Courtney Jorstad  |  April 10, 2015

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Mercedes c;ass action lawsuitA California federal judge has granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement to resolve defective engine allegations against Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., LLC.

U.S. District Judge Thelton E. Henderson said in his Wednesday ruling that “the terms of the settlement agreement are sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate to allow dissemination of the notice.”

The Mercedes class action settlement is for “all current and former owners and lesses of Mercedes-Benz branded automobiles equipped with M272 or M273 engines bearing serial numbers up to 2729..30 468993 or 2739 ..30088611, found in the Subject 2005 – 2007 Model Year Vehicles respectively (the ‘Subject Vehicles’), who purchased or leased their Subject Vehicles within the United States.”

The class representatives are plaintiffs Majeed Seifi, Tracey Deakin and Ronald Reyner, Judge Henderson said.

However, he said that the class action settlement agreement is not an admission of fault by Mercedes that and of the allegations are true and valid and ought “not be offered or be admissible in evidence by or against [Mercedes].”

Class Members will be notified of the class action settlement agreement through relevant vehicle registration information, which the federal judge gives the parties permission to obtain “for the purpose of disseminating notice of the proposed settlement.”

If someone wants to be excluded from this Mercedes class action settlement, they will need to “submit a written request for exclusion.”

“Anyone who falls within the Settlement Class definition and does not submit a Request for Exclusion in complete accordance with the deadlines and other specifications set forth in this Order and the Settlement Agreement shall remain a Settlement Class Member and shall be bound by all proceedings, orders, and judgments of this Court pertaining to the Settlement Class,” Judge Henderson explains.

Mercedes agreed to the defective engine class action settlement on March 23.

The first defective engine class action lawsuit filed against the German automaker was in 2010 in a New Jersey federal court over the allegedly defective M272 or M273 engines, in which it was alleged that “the engines are equipped with defective gears in their balance shafts (in the event of the M272 engines) or with defective idle gears (in the case of the M273 engines).

“These defective gears wear out prematurely, excessively, and without warning, causing the vehicle to malfunction, the ‘check engine light’ to remain illuminated, and the vehicle to misfire and/or stop driving,” the Mercedes class action lawsuit alleged.

This current Mercedes class action lawsuit brought by Seifi and Deakin in October 2012 making similar allegations about the M272 and M273 engines.

According to the class action settlement agreement, Class Members will be reimbursed for repairs they had to fund to the tune of thousands of dollars due to the alleged engine defect as well as “future repairs for the allegedly defective parts at issue for the lesser of 10 years or 125,000 miles, subject to certain conditions and limitations.

“This extended coverage more than doubles the durational limit of MBUSA’s New Vehicle Warranty’s term of the lesser 4 years of 50,000 miles,” the class action settlement agreement explained.

The amount Class Members will receive will vary. Repairs not done at an authorized Mercedes dealer will result in a reimbursement up to $4,000. Mercedes will also cover the cost to repair future engine problems, which will also vary depending on the age of the car when the problems come to fruition. The reimbursement will be 100 percent, 70 percent or 37.5 percent of the cost of the repair.

The plaintiffs are represented by Roy A. Katriel of the Katriel Law Firm and Gary S. Graifman of Kantrowitz Goldhamer & Graifman PC.

The Mercedes-Benz Engine Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Majeed Seifi, et al. v. Mercedes Benz USA LLC, Case No. 3:12-cv-05493, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

70 thoughts onMercedes Defective Engine Class Action Settlement Gets Preliminary Approval

  1. James says:

    Mercedes-The Best of Nothing. REALLY! These cars have had problems for years and Mercedes told the public nothing. No recall-No nothing. Now they want to settle the lawsuit for almost nothing. I understand the attorneys are getting around $2.5 million for selling the claimants down the river. A first year law student could strike a better settlement than this. And what about the firm that supplied the defective shafts to Mercedes. Why are they not being sued. The winners (Mercedes and the Attorneys). The losers (the class action claimants). MERCEDES KEEPS THEIR MONEY, THEIR LOYAL CUSTOMERS GET THE SHAFT.

  2. Man says:

    I sold mine just 2 months ago due to this issue and took a major loss far as what the dealership offered me vs the balance I owed on the car…I wonder if I still qualify

  3. Rommel says:

    After dealing with this issue since a year ago. We just found a honest technicians telling us about this problem. I’m over 3K spended..How can I get involved. After that approvals.

  4. Mark says:

    My 2006 ML350 had its engine out last summer for a balance shaft replacement so I could pass a smog check. It wasnt done by the dealership, but Im glad to see Ill be getting some of my money back. Im defiantly a member of the class and looking forward to receiving notice.

  5. Kevin Collins says:

    My 2007 c230 is experiencing this exact problem. Shop wants $4500+ to repair. I am hoping this gets resolved soon. Does anyone know how to get involved or get help?

  6. Denise drews says:

    I have. 2006 c class, 50,000 mile and had to have the balance shaft replaced due to the check engine light that came on. Spent over $5300 for repairs, I honestly feel it’s not the end of issues. How do I get involved with this lawsuit?local Mercedes dealer useless. Help.

  7. Sonia says:

    I have a 2004 E320. I’m so glad that this class action has been approved by the court. It’s about time! I’m sure Mercedes Benz has always been aware of the mechanical issues with these engines. In fact, I’m having an ongoing issue with mine right now. My check engine light is on. I’ve also had to have motor mounts replaced twice in less than 5 years. I don’t even want another Mercedes Benz.

  8. Gay Farrell says:

    I own a 2006 C Class, just recently repaired because of check engine light, replaced thermostat although the technician said if it happens again is probably the balance shaft. This car has only 60,000 miles and has always been well maintained. Would this vehicle be included on the class action law suit and/or would Mercedes notify customers? Could anyone let me know your thoughts.

    1. Crystal Cole says:

      Same with me now the engine is shot kept the maintenance up on the car. Had coil pack and wiring replace 3 month ago and this week locked engine and some foolishness about manifold butterfly flap because it’s made of PLASTIC are you serious! MB should be ashamed.

      1. Crystal Cole says:

        I too need information on the class action suit

  9. sherry says:

    i spent 7600 two months ago having this issue repaired, not by a dealership however.

  10. Harold Haynie says:

    I am glad to see some progress made in this issue. My 06 ML350 has the engine out of the car an on a engine stand today. Hopefully this will resolved quickly.

1 2 3 6

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.