Anne Bucher  |  August 25, 2016

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Target aloe class action lawsuitTarget has been hit with a class action lawsuit alleging its Up & Up Aloe Vera Gel product contains no actual aloe.

Plaintiff Susan Nazari of Sacramento, Calif., claims she relied on the Up & Up Aloe Vera Gel product labeling when she made the decision to purchase the product.

According to the aloe vera class action lawsuit, she would not have purchased the product if she had known it did not actually contain aloe.

Aloe vera gel comes from the aloe plant and is used to moisturize and soothe skin.

Nazari says she relied on the label, which prominently states “Aloe Vera Gel” and “pure aloe vera.” Further, the back label lists “Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice” as the second ingredient, according to the aloe vera class action lawsuit.

“After the consumer watchdog group ConsumerLab.com reported that several commercially available aloe products contain no aloe vera, Plaintiff’s counsel tested the Product and found it contained no aloe vera,” the Target class action lawsuit states.

According to the Target aloe class action lawsuit, laboratory testing revealed that the Up & Up Aloe Vera Gel contained no Acemannan, the key compound in aloe vera. Therefore, it cannot be considered true aloe vera, Nazari claims.

The Target class action lawsuit points to guidance from the International Aloe Science Council, which is an international non-profit organization that was formed in the 1980s to protect consumers from products falsely labeled as aloe.

The IASC reportedly asserts that products that don’t contain Acemannan, the active ingredient in aloe vera’s inner leaf gel, aren’t considered true aloe vera products.

“The lack of aloe vera and Acemannan in the Product reduces the value of the Product to nil,” the Target aloe class action lawsuit alleges. “No consumer would have purchased the Product had they known it contained no aloe vera.”

Nazari alleges that Target knowingly developed and employed a marketing strategy that was designed to deceive consumers and convince them to purchase the mislabeled aloe vera product.

The class action lawsuit claims that Up & Up Aloe Vera Gel is misbranded according to the federal Food Drug & Cosmetic Act.

Nazari filed the Target class action lawsuit on behalf of herself and a Class of consumers who purchased the allegedly misbranded Up & Up Aloe Vera Gel product in the last four years. She also seeks to certify a subclass of California residents who purchased the product.

The aloe vera class action lawsuit asserts claims for violations of California’s False Advertising Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law, Unfair Business Acts and Practices, Fraudulent Business Acts and Practices, breach of express warranty, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.

Nazari is represented by Michael F. Ram and Susan S. Brown of Ram Olson Cereghino & Kopczynski LLP.

The Target Up & Up Aloe Gel Class Action Lawsuit is Susan Nazari v. Target Corporation d/b/a Target, Case No. 2:16-cv-02015, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


 

31 thoughts onTarget Class Action Alleges Up & Up Aloe Gel Contains No Aloe

  1. Barbara Riggle says:

    Now I know why it didn’t work on several occasions on burns scrapes etc on my grandkids bought several fory house and the kids to keep for them

  2. jackie hanna says:

    I bought it before I left for the Dominican Republic. Did not work

  3. Edie D Snider says:

    Yes I also purchased this product as it said it was Aloe Vera I must start reading the ingredient list before making purchases this was very misleading and a waste of money

  4. Chriss Hay says:

    Yeap. Another product rip off. More cr*p in a bottle we paid for.

  5. Judy Reynolds says:

    I bought twice, it seemed a good deal. I’m in

  6. P. Dean says:

    I have purchased this for sunburns count me in!

  7. Becky morris says:

    I’m in too .. i though it was going to be just as good as the name brand it was on sale so I got 2 bottles that’s what I get for tring to save a dollar got to the beach and had to buy more. Cause it wasn’t helping.

  8. jean brown says:

    This product has been purchased by me many times for sunburn on myself, grand children and great grandchildren. What a disappointment to find out I was not helping their sun burns. As I live in Florida I used it a lot.

  9. Kelly Bowman says:

    I have purchased this product also, I’m in Michigan we should be able to be in on the claim too. Why people think they can get away with things like this is so outrageous.

  10. Trish says:

    That’s just sad, what liars

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.