Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
This settlement is closed!
Please see what other class action settlements you might qualify to claim cash from in our Open Settlements directory!
Carter-Reed Company LLC and other defendants have agreed to settle a class action lawsuit related to allegedly misleading labeling and advertising of Relacore products. If you purchased Relacore products since Jan. 1, 2000, you may be entitled to a cash payment from the class action settlement.
The Relacore class action lawsuit alleged the defendants made false and misleading statements in their advertising and labeling of Relacore products, in violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and other laws.
Relacore was marketed as a belly-fat reduction and weight loss supplement that reduced anxiety and improved mood. However, according to the Relacore class action lawsuit, there is no scientific proof that the product has the advertised benefits.
The defendants deny any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the Relacore class action lawsuit to avoid the expense and risk of trial.
Who’s Eligible
You are a Class Member of the Relacore settlement if you purchased Relacore, Relacore Extra, Relacore PM and/or the Relacore System in the United States for personal use (not for resale) between Jan. 1, 2000 and Nov. 10, 2014.
Potential Award
Up to $28.
Class Members who submit valid and timely claims will be eligible to receive $14 per bottle purchased during the Class Period, up to a maximum of two bottles per household.
Proof of Purchase
None required. However, Class Members who do not provide a valid receipt or credit card statement showing that they purchased the Relacore products during the Class Period must provide a declaration saying, under the penalty of perjury, that they purchased the Relacore products.
Claim Form Deadline
3/12/2015
Case Name
Lee v. Carter-Reed Company LLC, Case No. UNN-L-3969-04, in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County
Final Hearing
4/2/2015
Settlement Website
www.CarterReedSettlement.com
Claims Administrator
Carter-Reed Settlement Administrator
P.O. Box 1984
Faribault, MN 55021-6180
1-800-254-5142
Class Counsel
Jeffrey I. Carton
DENLEA & CARTON LLP
Defense Counsel
Christopher Sullivan
David Parkinson
PRICE PARKINSON & KERR PLLC
UPDATE: Viewers began reporting they were receiving checks from the Relacore class action settlement on July 3, 2015. Congratulations to everyone who submitted valid claims and got PAID!
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
111 thoughts onRelacore False Advertising Class Action Settlement
?! Why is the court allowing the members of the damaged class action to incur more costs. They are making it more difficult and likely that the form will be not returned, by not including a postage paid envelope into which place the form.
I wonder if they are going to compare what we put on the form to the original online claim?
I received the same letter .I’m gonna fill it out and return it. We’ll see if they pay it.
?Monitor.- Why is the court allowing this, since the identical information was provided on-line and certified to? What happens if one does not return the form? Difficult to remember how many were purchased and from what store.Thanks
i got the letter too. are you guys going to fill it out and send it? gosh what a waste of papers. we already filled this out online
I got the same letter. Everyone who file a claim probably got one
Got the same letter, filled it out and dropping it in the mail tomorrow.
Same here, got the letter today. Bought the stuff in about 2007, I believe! Thankfully, I still have an empty bottle. Expiration date is 2009. I assume they are just trying to minimize their outlay.
I got a letter today wanting more information. They wanted to know how many bottles I bought, where at and when. They also wanted a signature. So I am going to say this is a delay tactic and trying to weed out someone who might not use their signature as a scare tactic. Figuring they might eliminate some fraudulent applications.
I got that letter today too. I signed it to the best of my ability and mailed it back today,but your right they probably just want to be sure its a valid claim. I bought so many of these bottles years ago for my wife and I and of course dont have any reciepts but still signed and returned…..No worries just send it back..
SO WHAT HAPPEN IN COURT TODAY?
They met but couldn’t make a decision.