Jessy Edwards  |  October 15, 2021

Category: Auto News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

progressive lawsuit, progressive class action
(Photo Credit: Ken Wolter/Shutterstock)

Progressive Claims Class Action Lawsuit Overview: 

  • Who: A policyholder has lodged a class action lawsuit against Progressive Mountain Insurance Company and Mitchell International, Inc. 
  • Why: The plaintiffs claim Progressive applies baseless adjustments to decrease the value determination for vehicles deemed a total loss.
  • Where: The class action lawsuit is pending in a Georgia federal court.

Insurance provider Progressive conspired with the company that values its automobile property damage loss claims to illegally decrease the amount it pays its policyholders for vehicles deemed total losses, a new class action lawsuit alleges.

Plaintiff Keddrick Brown filed the class action complaint against Progressive Mountain Insurance Company and Mitchell International, Inc. Oct. 11 in a Georgia federal court, alleging the companies made arbitrary deductions when assessing claims for totaled vehicles.

Brown says, when Progressive is assessing a claim for a vehicle deemed a “total loss,” it sends the claim to Mitchell, which then sends back a valuation report with deductions to the value of the car which are “arbitrary and unexplained.”

Specifically, Mitchell makes what it calls a “Project Sold Adjustment” deduction. First, it looks at the comparable prices to replace a car of that make and model. And then it reduces the amount a policyholder is to get in its unexplained “Project Sold Adjustment.”

When looking at the fine print of the report, Brown says he realized the deduction was an adjustment made “to reflect consumer purchasing behavior (negotiating a different price than the listed price).” 

Brown argues that Mitchell should not be allowed to simply reduce the price he and others are paid out by estimating how much would be taken off the value of the car through people trying to negotiate the price down.

In his case, Mitchell and Progressive reduced the amount he was paid out after his 2014 Dodge Charger was totaled in May 2021 by $830.50. The payout was reduced due to Mitchell’s “arbitrary” Project Sold Adjustment, he says. 

“By aiding Progressive’s violation of Georgia law and its breach of its contractual duties with its insureds, Mitchell has interfered with the contractual relationship between Progressive and Progressive’s insureds and has engaged in a civil conspiracy with Progressive to artificially reduce the claims payments to Progressive insureds. 

He’s looking to represent anyone living in Georgia who made a total loss claim with Progressive in the past six years. Brown is suing for breach of contract and interference with contractual relations, and seeking certification of the class action damages, an injunction, and a jury trial.

This case follows another similar case filed in Pennsylvania this week. In that case, Progressive is accused of systematically lowering the cash value of loss vehicles in Pennsylvania by applying erroneous adjustments in order to pay less for total loss claims. 

Are you a policyholder who has had a “Projected Sold Adjustment” applied to your Progressive claim for a total loss vehicle? Let us know in the comments! 

The plaintiff is represented by R. Brent Irby of Irby Law, LLC and William Greg Dobson of Lober & Dobson, LLC.

The Progressive Mountain Insurance Total Loss Adjustments Class Action Lawsuit is Keddrick Brown et al., v. Progressive Mountain Insurance Company, Case No. 3:21-cv-00175-TCB, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

51 thoughts onProgressive Schemed With Mitchell to Reduce Payouts for Total Loss Cars, Class Action Alleges

  1. David Dunn says:

    Currently am disputing totaled pay out offer from Progressive who confirmed has used the Mitchell Valuation in determining vehicle value. Claims adjuster is off by $4000-$5000 in order to replace with comparable vehicle which is what is stated in the policy.
    Any advice would be appreciated.

  2. jennifer bealer says:

    I am dealing with progressive right now, they totaled my Element just based on photos, i fought them on it , they said they do not send people out to look at cars anymore, after 2 days they again said it was totaled, so i went and leased a new car. 4 days after that they said they would fix it! i can’t return the lease so they again totaled it and are low balling me on the pay out. I am in Denver CO. and would love to be a part of this law suite.

  3. Walter Brown says:

    Yes I also have total loss car. And I was insure by progressive. And still am. My accident was on 01/07/2021

  4. Arielle says:

    This happened to me in ky..need attorney to represent..please

  5. Chase says:

    Dealing with the same thing I Oregon. I wrecked my diesel truck and they sent me 2 vehicles for comps one was 130 miles away and another was a gas truck not even a diesel. I found at least 8 actually comparable trucks closer to me and when I average out their values I come out with a $5,000 difference between those comps and what Progressive is trying get me to settle on.

  6. Adam norris says:

    Have emails showing progressives projected sold adjustment and other adjustments that they can’t explain to me for my total loss

  7. Adam norris says:

    Dealing with same thing. I know a good bit about trucks and there comparable vehicles aren’t remotely comparable, I sent them 6 vehicle listing, with my exact truck, same trim, same engine, same color and withing 75miles of me and the respond saying non are comparable at all..

  8. Tim Smith says:

    I am also dealing with this in Oregon. Who really knows if the comparables they used really ever existed. They are all 60+ miles away. I found one that is 2 miles away and they rejected it. Now there plan is to have Mitchell reach out to some local dealers and provide them with my vin and ask what they would list it at. I already know that its a scam. Anyone else have them suggest that??

    1. Chase says:

      I’m going through the same thing here in Oregon and I’m curious to see if they’re going to want to do that with me. How did that turn out for you?

  9. Heidi Isbell says:

    I am going through the same issue here in Missouri.

  10. Kelli paulson says:

    I’m going thru the same in oregon Mitchel had 4 comps that weren’t even the same vehical said they were within 50 miles of me there is no town within 50 miles of me when I sent comparable comps that were the same vehical they anyone can ask any price its what they sell for Mitchel decreased my value by thousands of dollars

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.