Michael A. Kakuk  |  August 12, 2016

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Costco Wholesale store exteriorA class action lawsuit filed on August 10 alleges that Costco misled customers with its canned chicken breast, because the cans contain too much water.

The complaint accuses Costco of “unconscionable business practices and deceptive acts” because its Kirkland brand canned chicken states that it is “packaged in water,” when in reality almost half of the weight of the can is water, not chicken.

Plaintiff Howard S. Stern, a resident of New Jersey, describes the canned chicken as “swimming in a pool of water.”

He states that on May 14, 2016, he purchased a package of six cans of the Kirkland Signature Premium Chunk Chicken Breast specifically because it seemed like a good deal based on the size of the cans, each of which is two inches tall.

Stern asserts that when he got home and opened one of the cans, he was shocked at the amount of water inside, and checked all six cans because he thought it was a mistake.

The plaintiff claims that he dried and weighed the chicken, and found that there was between 7.4 and eight ounces of chicken in each 12.5 ounce can.

Stern says that his habit is to check “the unit price of products before he makes a purchase,” and according to the class action lawsuit that unit price was deceptive.

The Kirkland brand canned chicken cost $10.79, and advertised a price per pound of $2.30.

Since each can only contained roughly seven ounces of chicken, however, the class action contends that the actual unit price was closer to $4.11 per pound of chicken.

Had he known how little chicken was actually in the cans, Stern asserts that he would not have bought the package of six cans.

The Costco canned chicken deceptive advertising class action alleges that the Kirkland Premium Chunk Chicken Breast packaging also violates the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA).

The complaint states that the PPIA requires chicken products that advertise they are “packaged in water” must have at least 80% chicken in them; otherwise, the packaging must clearly state the percentage of water in the product.

Based on the PPIA, the complaint contends that either Costco should have increased the amount of chicken in each can, or the company should have changed the label to “Premium Chunk Chicken Breast Packed in 44% Water.”

Stern requests the court to certify a Class of “All citizens of the State of New Jersey who purchased Costco’s Kirkland Canned Chicken at any time from August 10, 2010, to the present.”

The class action seeks restitution and treble damages under New Jersey consumer protection laws. The lawsuit also seeks an injunction requiring Costco to stop its deceptive sales practices of its Kirkland Premium canned chicken.

Stern is represented by Jeffrey W. Herrmann and Peter S. Pearlman of Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP; and Patricia I. Avery, Matthew Insley-Pruitt, and Robert Plosky of Wolf Popper LLP.

The Costco Canned Chicken Deceptive Advertising Class Action Lawsuit is Howard S. Stern v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-04884, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

23 thoughts onCostco Class Action Alleges Excess Water in Canned Chicken

  1. cheryl cobb says:

    Yes I agree with them Fla. Too

  2. Addie Parnell says:

    I think the suit should include all states since the chicken is sold in every Costco.

  3. Patricia McFarland says:

    Why is this restricted to only New Jersey when Costco is country wide???

  4. Les Ferguson says:

    Because I live in California and this is Filed on behalf of citizens of New Jersey, am I excluded, even though I bought the same product here?

  5. Scott Connelly says:

    Are we sure it’s really chicken and not gull or squab? Maybe guinea fowl? After all, we are talking about what’s profitable here right? Bunch of clucks runnin’ things in the first place or these issues wouldn’t exist!

    1. Just Someone says:

      IDC what it is.. it’s still good! LOL

  6. Julie Glenn says:

    Since this is what we are having for lunch today I thought I would give this a try and weighed 2 cans of chicken individually , and found that there was only 7.1 ounces of chicken in each 12.5 ounce can. All i did was open the can drain the water from the can and give it a quick squeeze. it is disappointing to know that companies take advantage of its customers.. good chicken but stop ripping us off.. shame on you.

  7. Beth Stephens says:

    I had a similar experience with canned chicken at Sams Club.
    This was also 6 cans wrapped in a package.

  8. Shante L Jones says:

    Fill the cans with the correct amount of chicken.

  9. Linda Baker says:

    I agree; the chicken is very good; but entirely too much water in the can. I prefer the white albacore tuna. I shop a couple times each month at Costco for the past 7 years and noticed the increased price changes on several popular items. The fresh almonds in the bag a whopping $17.99 …just ridiculous!!! What happen to the miniature brownies that were $7.99….. Watch out Costco!!!

    1. Just Someone says:

      you can’t compare chicken and tuna that’s like comparing grapes and apples. You’re not going to use grapes in your pork chop recipe just like you wouldn’t use tuna in certain recipes that call for chicken. (gross!)

  10. Brenda Menist says:

    Yes! It is crazy how the volume is half. But it is very good chicken.

1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.