Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Happy Baby Organic Class Action Lawsuit Overview:
- Who: A federal judge consolidated class action lawsuits lodged against Nurture, Inc, the maker of Happy Baby Organic baby food.
- Why: The judge consolidated 17 separate class action lawsuits against Nurture alleging the company manufactured baby food containing an unsafe amount of toxic heavy metals.
- Where: The class action lawsuits are pending New York federal court.
A federal judge in New York consolidated 17 class action lawsuits filed against Nurture Inc. that allege the company manufactured its Happy Baby Organic brand of baby food with dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals.
The consolidation will only be for personal consumer protection claims against the company, U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Wednesday. Personal injury claims resulting from consuming the allegedly unsafe baby foods will be consolidated in a separate class action lawsuit.
Report Claims Toxins in Happy Baby Organic, Other Major Baby Food Brands
The class action lawsuits were filed after a February report by the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform found Nurture’s baby food contained higher than safe levels of toxic heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic.
All of the class action lawsuits filed against Nurture cite the House Committees report, including that of lead plaintiff Nicole Stewart, according to Law360.
Baby foods produced by Gerber, Plum, Hain, Sprout Foods, and Walmart were also mentioned in the report as having “significant levels,” of the toxic heavy metals. Class action lawsuits related to the house committee’s findings have also been filed against these companies.
Plaintiff Tyler Baker, who filed a class action lawsuit against Walmart earlier this month, claimed the company failed to warn or disclose to customers the toxic heavy metal content of its baby food.
“Based on Walmart’s product labeling and marketing materials, [they] did not expect, and no reasonable consumer would have expected, that any of Walmart’s baby food products contained Toxic Heavy Metals at unsafe levels,” Baker’s class action lawsuit states.
Are you concerned about your infant’s health after purchasing baby food from Nurture or another brand named in the House Committees report? Let us know in the comments!
The plaintiffs are represented by Stephanie Egner Smith of Roberts Law Firm US, PC, William E. Hoese, Douglas A. Abrahams, Craig W. Hillwig, Barbara Gibson, and Aarthi Manohar of Kohn, Swift, & Graf, P.C., David H. Fink and Nathan J. Fink of Fink Bressack, James Aliaga, Michael M. Liskow, and Janine Lee Pollack of Calcaterra Pollack LLP, and Lori G. Feldman of George Gesten McDonald PLLC.
The Nurture Baby Food Class Action Lawsuit is Stewart v. Nurture Inc., Case No. 1:21-cv-0121, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The Walmart Baby Food Class Action Lawsuit is Baker v. Walmart, Inc., Case No. 3:21-cv-00182, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- Walmart Baby Food Contains ‘Dangerous’ Levels of Toxic Heavy Metals, Class Action Claims
- Walmart Sells Discontinued, Cancer-Causing Baby Powder, Says Class Action Lawsuit
- Graco Booster Seat Class Action Lawsuits Get Green Light
- Sprout Baby Food Co Says Levels of Toxic Heavy Metals Found in Baby Food Meet FDA Regulations, Asks Federal Judge to Dismiss Class Action
51 thoughts onHappy Baby Organic Class Action Alleging Toxic Heavy Metals Consolidated in New York
Please please add me . My son LOVED these teething wafer crackers and at 3 was diagnosed with Austism and significant speech delay . He ate very healthy accept these happy baby crackers and products . I feel so sad that I failed him and didn’t look closer into these brands . He has yet to talk and is cognitively delayed in a lot of ways . I hope I can partake in this lawsuit
Please please add me . My son LOVED these teething wafer crackers and at 3 was diagnosed with Austism and significant speech delay . He ate very healthy accept these happy baby crackers and products . I feel so sad that I failed him and didn’t look closer into these brands . He has yet to talk and is cognitively delayed in a lot of ways . I hope I can partake in this lawsuit
How do we get added to this claim since our child has been eating these harmful foods. We want in.
Yes, please ad us. When had our son on this for over a year and he is now slow with his speech and behavioral issues. Playing with his toys consist of lining them up on one side of the room and then moving them and doing it on the other side of the room. and lining them up across the room and then moving them back.
Please add me too. We have been feeding our 1 year old Happy Baby products since he was 3 months old. I don’t know if or how these products affected my son, but several products on the list with very high heavy metals we have fed him.
Please add me. I have been giving the teethers to my baby girl.
Back in 2020 I purchased the cereal. Fed it to my son the first year thinking it was safer. Now he’s 3. He has speech delay, behavior issues, and other things. We have detoxed him (which has helped some) he’s been to therapy. I’m so disappointed but should have known better. Now because of the choice I made my son suffers. Thanks to happy baby for poisoning our children.