Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
This settlement is closed!
Please see what other class action settlements you might qualify to claim cash from in our Open Settlements directory!
A $20 million settlement has been reached to resolve claims that Uber misclassifies their California and Massachusetts drivers as independent contractors.
The settlement will benefit individuals who were Uber drivers in California or Massachusetts between Aug. 16, 2009 and Feb. 28, 2019, and who are not bound by Uber’s arbitration clause.
Drivers may not be bound by the arbitration clause either because they validly opted out of arbitration or because Uber has no record of their acceptance on an arbitration agreement.
Plaintiffs in the Uber class action lawsuits claim that the ride sharing company wrongfully classifies their drivers as independent contractors opposed to employees. By classifying their drivers as independent contractors, Uber allegedly gets out of providing certain benefits.
Labor laws in states such as California provide additional protections for workers that may not apply on the federal level. These laws may require stricter requirements for overtime pay and employee classification.
Uber allegedly failed to reimburse their drivers for vehicle and phone expenses, failed to pass along entire tips, and interfered with the drivers’ relationship with passengers.
These alleged actions prompted two class action lawsuits against the company. Uber attempted to fight the class action lawsuits by claiming that the plaintiffs were bound by arbitration clauses.
Class Members who file a valid claim will be able to recover compensation for the number of miles they spent “On Trip” between Aug. 16, 2009 and Feb. 28, 2019.
To receive payment, Class Members need to file a valid claim by July 18, 2019.
The exact payment amount will depend on the number of valid claims filed and the amount of the settlement fund set aside for attorneys’ fees, administration fees, and other costs.
The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 18, 2019. The final approval hearing is scheduled for July 18, 2019.
Who’s Eligible
Individuals who were Uber drivers in California or Massachusetts between Aug. 16, 2009 and Feb. 28, 2019, and who are not bound by Uber’s arbitration clause (either because you validly opted out of arbitration or because Uber has no record of your acceptance on an arbitration agreement).
Potential Award
Compensation for miles spent “on trip” during the class period (Aug. 16, 2009 to Feb. 28, 2019).
Proof of Purchase
N/A
Claim Form
NOTE: If you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim.
Remember: you are submitting your claim under penalty of perjury. You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim. If you’re unsure if you qualify, please read the FAQ section of the Settlement Administrator’s website to ensure you meet all standards (Top Class Actions is not a Settlement Administrator). If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other open class action settlements you may be eligible for.
Claim Form Deadline
7/18/2019
Case Name
O’Connor, et al. v. Uber Technologies Inc., Case No. 3:13-cv-03826-EMC, and Yucesoy, et al. v. Uber Technologies Inc., et al., Case No. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Final Hearing
7/18/2019
Settlement Website
Claims Administrator
Uber Class Action Settlement
Settlement Administrator
c/o Epiq
P.O. Box 3518
Portland, OR 97208-3518
info@UberLitigation.com
1-855-571-5869
Class Counsel
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Adelaide Pagano
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN PC
Defense Counsel
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Theane Evangelis
Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Joshua S. Lipshutz
Peter C. Squeri
Shailey Jain
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
Read More Lawsuit & Settlement News:
Essentia Water Class Action Says ‘Superior Hydration’ Claims are Deceptive
Essure Device: Construction and Materials Blamed for Complications
Best Buy, Delta Website Chat Services Hit With Data Breach Class Action
Woman Alleges Hernia Mesh Failure Symptoms from Multiple Products
Join a Free California Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
If you were forced to work off the clock or without overtime pay within the past 3 years in California, you have rights – and you don’t have to take on the company alone.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
14 thoughts onCalif., Mass. Uber Driver Misclassification Class Action Settlement
For people who got money thru lawsuit. Are we going to get a 1099.? If not, do we report it when we do taxes.
Any updates on checks?
Got 21.11 today
Anyone get a check yet?
Please add me! I drove on San Diego, Ca from 9/2015 to 1/2016.. retired and now live in Va
Me too I just got the notice
add me
Add me
Please add me
Add me
This is completely going to fail, you have so low of chance to even have judge agree to settlement. The attorneys are so garbage and literally done nothing but write, type on paper, show up to court than talk the garbage that barely was granted after numerous attempts for class approval. Than as I called it attorneys want a quarter of settlement, straight garbage money hungry attorneys that have no actual motivation or heart into this, I am objecting based on attorneys percentage and documentation supporting that there class council had full on knowledge of no arbitration agreement, they obviously filed multiple times to certify and yet how did they not know when they obviously know how to file documents in court, they also are requesting driving courses when thats not applicable for INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS BECAUSE IT IS CONSIDERING EMPLOYEE TRAINING. ALSO TIPS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN CONSIDERING WERE INDEPENDANT CONTRACTORS AND CANNOT ACCEPT DUE TO BEING PAID FOR WORK PERFORMED MAKING TIPS BEING TAKEN FROM UBER NOT ILLEGAL BECAUSE WERE NOT EMPLOYED AND PAID BASED ON WORK PERFORMED, unless rider states that it is for individual who transported them than its uber who can say tip was for platform and uber for whatever reason they want… this whole class action is terrible. Have yet to see evidence strong enough to not be rejected again.
Where the Fuk were these attorneys when I submitted numerous class cases, involving evidence I have built for year now of Uber and multiple accounts of unlawful activity. Also I have proof that they consider us employees actually fact evidence that covers all principles that are required to be considered an employee…I am also going to object to this because of the Class Council is obviously not have actual strong evidence or anything that would stand ground for class action approval from judge. Also they obviously took first offer from uber trying to get minimal amount to secure win. Also I am certain that 25-50 percent is going to be pocketed in attorney fees and share as well to Class council who probably have not been through half the insane amount of emotional stress and severe life threatening experiences uber driving consists of….