Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
The makers of Pirate’s Booty are facing a lawsuit alleging the products are deceptively packaged and include more than 44.44 percent empty space.
Plaintiff David Greenstein is accusing B&G Food Inc. and Pirate Brands LLC of manufacturing and marketing its Pirate’s Booty products with excessive slack-fill that serves no function.
According to the Pirate’s Booty lawsuit, Greenstein paid $2 for a package of Aged White Cheddar Pirate’s Booty on April 3. The opaque packaging allegedly made it impossible for Greenstein to view the content contained within so that he was unaware of the slack-fill issue until he opened the package.
When he opened the package, Greenstein observed that there was a great deal of empty space. He says that the available space for the Pirate’s Booty product if the package were 100 percent full would be 5 3/8 inches. However, the Pirate’s Booty lawsuit says that the actual product takes up about 2 3/8 inches.
Greenstein estimates that this unutilized space amounts to 44.44 percent of slack-fill, an amount that is allegedly excessive and violates California’s consumer protection laws. He says he would not have paid as much for the Pirate’s Booty product if he had known it contained an excessive amount of slack-fill.
“Plaintiff did not expect the packages to be crammed full of product, or filled to the full available space; plaintiff understands and acknowledges that there are legitimate reasons for a certain amount of slack fill,” Greenstein says in the Pirate’s Booty lawsuit. For example, a certain amount of slack-fill may be necessary to accommodate machines used in packaging the product or to protect the product from becoming damaged.
However, he “contends that a large percentage of the slack fill in the package serves no benefit to the product or the consumer, and thus is non-functional in violation of California laws.”
According to the Pirate’s Booty lawsuit, the defendants manufactured, marketed and sold the Pirate Booty’s product knowing that it contained excessive slack-fill, which Greenstein says is “part of a systematic practice to deceive consumers.” He claims the defendants have been unjustly enriched as a result of this practice.
Greenstein says his primary purpose for filing the Pirate’s Booty lawsuit is to stop the defendants from continuing to engage in this deceptive practice.
He is seeking general damages, attorneys’ fees, injunctive relief, punitive and/or exemplary damages, costs of suit and other relief deemed appropriate by the court.
Greenstein filed the Pirate Booty lawsuit against B&G Food Inc. and Pirate Brands LLC on June 5 in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. It was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on June 30.
The defendants deny the allegations set forth in Greenstein’s Pirate Booty lawsuit, and assert that Greenstein lacks standing to bring the lawsuit, that he failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, plus other defenses to the litigation.
Greenstein is representing himself.
The Pirate’s Booty Slack-Fill Lawsuit is David Greenstein v. B&G Foods Inc. and Pirate Brands LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-04839, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
213 thoughts onPirate’s Booty Lawsuit Says Snack Product is 44% Empty Space
I’ve bought pirates booty in large quantities from a wholesale warehouse for my grandsons. No wonder they asked for a second bag!!
I have been eat and purchaing these since.they first came out. Was eating.them by the bags. Would hunt down different stores just to find them. Cant even imagine how many bags I have eaten. How can I file a claim. Please add my name to the list.
THIS IS WRONG AND THE LAWSUIT NEEDS TO BECOME OFFICIAL. I HAVE PURCHASED NUMEROUS BAGS FROM TARGET, ETC. PLEASE ADD ME TO THE CLASS ACTION SUIT! THANK YOU.
Yes this is something my family and I have been talking about. It was really noticeable the last time I purchased the multiple bag pack from Costco.
They’re all doing this, especially the famous Frito/Lays. It’s time to go back to clear cellophane packaging.
I agree that this is deceiving! You would think that you would get at least 75% of the size of the bag and the rest being the air fill (packaging and shipping space). But this is getting crazy with how companies can get away with this. Happy that someone was able to do something about it. Please add me as well. Thank you!
this is some thing i have to keep my eyes out for
i am surprised that empty space is costing more and more these days. i have noticed in a couple of pirate booty items that not only is the cost of space on the uptick but so is the cost of the space depending upon how big the bag actually is. it almost seems like yore paying more for space than you are for the physical item.
My children love them, but it’s a shame that they are getting emptier and emptier every single time I buy them for my children. And it really makes my daughter very upset and when mommy see her children upset mommy is upset too.
I buy them from BJs