Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
This settlement is closed!
Please see what other class action settlements you might qualify to claim cash from in our Open Settlements directory!
A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit alleging Electrolux manufactured and sold refrigerators that contain a defective ice maker. If you purchased a Crosley, Electrolux or Frigidaire “French Door” refrigerator-freezer unit with a Gen 1 Ice Maker, you may be entitled to payment from the class action settlement.
The ice maker class action lawsuit accused Frigidaire of acting deceptively in designing, manufacturing, selling and servicing “French Door” refrigerators with a certain type of ice maker. The plaintiffs allege that the Electrolux ice maker is defective.
Electrolux denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the ice maker class action lawsuit to avoid the uncertainty, time and expense of further litigation.
Class Members who wish to opt out of the Electrolux ice maker class action settlement must do so no later than Jan. 4, 2016.
UPDATE: The court granted final approval of this settlement on Feb. 10, 2016. Claims are being processed at this time. Keep checking this article for updates.
Who’s Eligible
Class Members of the Electrolux ice maker settlement include: “[A]ll individuals and entities in the United States who are original purchasers of a Gen 1 FDBM.”
A “Gen 1 FDBM” is a refrigerator-freezer unit with dual refrigerator doors and the freezer compartment mounted below the refrigerator compartment that both:
- Was manufactured by or for Electrolux, and
- Contains a Gen 1 Ice Maker.
A “Gen 1 Ice Maker” is an ice maker module that:
- Is mounted in the refrigerator compartment,
- Dispenses ice through the refrigerator door,
- Creates ice cubes by cooling water to below freezing by means of liquid coolant circulating through metal “fingers” inserted vertically into cup-shape molds filled with water, and
- Produces cylindrical ice cubes.
NOTE: If you have received a full refund of the purchase price for a qualifying refrigerator or if you received a free exchange refrigerator without a Gen 1 Ice Maker, you are not a Class Member of this Electrolux ice maker settlement.
Potential Award
$100 or more.
Under the terms of the ice maker class action settlement, Electrolux will pay a $100 cash benefit to each Claim Member who submits a timely and valid Claim Form.
Class Members who submit receipts documenting qualifying past out-of-pocket repair expenses may receive reimbursement for some or all of these expenses.
Additionally, Class Members may receive a non-transferable $100 rebate on the future purchase of qualifying Electrolux or Frigidaire appliances.
Proof of Purchase
Class Members must provide the serial number of the qualifying refrigerator.
NOTE: The Gen 1 FDBMs include some (but not all) refrigerators with model numbers that begin as follows:
Claim Form
Claim Form Deadline
2/3/2016
Case Name
In re: Electrolux Home Products Ice Maker Cases, Case No. 1:12-cv-03341-NLH-AMD, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Final Hearing
2/10/2016
Settlement Website
www.IceMakerSettlement.com
Claims Administrator
Independent Claims Administrator
P.O. Box 2446
Faribault, MN 55021-9140
1-877-315-9961
Class Counsel
NAGEL RICE LLP
POULOS LOPICCOLO PC
Defense Counsel
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
106 thoughts onElectrolux Ice Maker Class Action Settlement
Purchased fridge in 8/20. Bought an extended warranty. Had the icemaker and fill valve replaced. No go. My tech did some research only to find “this” mess. He even returned the $300 we paid him cuz it was under the extended warranty. How’s that for a tech!! This is the first I’m hearing about these issues. I am anticipating a battle based on what I’m reading. I’m thinking legal letter for starters.