Jessy Edwards  |  November 28, 2022

Category: Cellphones

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Close up of Verizon signage on exterior of a building.
(Photo Credit: Victoria Ditkovsky/Shutterstock)

Update: 

  • Verizon Wireless asked a judge to force arbitration in a class action case alleging it advertises a flat-rate monthly plan but then jacks up that rate with hidden “administrative charges” at the end of the month.
  • In a memo in support of a motion to compel arbitration filed by Verizon’s attorneys Nov. 18 in a New Jersey federal court, the wireless telecommunications provider argued that its customers agreed to an arbitration clause when purchasing cell phones and accepting Verizon’s customer agreement.
  • By signing the document, Verizon claims customers gave up any right to bring a claim in court and said any dispute must be resolved through arbitration. It added that its customer agreement forbids collective action.

Verizon class action overview: 

  • Who: A group of Verizon Wireless consumers are suing the company.
  • Why: They say Verizon advertises a flat-rate monthly wireless plan then tacks on hidden fees at the end of the month.
  • Where: The Verizon class action lawsuit was filed in a New Jersey federal court. 

(Sept. 21, 2022)

Verizon Wireless advertises a flat-rate monthly plan but deceives customers by then jacking up that rate with hidden “administrative charges” at the end of the month, a new class action lawsuit alleges.

The plaintiffs, who are 26 Verizon Wireless customers, filed the class action lawsuit against Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications Inc. Sept. 20 in a New Jersey federal court, alleging violations of state and federal consumer laws.

According to the lawsuit, Verizon’s sign-up policies and practices deceive customers by prominently advertising certain flat monthly rates for Verizon postpaid wireless service plans. 

After customers sign up, however, Verizon allegedly charges them higher monthly rates than it advertises and promises by padding customers’ bills each month with what is called an “Administrative Charge”—currently $3.30 per month for each line.

Verizon class action claims hidden rates increase over time

According to the Verizon class action, the “administrative charge” is a fictitious construct that enables Verizon to unlawfully charge its customers more per month for wireless services without having to advertise the higher monthly rates.

The plaintiffs say the company first began “sneaking” the charge into all of its postpaid wireless customers’ bills in 2005, initially at a rate of $0.40 per month for each phone line on its customers’ service plans. 

“Since then, Verizon has repeatedly increased the amount of the Administrative Charge on a regular basis,” they say. 

The current amount of the administrative charge is $3.30 per line per month—more than eight-times the original amount of the charge, the Verizon class action alleges.

“Verizon has used the Administrative Charge as a revenue lever to covertly jack up its monthly service prices and to squeeze its existing subscribers for more cash whenever Verizon desires,” the lawsuit states. “To date, Verizon has improperly collected billions of dollars in additional, unlawful charges from the proposed Class members through its Administrative Charge scheme.”

As a result, the plaintiffs ask the court to stop Verizon from continuing the charge and to declare that the conduct is illegal, plus damages, fees, costs and a jury trial. 

They’re suing for unjust enrichment, breach of fair dealing and violation of state consumer laws in New York, Washington, Oregon, New Mexico, Hawaii and Florida. They’re looking to represent classes of consumers from those states who had the charge applied to their flat-rate plans.

Meanwhile, a number of class action lawsuits involving T-Mobile and Verizon have been filed, litigated or settled recently over allegations revolving around their accessibility, billing and service. Click here for more on these lawsuits.

Were you impacted by a Verizon plan rate change? Let us know your experience in the comments! 

The plaintiffs are represented by Stephen P. DeNittis, Joseph A. Osefchen and Shane T. Prince of DeNittis Osefchen Prince PC, Daniel M. Hattis and Paul Karl Lukacs of Hattis & Lukacs; and Michael E. Criden and Lindsey C. Grossman of Criden & Love PA.

The Verizon class action lawsuit is Corsi et al. v. Cellco Partnership et al., Case No. 3:22-cv-04621, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

1,157 thoughts onVerizon seeks arbitration in alleged deceptive plan rate class action

  1. Herb A Darsee says:

    verizon told us our phone bill would be lower if we switched to a new phone, and said we would receive $700.00 in discount for taking the new plan, discount would be paid out monthly on our bill, as of this date we have not seen any of that $700 and our bill went up due to fees added on.

  2. Sherry M Campbell says:

    The fees that they tack on are excessive and ridiculous

  3. Joan Kopinski says:

    I had a plan that was locked in fee. Added $6

  4. Vera says:

    Add me they hdiubled billed me continuously every month add on services I didn’t want charged me an 1.99 administrative fee when I first became customer plus continually allowed someone or their company to pull my credit for a year for different services although they knew I never called in for new services

  5. Heather says:

    Add me

  6. Toni Regan says:

    I have Verizon and have for many years. I have NEVER chosen to insure my phones yet it keeps getting added to my bill. They remove it when I call but never credit back the charges.

  7. Johnika Howard says:

    The fees that they tack on are excessive and ridiculous to put it mildly!

  8. Teri Ann Stevens says:

    Verizon is a very deceitful company. They are liars!

  9. JJ says:

    Add me too please

  10. Dalit Cohen says:

    I have Verizon

1 2 3 102

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.