Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
USDA Baby Formula Shortage Contracts Overview:
- Who: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) urges state agencies, Rickett Mead Johnson (RMJ) and Gerber to be flexible on their infant formula contracts.
- Why: The USDA wants to help alleviate the baby formula shortage by having states contracted with RMJ and Gerber to all WIC participants to purchase alternate brands.
- Where: The baby formula shortage is nationwide.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture asked state agencies, Rickett Mead Johnson (RMJ) and Gerber to consider being flexible with their baby formula contracts in the midst of the current shortage.
With the temporary flexibility, WIC participants would be able to purchase alternate “sizes, forms or brands” of infant formula that would otherwise be unavailable to them, according to a USDA press release.
“Responding to the infant formula shortage has been — and will continue to be — a team effort. We encourage states and their formula manufacturers to work together to maximize access to infant formula for WIC participants, and USDA will provide the funding to make that possible,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in the release.
The USDA said it will use funds through the newly signed Access to Baby Formula Act to cover any additional costs for alternate infant formulas that would otherwise be unavailable in states contracted with RMJ and Gerber.
Abbott Nutrition covers the cost difference in states it contracts with, according to the USDA.
“WIC families are depending on us for the vital nourishment their babies and children need to thrive. We cannot let them down,” Vilsack said in the press release.
Abbott Contracts With About Half of U.S. States, USDA Says
The USDA estimates WIC participants under 12 months old consume about 56% of all infant formula in the United States and about half of U.S. states contract with Abbott.
Abbott voluntarily recalled several of its baby formula products in February.
While no Gerber or RMJ products were recalled, the USDA says states contracted with the two companies are starting to struggle with obtaining access to their typical supply of baby formula as Abbott’s manufacturing plant in Sturgis, Michigan, remains closed.
Abbott’s Sturgis plant was closed in February as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted an investigation into the source of a contamination of salmonella and Cronobacter sakazakii.
Abbott reached an agreement with the FDA earlier this month to reopen the Sturgis plant and has a planned reopening date of June 4.
Have you been affected by the current nationwide formula shortage? Let us know in the comments!
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- FTC Launches Baby Formula Shortage Inquiry, Seeks Public Input
- Biden Invokes Defense Production Act To Increase Baby Formula Production, Shipment
- Abbott Nutrition Reaches Deal With FDA To Reopen Baby Formula Plant Amid Shortage
- FDA Works To Increase Availability of Baby, Specialty Formulas Amid Abbott Investigation
6 thoughts onUSDA to Temporarily Cover Full Cost of Alternate Baby Formulas for WIC Participants
Add me
It is beyond ridiculous that WIC isn’t providing formula for infants. All stores should accept WIC. Most stores raised the cost of milk tremendously to profit hand over fist due to the storage. A box of twenty four bottles of Similac in Sam’s Club is $51 with tax as opposed to $36 several months ago and Target wants $16 for four bottles. No one returns phone calls for WIC offices. What are mothers to do when their children cannot be fed?
Please add me
I’ve had to buy several cans of the formula
I’ve had to buy several cans of milk out-of-pocket that wasn’t covered by my grandson’s WIC. Please include.
Please include me