Christina Spicer  |  May 16, 2019

Category: Food

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

cans of StarKist tunaClass action lawsuits have been filed against three major canned tuna producers alleging the companies trick consumers into thinking the products are “Dolphin Safe.”

According to three separate class action lawsuits, Nestle Purina Petcare Co., StarKist Co., and Bumble Bee Foods LLC label their products as “Dolphin Safe,” but in reality they use suppliers whose fishing practices endanger the marine mammals.

These companies then skirt compliance with regulators, while telling consumers that they use fishing practices that preserve dolphins, the plaintiffs claim.

The production and manufacture of canned tuna and tuna products came under fire in the 1990s after the public became concerned about the effect of fishing practices on dolphin populations.

According to the plaintiffs, the use of synthetic fishing nets caused millions of dolphins to perish as “unintended bycatch.”

After an activist captured a video of fishers deliberately encircling both tuna and dolphins, hauling the whole catch in and killing the dolphins as a result, there was a worldwide outcry over tuna fishing methods.

As a result, companies began labeling their products as “Dolphin Safe” and touting their improved fishing practices, specifically the pole-and-line method.

“In the ensuing 25 years, U.S. tuna sellers, led by StarKist, implemented a widespread and long-term marketing campaign that continues to this day – representing to consumers that no dolphins were killed or harmed in capturing their tuna, as well as expressing their commitment to sustainably sourcing tuna,” alleges the StarKist class action lawsuit. “StarKist tuna, however, is not dolphin-safe. Nor is it sustainably sourced. StarKist’s dolphin-safe representations are false, misleading, and/or deceptive.”

The tuna class action lawsuits claim that the companies have been sourcing their products from suppliers who use fishing techniques that harm dolphins. The plaintiffs say that the companies have been obscuring regulatory reports and public concern over harmful tuna fishing practices through many layers of confusing business entities.

The specific allegations against Bumble Bee Foods include sourcing its non-premium products from companies that use fishing practices that harm dolphins.

The StarKist class action lawsuit claims that the company sources its tuna from fishers using illegal methods.

While the Purina class action lawsuit claims the company labels its Fancy Feast brand of cat food as “Dolphin Safe,” but uses companies that catch tuna using techniques that hurt or kill the marine mammals.

The plaintiffs in all three class action lawsuits are represented by Patricia N. Syverson and Manfred P. Muecke, Elaine A. Ryan and Carrie A. Laliberte of Bonnet Fairbourn Friedman & Balint PC, Brian D. Penny of Goldman Scarlato & Penny PC, Brian M. Brown of Zaremba Brown PLLC, and Stuart A. Davidson, Christopher C. Gold and Bradley M. Beall of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.

The “Dolphin Safe” Canned Tuna Class Action Lawsuits are Lori Myers, et al. v. Nestle Purina Petcare Company, Case No. 5:19-­cv-­00898, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Duggan, et al. v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Case No. 4:19­-cv-­02564, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and Gardner, et al. v. Starkist Co., Case No. 4:19­-cv-­02561, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

UPDATE: On Aug. 16, 2019, Bumble Bee Foods asked a federal judge to toss a class action over their “dolphin safe” tuna labeling, arguing that federal law prevails here.

UPDATE 2: On Feb. 3, 2020, in a motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit, StarKist says that consumers do not expect their “dolphin safe” canned tuna labels to mean that the marine mammals are completely safe from fishing practices used to harvest the popular seafood.  

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


789 thoughts onTuna Class Actions Lodged Over Fishy ‘Dolphin Safe’ Labeling

  1. Tiffany says:

    Add me I eat all of the brand tuna all the time

  2. Teri Mathews says:

    Please add me

  3. jody ezell says:

    ADD me

  4. Ramona perham says:

    sad, my family eats this all the time,this is not surprising with there fishing ways

  5. Jen says:

    Please add me

  6. nadine johnson says:

    add me

  7. Igena Cooter says:

    Please add me.. I buy that tuna all the time . We eat tuna sandwiches about 3x a month.

  8. Roberta Johnston says:

    Add me please

1 76 77 78

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.