Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
This settlement is closed!
Please see what other class action settlements you might qualify to claim cash from in our Open Settlements directory!
CVS agreed to pay over $745,000 as part of a class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims it failed to adjust rates of pay for sick pay when California workers received additional forms of compensation during their pay period.
The settlement benefits individuals who worked as a non-exempt employee at a CVS store in California between Sept. 17, 2019, and July 24, 2022, and who received sick pay and additional compensation in the same pay period but did not have their regular rate of pay adjusted for sick pay.
The wage-an-hour class action lawsuit claims CVS violated California law by failing to account for additional forms of compensation when calculating sick pay rates of pay during certain pay periods. As a result, some California employees allegedly received less in sick pay than they were owed.
CVS is a national pharmacy with locations around the country, including many in California.
CVS hasn’t admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to a $745,687.50 settlement to resolve the sick pay class action lawsuit.
Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive a cash payment based on the number of eligible pay periods they worked during the pay period.Â
Class members received a notice indicating the number of pay periods allocated to them by the settlement administrator and an estimated payment amount. Some class members can receive an additional payment from the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) portion of the settlement.
The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 17, 2023.
The final approval hearing for the CVS settlement is scheduled for Oct. 5, 2023.
No claim form is required to benefit from the settlement, but class members can dispute the number of pay periods listed in their notice by contacting the settlement administrator with evidence by July 17, 2023.
Who’s Eligible
Individuals who worked as a non-exempt employee at a CVS store in California between Sept. 17, 2019, and July 24, 2022, who received sick pay and additional compensation in the same pay period but did not have their regular rate of pay adjusted for sick pay
Potential Award
Varies
Proof of Purchase
Documentation of eligible pay periods, if disputing the number allocated
Claim Form Deadline
07/17/2023
Case Name
Marden v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., et al., Case No. S-CV-0045902, in the California Superior Court for Placer County
Final Hearing
10/05/2023
Settlement Website
Claims Administrator
Marden v CVS
c/o Atticus Administration
PO Box 64053
Saint Paul, MN 55164
888-210-0855
Class Counsel
Michael D SingerÂ
Jeff Geraci
COHELAN KHOURY & SINGERÂ
Emil Davtyan
DAVTYAN LAW FIRM INC
Defense Counsel
Jennifer B Zargarof
Sonia A Vucetic
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- Beth Israel 401(k) $2.9M class action settlement
- Forest River Manufacturing overtime rate miscalculation $395K class action settlement
- Bobak Sausage Co. employee BIPA $238K class action settlement
- Rover independent contractor misclassification $18M class action settlement
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
One thought on CVS California sick pay $745K class action settlement
I would like to file a class action law suit against HUD.gov/ US Department of Housing for massive Discrimination against those persons who have housing with them and pay monthly rents. Federal and State Cost of living benefits are designed to help Americans offset high living costs. My HUD housing monthly rent is a percentage of my annual income. When I receive a social security cost of living increase, HUD housing also increases my monthly rent at the same amount, thus, I Never benefit from any State or Federal Cost of living benefit. Other Americans who do not reside in HUD housing DO benefit. I feel this is unfair and would like to sue HUD housing to stop this economic discrimination policy. Can you please connect me with a law firm? Thank you.