Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

BMWOn Friday, March 13, BMW of North America LLC was hit with a class action lawsuit accusing the company of deceiving consumers by marketing vehicles as “TwinPower Turbo” engines when they are allegedly only single-turbocharger engines.

Lead plaintiff, California resident Deepkarn Singh Bedi, alleges that in late 2012 he researched and decided to lease a new BMW 335i. According to the BMW class action lawsuit, the dealership’s advertising as well as information on the internet indicated that the car had “TwinPower Turbo” engines, which the plaintiff thought were the more powerful Twin Turbo engines. Bedi claims he later discovered that BMW uses the term “TwinPower Turbo” for both actual twin turbo engines and single turbo engines interchangeably.

“Twin-turbo engines are objectively superior to single-turbo engines,” the BMW class action lawsuit alleges. “Conventional driving tests can measure this superior performance. For example, twin-turbo engines boast reduced turbo lag, superior throttle response, smoother delivery of power and torque, and greater ease of tuning.”

“Because a twin-turbo engine is significantly better than a single-turbo engine, twin-turbo engines are particularly prestigious and sought after, thereby commanding a price premium relative to non-twin-turbo vehicles,” the BMW class action lawsuit continues. “BMW’s actions demonstrate the importance of twin-turbocharging in establishing brand prestige and performance, so as to command a price premium. Had it been otherwise, BMW would have more routinely employed single-turbo engines in place of the twin turbos.”

According to the class action lawsuit, BMW began using the term “TwinPower Turbo” to market its less powerful models that relied on twin scrolling. “In developing the single-turbo N55 engine to replace the twin-turbo N54, BMW faced a marketing problem stemming from the loss of a turbo, and a deviation from the proud heritage of the N54,” Bedi alleges. “Because the N55 might be perceived as a downgrade from the N54 (going from a twin turbo to a single turbo), BMW described the False Twin N55 engine, and vehicles with the same, as ‘TwinPower Turbo.’ In doing so, BMW relied on the cachet associated with the twin-turbo N54.”

Both the plaintiff and other BMW purchasers believed the term “TwinPower Turbo” meant the vehicles they purchased contained the more powerful twin turbo engine, rather than the single turbo engine, according to the BMW class action lawsuit. The BMW models that contain single turbo engines but are referenced as “TwinPower Turbo” include all N55 and N20 variants manufactured from 2012 until the present.

Bedi claims that BMW’s “TwinPower Turbo” marketing violates state law in California and New Jersey. He accuses BMW of fraud and unjust enrichment. He is seeking an injunction against BMW as well as damages for himself and a nationwide Class of consumers.

Bedi is represented by Natalie Finkelman Bennett, James C. Shah, and Nathan C. Zipperian of Shepard Finkelman Miller & Shah LLP.

The BMW “TwinPower Turbo” Class Action Lawsuit is Bedi v. BMW of North America LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-01898, in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

UPDATE: The BMW TwinPower Turbo class action lawsuit was dismissed on May 31, 2017.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


3 thoughts onBMW ‘TwinPower Turbo’ Deceptive, Class Action Lawsuit Says

  1. Sharon Roman says:

    BMW 2009 535 xi owner. Out of all of the times taking the car for service for various reasons, I decided to look for information regarding my latest issue. Twin Turbo. I was told my rear turbo was bad and it is recommended to do both.

    I had the car serviced in October, they told me the oil smell was due to the spring from oil cap missing. They said whoever did the oil change did not put the spring back. This supposedly caused the engine oil to push up and come out the silver lines in front of black cap. They look like bolts. (2). Before that I took the car for an oil burning smell was told something else. Not to mention that the transfer case and differential broke in March of 2016. The extended warranty I purchased denied to pay because the car did not have the 17 that supposedly came with the car, but when I bought the car it had 18 inch staggered wheels and I did not have a problem for the almost a year regarding the transfer case and differential. I even had pictures of when the car was sitting in the lot for sale. That job was quoted at over $6000.

    I take excellent care of my car. I take it to be service for any little thing.

    A month later I noticed the same oil smell. The second time, I was on the road most of the day and when I exited the highway I got an engine warning to please shut off the engine immediately. Oil was low. I had someone bring me 2 quarts of oil and car read full. I looked on top of the engine and noticed oil 0n one of the silver looking bolts where the rubber meets the metal. I took it back to BMW and I was told it was the rear turbo that was bad. Before that visit I took it to BMW due to the oil smell but was told it was something else. They want $6,900. However I sill owe approximately $7,500 to the bank.

    I read in a few posts that the twin turbo issue was extended to 10 years or 120,000 miles. my car was first purchase in May 2009. Therefore I am assuming I am out of time. However, I was never notified of a recall. My vin number apparently does not come up with any recalls, even though most of the issues other 2009 BMW owners have experienced. My car does not have 120,000 miles yet.

    Also I took the car to BMW for vanos solenoids. And another time in October again because the car over heated suddenly. It was the fan. Just recently I learned that some of the 2009 BMW 535 had a recall but I never received anything. I questioned the dealer but he said he had nothing on file. Further reading I found out that the company I believed called Vanos was doing the recalls. Just in October 2019 I spent about $3,000 in repairs. That now I believe could have been covered.

    Overall on different issues I think I have spent over $13,000 in repairs since I purchased the car in May 2015.

  2. Dr. Solomon says:

    Bases of dismissal?

  3. Top Class Actions says:

    UPDATE: The BMW TwinPower Turbo class action lawsuit was dismissed on May 31, 2017.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.