Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
A class action lawsuit claims that Purell is falsely advertised as being protective against diseases such as the flu, MRSA and Ebola.
The Purell false advertising class action lawsuit was filed by Cliff Jurkiewicz who says he travels frequently, and purchases Purell hand sanitizers to help protect him from germs he may encounter.
However, he alleges that he was falsely led to believe that the products were able to fight certain diseases.
Jurkiewicz claims that he and many other customers were financially injured by the misrepresentations, because had they known that the product could not fight germs as advertised, they would not have purchased it.
Jurkiewicz explains that he has purchased the products regularly since 2006. He says that to make his purchasing decisions, he researched Purell’s products and read advertisements. Allegedly, he decided to buy Purell because it was advertised as being able to kill germs.
Specifically, he says he purchased Purell products that bore the slogan “Kills more than 99.99% of all Germs.”
According to the Purell class action lawsuit, germs are made up of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa. Allegedly, Purell’s statement implies that the product kills 99.9 percent of bacteria and viruses.
The Purell class action lawsuit then goes on to say that because Purell claims its products kill 99.99 percent of bacteria and viruses, the products reduce illness and disease.
However, Jurkiewicz’s Purell class action lawsuit argues that this is not the case. Allegedly, there is no evidence that Purell prevents diseases or reduces illness.
Jurkiewicz notes that the FDA stated that there is no evidence suggesting that “killing or decreasing the number of bacteria or viruses on the skin by a certain magnitude produces a corresponding clinical reduction in infection or disease caused by such bacteria or virus.”
The Purell class action lawsuit asserts that Purell’s advertising campaign has relied on scaring people about the flu and other diseases, and then providing consumers with what appears to be a solution to flu exposure.
Allegedly, Purell advertises its hand sanitizers as an alternative when soap and water are not available, or recommends that hand sanitizer be used in addition to soap and water.
Reportedly, Purell allows users to form an association between the words “flu” and “Purell” and “consumers reach the inference that Purell must prevent and reduce the flu and other viruses based on the wording and images used.”
Jurkiewicz explains that in January 2020, the FDA sent a warning letter requesting that Purell stop advertising its hand sanitizers as effective in preventing diseases, because the messaging is misleading to consumers.
According to the FDA, hand sanitizer is just a topical antiseptic, and does not have the advertised disease reduction capacities. The FDA then said that the claims made by Purell amount to claims made about a new drug, for which the FDA had not given approval.
Customers have previously taken issue with the same advertising, and have filed another class action lawsuit over the advertising.
Do you use Purell? Let us know in the comments section below.
Jurkiewicz is represented by W.B. Markovits and Terence R. Coates of Markovits Stock & DeMarco LLC; David J. George and Lori G. Feldman of George Gesten McDonald PLLC; and Mark Morrison of Morrison & Associates.
The Purell Disease Prevention False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit is Cliff Jurkiewicz v. Gojo Industries Inc., et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-00279-BYP, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
191 thoughts onPurell Class Action Says Hand Sanitizer Can’t Prevent Serious Diseases
Yes. Purell was my Number One choice over the past years, even before this Pandemic
Please add my name to this lawsuit I use this all day
Please Add Me
PLEASE ADD
This is so upsetting, I’m a mother of 3 & purell isn’t the cheapest brand. I’m disappointed that it’s so misleading by the advertisement. I have purell in my house as I am just finding this out. Please ass me as well
My partner was diagnosed with heart failure after going in for covid test March 16th this year. They gave us both chest xrays, ct scans, ekg, MRI, influenza a and b test as well as the covid test. We have purchased purell and payed 10x the retail price on Amazon and any other local shops as the dr recommended us to purchase as it was safe and guaranteed to kill covid.
I have used Purell for many, many years. Please add me.
please add me
please add me
Please add me
Add me I use this alot because of my respiratory issues and allergies and ive purchased plenty of these bottles for my kids to use while at school on the bus or when theyre outside