind this should be held accountable .
    I need some sort of restoration is there a wa to reopen because not everyone was informed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.