Michael A. Kakuk  |  February 22, 2017

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

General MotorsA class action lawsuit filed against General Motors alleges that 2010 through 2013 vehicles with “Generation IV 5.3 Liter V8 Vortec 5300 engines” are defective. The complaint asserts that “the piston rings, PVC system, and Active Fuel Management (‘AFM’) System used in the Class Vehicle’s engines were defective causing excessive oil consumption, premature spark plug degradation, and engine malfunction.”

Vehicles covered by the complaint include 2010-2013 models of the:

  • Chevrolet Avalanche,
  • Chevrolet Express 1500,
  • Chevrolet Silverado 1500,
  • Chevrolet Suburban,
  • Chevrolet Tahoe,
  • Chevrolet Colorado,
  • GMC Yukon,
  • GMC Yukon XL,
  • GMC Sierra 1500,
  • GMC Savana 1500, and the
  • GMC Canyon.

The GM oil consumption class action lawsuit states that oil is necessary for a car engine, but can be disastrous if it gets inside the combustion cylinder. The complaint notes that auto manufacturers use several items, including “valve guide seals and piston rings” to keep this from happening. According to the complaint, that is because if the seals fail, “it results in a loss of lubrication throughout the engine which, in addition to destroying the engine, may cause loss of power during acceleration, white or other colored smoke to be emitted from the exhaust, and the vehicle entering a ‘safe mode’ where the engine may suddenly shut-off or run improperly until the issue can be addressed by a mechanic.”

This is exactly what happens to the defective General Motors automobiles, the class action contends. The complaint asserts that first, defective piston rings allow oil to enter the engine’s combustion chamber, where it should not be. Second, the PCV system is in a defective location, also allowing oil into the combustion chambers. And third, a defect in the AFM system allows oil to gather in cylinders when they are not in use. The class action claims that these problems were made even worse by GM’s “oil life monitoring system,” which supposedly tracks oil consumption and tells drivers when they need to get a car’s oil changed.

Plaintiff Bradley Zierke states that he bought a new 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche. Zierke claims that he has to put oil into his vehicle every 1,000 to 1,500 miles, has had to replace spark plugs three times, and after only 87,000 miles he had to replace the entire engine. The complaint asserts that Zierke would not have purchased the truck had he known the truth about the oil defect.

Affected vehicles include the 2010-2013 models of the Chevrolet Avalanche, Express 1500, Silverado 1500, Suburban, Tahoe, and Colorado, and the GMC Yukon, Yukon XL, Sierra 1500, Savana 1500, and the Canyon.

The class action alleges that GM knew of these defects, and corrected the issues for 2014 model vehicles. The complaint notes that General Motors issued “at least seven Technical Service Bulletins from 2010-2013 to address Class Vehicles’ excessive oil consumption.” The class action asserts that despite this knowledge, and that the engine defects should have been covered by GM’s warranty, the auto manufacturer has failed to issue a recall or otherwise address consumers’ concerns.

The oil consumption defect lawsuit requests certification of a class of all people in the US who either currently own or lease a General Motors vehicle affected by the oil defect, or previously owned or leased such a vehicle and had to pay for extra maintenance or repairs. The class seeks restitution and damages, as well as an injunction stopping the unlawful conduct by GM.

Zierke is represented by David H. Grounds and Timothy J. Backer of Johnson Becker, PLLC.

The General Motors Oil Consumption Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Bradley K. Zierke v. General Motors LLC, et al., Case No. 0:16-cv-04170, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


591 thoughts onGM Class Action Alleges Engine Defect in 2010-2013 GMC, Chevrolet Autos

  1. Kimberly Miller says:

    We have a 2014 Equinox, same problem…always low on oil.

    1. Anton Thomas says:

      I don’t understand why Equinox is not on the list also. My 2010 does the same.

  2. Mallie LaFerney says:

    My husband has always said his GMC 2013 Sierra 1500 always run about a quart low after changing the oil. Would like more information on this please.

  3. J. Shipp says:

    The oil consumption problem with GM motors has been going on for alot longer than that. GM has always used defective oil rings and valve seals. What about the people whom bought those defective vehicle in the past? All of a sudden it was discovered? GM has been lying to its customers for years about oil use. GM never did care as shown by how long the ignored problem has been going on.

  4. Jodi Boulier says:

    I’m with all of the others. How do we find out more action or be part of the suit? I have a 2010 Tahoe….would like more information. Thank you.

  5. Katrina Gibbs says:

    I have a 2010 Equinox because I was driving around with no oil in my tank in my car was not informing me of the oil. The dealership had me go through an oil consumption test at everyone thousand miles. How can I get included in this lawsuit?

  6. elvira mitchell says:

    I’m having these same problems with my 2012 GMC Terrain. How can you get in this lawsuit.

  7. karen Roby says:

    2013 GMC Sierra has problems also

  8. Cheryl lasley says:

    I have a 2011 Equinox that went through GM’s oil consumption monitoring and it showed my vehicle was burning oil too fast. I was having to add oil every 3-4weeks or my engine would go dry. We planned to have it repaired the first part of January but it broke a rod which I understand is related to frequent low engin oil pressure. My engine was destroyed I had to pay 4900.00 for a new engine without any assistance from GM. This does not seem right since the problem came from a defect in their part. I would be interested in knowing if I could be included in this lawsuit and who I need to contact.

  9. Todd Peppers says:

    2008 yukon xlt has the Same problem!

  10. Jesus Salazar says:

    I too have the same problem with my 2008 suburban. I need to be included in this lawsuit

    1. James Carson Jr. says:

      I also have a 2008 suburban with the same problem these year models should be included in this lawsuit. We have spent close to 12000 dollars trying to fix this defect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.