Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Maybelline makeup contains oil despite advertisements that the products are oil-free, according to a recent class action lawsuit.
According to plaintiff Norah Flaherty, Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless foundation, Maybelline Fit Me Concealer and L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte foundation products all contain oils.
Consumers might seek out oil-free makeup products to suit their skin’s needs. For consumers with dry skin, oil in products could help nourish their skin and help any makeup look healthy and skin-like. However, for people with oily or combination skin, avoiding oil in makeup products can be vital to ensuring their makeup stays in place throughout the day. Other consumers may choose to avoid makeup with oil to prevent clogged pores and breakouts.
To match their skin’s needs, consumers like Flaherty allegedly purchased L’Oreal and Maybelline makeup products that were marketed as oil-free. Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless foundation, Maybelline Fit Me Concealer and L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte foundation products reportedly fall into this category.
Despite these representations, the products allegedly contain oil ingredients.
Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless foundation reportedly contains tocopherol and isododecane. Maybelline Fit Me Concealer similarly contains tocopherol and hydrogenated polysiobutene, according to Flaherty. L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte foundation also allegedly contains tocopherol acetate.
Although these ingredients may not immediately stand out as oils, Flaherty contends the ingredients are revealed to be oils based on their chemical structures.
For example, tocopherol is commonly known as vitamin C and reportedly contains several “functional groups” that result in the chemical being a “polar oil.” The other ingredients listed in the Maybelline makeup class action lawsuit allegedly have similar properties — all qualifying them as oils.
Flaherty argues that she and other consumers would not have purchased the Maybelline makeup if they were aware the products contained oils.
As a result of Maybelline and L’Oréal’s deception, Flaherty and other customers were allegedly financially injured by overpaying for the products.
Even worse, Flaherty contends, they were “deprived of their protected interest to choose the type and quality of products they use on their bodies.”
Maybelline and parent company L’Oréal allegedly knew their products contained oil ingredients but nonetheless decided to market their makeup as oil-free.
Flaherty says Maybelline and L’Oréal chose to market their products as oil-free despite their knowledge because they did not think customers like Flaherty would be able to tell the difference between oil and non-oil ingredients.
“On information and belief, Defendants through their employees did know that the Products contained oils, but chose to include ‘oil-free’ labeling because they did not believe their customers were well educated enough to know the difference,” the Maybelline makeup class action lawsuit contends.
Flaherty seeks to represent a Class of consumers who purchased Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless foundation, Maybelline Fit Me Concealer and L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte foundation products within the last four years. She also seeks to represent a subclass of consumers from Illinois who purchased the products within the last 10 years.
On behalf of herself and the proposed Class Members, Flaherty seeks injunctive relief, monetary relief, court costs and attorneys’ fees.
Did you purchase Maybelline makeup? Did you think the products were free of oil? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.
Flaherty and the proposed Class Members are represented by Todd M. Friedman, Steven G. Perry and David B. Levin of The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman PC.
The Maybelline Makeup Oil Class Action Lawsuit is Norah Flaherty v. Maybelline LLC, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-0724, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
516 thoughts onMaybelline Makeup Not Oil-Free as Advertised, Class Action Lawsuit Claims
please add me
Please yes, please add me
Please add me
I bought them believing they were oil free.
Please add me
Please add me
Please add me. I have used Clinique almost exclusively for 40 years. Some L’Oreal and Bare Minerals. Recently my eyes have been swelling up, (I have pictures). Now I know why!
I have used L’Oréal, Bare Minerals, Nutrogenia and especially Clinique. They have repeatedly caused irritation and breakouts. Clinique eye cream caused my eyes to swell. Their “oil. Free” makeup remover… safe for eyes did the same.
I grew up using Maybelline and we as consumers believe that were not being deceived information wise just to make a buck!
I went from 20+years using brand to switching to alternative brand.
I have seeping sores on my face from Fit Maybelline makeup, I wondered about the sores on my face, they really hurt, come to find out, it’s from my makeup! Plz help
My face is all broke out with Rosacea from Maybeline Oil Free, that has now been oroven to have oul in their FIT foundation.. Please add me.
Please add me
Add me