Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Roundup Weed and Grass Killer attacks beneficial bacteria in a way that runs contrary to its labeling, according to a New York class action plaintiff.
Plaintiff Mario Washington has filed a false advertising lawsuit challenging the labeling on defendant Monsanto’s Roundup Weed and Grass Killer. According to Washington, the promotional materials for Roundup say that it targets an enzyme “found in plants but not in people or pets.”
Washington says that representation is false. He claims the active ingredient in Roundup targets a beneficial bacterial enzyme found in both humans and pets. As a result of that alleged misrepresentation, consumers are being deceived into purchasing a dangerous product that does exactly what they expect it not to do, he says.
Roundup uses a chemical called glyphosate, invented and marketed by Monsanto after DDT was banned. Washington says Monsanto has been marketing glyphosate under the brand name Roundup since 1974. In the late 1990s, the company boosted Roundup sales by introducing a line of genetically engineered crops designed to resist the effects of glyphosate, he says.
Glyphosate works by inhibiting the enzyme EPSP synthase, an enzyme used by certain organisms but not by others. Weeds depend on EPSP synthase to process aromatic amino acids, Washington says. But so do certain beneficial bacteria that live in the gut of mammals, including humans and pets.
According to Washington, glyphosate can enter the human body through the ingestion of residual weed killer on foods. Pets may also ingest it by eating plants that have been treated with Roundup. Humans who handle Roundup may also be exposed to glyphosate through inhalation or dermal absorption.
Monsanto supposedly knows the representations on the labeling for Roundup are contrary to the truth of how glyphosate works, Washington claims. As the inventor of glyphosate, Monsanto allegedly knows the bacterial enzyme it targets is present in both humans and animals, not just weeds.
Yet despite that knowledge, he says, the company continues to represent that Roundup targets only plants.
By using these alleged misstatements, Washington says, Monsanto is exploiting consumer’s interest in weed killers that target weeds without targeting people or animals. Consumers are willing to pay more for such a product, he says.
Were it not for the allegedly false labeling on Roundup, the same consumers would not pay as much for the product, or they would not purchase it at all, Washington claims.
Washington proposes to represent a statewide plaintiff Class consisting of all persons in New York who purchased Roundup weed and grass killer during the applicable statutory limitations period.
He seeks a court injunction barring Monsanto from continuing the allegedly deceptive advertising complained of here. He is also asking for an award of actual, statutory and punitive damages as may be available, restitution and disgorgement of related revenues, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and court costs.
Washington is represented by attorney Michael J. Gabrielli of Gabrielli Levitt LLP.
The Roundup False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit is Mario Washington v. Monsanto Co., Case No. 2:17-cv-02216, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
220 thoughts onRoundup Class Action Says Weed Killer Falsely Labeled to Deceive Consumers
ditto, it fail, got a container saturday and is slow to do anything yet i keep trying
This class action is not about Roundup not working to kill weeds. It’s about the labeling that potentially deceives customers about it’s safety for humans and pets. It’s about the use of the chemical that Monsanto developed, glyphosate. The company claims only targets the enzyme in plants, not humans or pets. The potential that the chemical glyphosate harms humans and pets beneficial gut bacteria. Please read the suit information before asking to be included.
I buy at least 2 bottles per year, in hopes that it will work better, and it NEVER does. I’m in.
I buy round up at least twice per year in hopes that it will work better than the last year. It always fails..I’m in.
Yeah, Ashley – you also tried getting in the Trojan Condom class action. And others. You should be in jail for fraud. I hope it happens. You’re freeloading scum and are exactly what’s wrong with society today. Go play in traffic. Class actions are for ACTUAL CUSTOMERS and people who suffered ill-effects with a product. Not for lazy bums like you to sit back and get free money.
I also bought countless bottles from home depot and had weeds
Countless large bottles with applicator brought. Home owner. I’m in!
I purchased a large bottle of this and it doesn’t wrk
I want in please.
Put me on it.
wow I have bought many of these and ill tell you the weeds grew faster then the grass that it did kill