Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Plaintiff Barack O. has filed a lawsuit against Specialized Loan Servicing (SLS), claiming that the company regularly violates the Texas financial code by charging illegal processing fees to borrowers who pay their monthly mortgage payments over the phone.
SLS Allegedly Charges Illegal Mortgage Payment Fees
According to Barack, he purchased a home and secured a mortgage in September 2001. At some point after this, SLS acquired servicing rights to his loan, and he began making mortgage payments to the company over the phone. Barack claims he was charged $7.50 for making a mortgage payment to SLS over the phone on October 17, 2019. He claims that this fee was excessive, and is illegal under Texas financial codes.
Specialized Loan Servicing services mortgages across the United States. Although loan servicing companies are allowed to pass on charges from third-parties to consumers when these third-parties provide services to borrowers, they are prohibited from inflating these costs in order to pocket a profit. However, according to Barack and other consumers, this may be exactly what Specialized Loan Servicing is doing.
According to Barack’s lawsuit, by industry standards it costs SLS approximately $0.50 to process a mortgage payment made over the phone. However, the company is allegedly charging between $7.50 and $12.50 to consumers for these payments. These fees are often referred to as pay-to-pay fees, and are not allowed under many financial laws. Additionally, these mortgage payment fees are not disclosed or included in Barack’s mortgage agreement.
Barack’s lawsuit seeks to recover damages on his own behalf, as well as on the behalf of other consumers who have also been charged illegal pay-to-pay fees by SLS.
About Pay-to-Pay Fees
SLS is not the only mortgage servicer to be accused of charging illegal mortgage payment fees when consumers make mortgage payments online or over the phone. Citibank and its store card unit have also been accused of charging pay-to-pay fees for consumers who made phone payments.
According to Citibank customers, the bank may be calling these charges “processing charges”, and assessing them for payments that are posted the same day. However, some consumers have claimed that they did not need their payments to be posted the same day, and free phone payments that would have posted later may have been available.
Consumers have accused Green Tree Servicing of similar incidents of pressure. While other forms of payment may have been free, customers of Green Tree claim that the company falsely represented a service with a $12 processing fee as the only way to make mortgage payments. Wells Fargo and HSBC Banks were also accused of charging excessive fees.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, some companies may be misleading consumers about pay-to-pay fees, either by misrepresenting the purpose of the fee, or by pressuring consumers to pay additional fees to post their payments the same day, even when that is not necessary. Other companies may be representing paid options for making mortgage payments as the only options available to consumers, even when there are free options.
Consumers who have been pressured or misled into making mortgage payments with pay-to-pay fees may be eligible to hire an attorney to review their case and determine whether they qualify to file a lawsuit. Additionally, consumers who have been charged excessive pay-to-pay fees for paying their mortgage over the phone or online may be eligible to hire an attorney if these fees were hidden fees and not disclosed in their mortgage agreement. Victims who pursue litigation may be able to recover reimbursement for these fees, as well as additional compensation.
Barack’s SLS Pay-to-Pay Mortgage Lawsuit is Case No: 1:20-cv-00701, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.
This article is not legal advice. It is presented
for informational purposes only.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
18 thoughts onSpecialized Loan Servicing Accused of Charging Mortgage Payment Fees
SLS hasnt paid my property taxes for the first half of 2024 ,I have an escrow account that
covers the taxes, SLS tax department told me it shows my loan not an active loan,no one can answer why
they havent paid my property taxes.
I have over 5 years of proof of what this disreputable company has done to us. Late fee charges that were wrong, never have been late on payments ever. making us file chapter 13 because they said they were forclosing on our home of 32 plus years do to non payment…even though we have proof of every payment from our bank. We had to hire an Attorney to the tune of $1500 to save our home, he screwed up the chapter 13 and we had no recourse but to get a early reverse mortgage on the home. I detest SLS.
They returned our payments for several months saying we had insufficient funds. Which is ridiculous because we paid by our banks to send out the payments. Some of our payments were returned it yet they said we were late. I made a phone payment and three weeks later that was returned because I didn’t make it the proper way. Now they are threatening our balloon payment even though our credit report shows that we are completely up-to-date and have been.
We were on a Covid Forbearance. I made 2 payments during forbearance that were returned. I live in NY and asked forbearance amount to be Deferred to the end of the loan.
In June I called made payment in July called made payment and at that time they stated the full forbearance is due. I stayed it this is the first time I am hearing this. NY law allows this now they wouldn’t take Aug payment. Literally make things up. Received nothing from them.