Ashley Milano  |  October 12, 2016

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Logo NissanNissan North America Inc. has reached a settlement with a group of consumers accusing the company of producing vehicles with defective transmissions and concealing the information from drivers.

Under the terms of the settlement, Nissan agreed to pay for repair costs for potentially tens of thousands of vehicles.

Specifically, the settlement resolves three putative class action lawsuits alleging that certain Nissan Pathfinder and Infiniti vehicles contain a defect in the continuously variable transmission (CVT) which can lead to transmission judder.

Under the settlement, for which the plaintiffs are seeking approval from a Florida federal court, all current or former owners or lessees of 2013-2014 model year Nissan Pathfinder and and Infiniti JX35/QX60 vehicles equipped with the FK0*k2 CVT will benefit from time and mileage durational limits for powertrain coverage under the applicable New Vehicle Limited Warranty to the extent it applies to the transmission assembly by 24 months or 24,000 miles, whichever occurs first.

It is important to note that this warranty extension does not apply to the Automatic Transmission Control Unit (ATCU) and related software, nor does it apply to any other powertrain components.

Nissan has also agreed to notify current owners and lessees of the Class vehicles of an ATCU software update that can set diagnostic trouble codes for detection of transmission judder.

Additionally, the Nissan settlement provides former owners of 2013-2014 model year Nissan Pathfinder and Infiniti JX35/QX60 vehicles VPP pricing for either a purchase or lease of a single eligible Nissan or Infiniti vehicle as long as the authorized VPP participant makes the purchase or lease before Mar. 15, 2018.

In order to qualify for VPP pricing, a settlement Class Member must have warranty records that reflect they owned a 2013-2014 model year Nissan Pathfinder or Infiniti JX35/QX60 vehicles equipped with the FK0*k2 CVT and had two or more CVT replacements or repairs to the transmission assembly, torque converter and/or valve body.

The settlement also stipulates that Nissan will cover plaintiffs’ counsel fees and expenses up to $3.75 million and incentive awards of $5,000 to each of the five Class representatives.

Pathfinder and Infiniti owners Kenai Batista, Andy Chance, Gerardo Torres, Angela Matlin, Boyong Park and Tung Nguyen filed the three putative class action lawsuits against Nissan, alleging that their vehicles were equipped with defective transmissions, causing sudden, unexpected shaking and violent jerking, commonly referred to as “juddering” or “shuddering” when a driver attempts to accelerate the vehicle.

“This transmission defect creates an unreasonably dangerous situation and increases the risk of crash; it is inevitable that an individual will be injured or killed due to a collision caused by this safety defect,” Batista’s lawsuit stated.

According to the plaintiffs, Nissan was at fault for not recalling the affected Pathfinder and Infiniti models, offering to repair the alleged transmission defect free of charge or offering to reimburse Nissan owners, despite the company’s knowledge of the problem.

The complaint also claimed that Nissan chose financial gain over the safety of their consumers by concealing knowledge of the alleged transmission defect and continuing to market the Pathfinder and Infiniti vehicles to customers.

The class action sought more than $5 million in damages, injunctive and declaratory relief, and punitive damages for its alleged deceptive and unfair trade practices, as well as alleged breach of express and implied warranties, violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and Florida common law.

Nissan strongly denied and continues to deny all of the plaintiffs claims related to the alleged transmission defect in 2013-2014 model year Nissan Pathfinder and Infiniti JX35/QX60 vehicles, denies all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damage of any kind to the settlement Class.

However, the automaker has concluded that the settlement is desirable to end further litigation.

The Class is represented by Cory Watson PC, Berger & Montague PC, Newsome Melton LLP, Weil Quaranta PA, and Capstone Law APC.

The Nissan Transmission Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Batista, et al. v. Nissan North America Inc., Case No. 1:14-cv-24728-CIV-SCOLA/OTAZO-REYEZ, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division.

UPDATE: The Nissan transmission defect class action settlement is now open! Click here to see if you qualify.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

58 thoughts onNissan Agrees to Settle Pathfinder Transmission Defect Class Action

  1. Jorge Morales says:

    I have a 2015 Nissan Pathfinder and my transmission went out on the freeway driving my car only has about 122k miles smh I email North America Nissan waiting on a response.

  2. Antonio says:

    My transmission failed at 130k. I was on the freeway with my wife and kids.

    1. Jorge Morales says:

      Is Nissan gonna fixed

      1. DARYL Mccall says:

        My 2014 nissan pathfinder 60020 miles transmission went no problem before that

  3. lisa kay says:

    I have a 2014 Nissan Pathfinder and My transmission went out on it with My 3 Grand children in it! Very scary! My mileage was almost to 60,000 and the end of my warranty.They were very nice and it got fixed . It has been a year and a half and it feels like it is doing the same thing again and i have no warranty.I have 71,000 miles on it now and still making payments on my car.

    1. D Catrett says:

      Since you had the transmission work done, Nissan has to extend the warranty to 84 months or 84,000 miles.

  4. Jason Hawkins says:

    This says Nissan was to notify consumers. I was notified that my warranty was extended not that it was being done for a shudder on acceleration. My car has done this since 40K miles. Had they been forthcoming I would have connected the dots and taken it in. Though I am sure their lack of explanation was so that hopefully not many people would. I do not think Nissan has delivered under the terms of the settlement. I now have a car with 100k miles and progressive damage to the rest of the transmission. It is going to cost me $4,000 I think there should be a second class action for not abiding by the terms of the first.

    1. Denise Walker says:

      I agree!

  5. Randy bell says:

    I have a 2015 with this trans problem they fixed but it came back we bought brand new not sure what to do now

  6. Danny N Ngo says:

    I got Nissan Pathfinder 2014 my transmission some time shaking a lot .it something wrong with my transmission

  7. Kristian Kelly says:

    I had to replace my transmission in my 2013 Pathfinder last year.

  8. Bevon Smith says:

    I purchased a 2014 new Pathfinder from dealer in Hattiesburg, MS. Transmission shakes violently and makes loud noise, I took it to repair shop who diagnosed the transmission CVT or something. Dealer said there was no recall or assistance offered.

  9. Anthony a Holmes says:

    My Nissan pathfinder has transmission problems, and at 66,000 miles I when’d to Nissan, and they told me after test driving my car, that normal and that I needed to change my transmission fluid. Also my brakes are acting up. They kept telling me it nothing wrong even though I know it was. Nissan waited for my pathfinder to reach 82 thousand miles, and called me in for the recall, and update my car, they said. When I ack them what they are doing to my truck, two different people said told me something different.

  10. Kristie says:

    I have a 2014 pathfinder with 100k miles, transmission went out and Nissan dealer in Southaven MS offered no support!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.