Emily Sortor  |  March 23, 2018

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

subaru-imprezaSubaru has been hit with a class action lawsuit claiming that Impreza WRX and WRX STi engines are defective and pose a danger to consumers.

Plaintiff Christopher Thompson alleges that his Subaru Impreza vehicle, along with those of thousands of other customers, has a defective engine, and that the defect causes the engines to fail well before the expected capacity of the engine’s life, and in so doing, puts the driver and others in danger.

The Impreza WRX engine failure class action lawsuit comes on the heels of another class action lawsuit over the same engine defect, filed in December 2017, that claimed the defect should be covered under Subaru’s warranty.

In contrast, Thompson’s claim is broader, seeking damages for himself and other consumers for breach of warranty, breach of express warranty, misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, financial injury, and other accusations.

Thompson claims that the engine defect affects Subaru Impreza WRX and WRX STi vehicles made between 2009 and 2014, containing engines with codes EJ255 and EJ257. The Subaru engine failure class action lawsuit claims that the engine models contain defective pistons, engine management systems, and positive crankcase ventilation systems.

According to Thompson, the engines for the Impreza vehicles were based on the design for a less powerful engine. Though the WRX engines were designed to be “high-performance,” with double the horsepower of their predecessor.

The Subaru WRX engine failure class action lawsuit claims that in adapting the earlier design to work in a new engine with higher horsepower, the company did not modify component parts so they could withstand the wear and tear that comes with running the engine at higher speeds and with more force. As a result, the connecting rod bearings and main crankshaft bearings allegedly failed in the WRX vehicles, unable to withstand the WRX’s increased power output.

The Impreza engine defect class action lawsuit states that engines in passenger motor vehicles should last for at least 120,000 miles, but claims that the Impreza WRX and WRX STi vehicles’ engines fail prematurely at low mileages. Allegedly, such engine failure can cause an engine to stall or stop running while a vehicle is being driven, putting drivers, passengers, and others around the vehicle at risk of serious injury or death as a result of a collision.

Thompson argues that Subaru knew that the Impreza engines were defective, but nonetheless released the vehicles to the automobile market, knowingly endangering consumers and others. Thompson claims that the engines in question were first released into the market in 2008, and Subaru received consumer complaints about the defective engines. Thompson includes numerous examples of these consumer complaints to support his claim.

The Subaru owner is represented by Gary S. Graifman of Kantrowitz Goldhamer & Graifman PC, and Thomas P. Sobran of Thomas P. Sobran PC.

The Subaru Impreza Engine Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Christopher Thompson v. Subaru of America Inc., et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-03736, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


26 thoughts onSubaru Impreza Class Action Lawsuit Claims Engines are Defective

  1. Jason Kussman says:

    I was just notified that my daughter’s engine has failed. This is very frustrating seeing that subaru new about this problem. And did nothing to get these vehicles off the road. Excessive oil consumption since we bought the car.

  2. Cyndi says:

    Pls. Add me

  3. Kyle Hughes says:

    My 2013 wrx spun a rod bearing at 82,000 miles with all service done on time by my local Subaru Dealership. I’m out $6,600 on a new motor. I would like to be a part of this suit.

  4. Andrew says:

    My 06 wrx with a blown motor was the first model to have the ej255 as far as I know but why isn’t it included?

  5. Buddy Thorn says:

    2013 sti blew up at 47000 mile then again at 67000 now they are denying my claim

  6. Moses says:

    My 09 subaru wrx 1st motor with a rod nock at 86k not so good

  7. Moses says:

    09 subaru wrx first engine gave out 79k

  8. Brad says:

    A bit of advice, I realize that class action lawsuits solely serve the purpose of making the attorney representing a lot of money. However if you are basing your case on what you have written here as far as the question of Engineering in the Subaru engine then you have literally no case. You don’t even mention all of the models in which the EJ255 is available, plus you obviously have no experience in the engineering field or a manufacturing environment. Under normal circumstances for someone who is actually seeking knowledge I would be more than happy to go step-by-step through all of the engineering for you so that you would actually be able to understand the differences amongst the several different iterations of Subaru engines. Unfortunately since all you’re looking to do is make a quick buck I will just let you fall on your face with your complete and utter lack of technical knowledge.

  9. Daniel Hernandez says:

    My engine blew with 30k miles. My insurance only paid for half of the cost. I was taken for over 4K. I want to be a part of this class action law suit.

    1. Brad says:

      At 30,000 miles your engine would have still been under full Factory powertrain warranty and insurance would have had nothing to do with it. So apparently either you are lying, or you modified & abused your engine to the point that you destroyed it.

  10. Tyler says:

    What about the 2008 sti’s? It still has the EJ257 and same everything as the 2009 and 2010 sti?? Why is this not on the list..

1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.