Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
A California federal judge has trimmed a class action lawsuit that alleges Acura vehicles are equipped with “HandsFreeLink” Bluetooth pairing devices with a defect that causes them to drain the car battery.
The HandsFreeLink devices allow drivers to use their cellphones to make calls without using their hands and was a feature that was heavily advertised in promotional materials for Acura vehicles. However, this convenient device allegedly fails to turn off when not in use and causes “parasitic” electrical drain.
U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar rejected American Honda Motor Co. Inc.’s bid to dismiss consumer protection and warranty claims from the Acura class action lawsuit. He found that the plaintiffs sufficiently argued that Honda fraudulently concealed the Acura HandsFreeLink defect.
Judge Tigar also found the plaintiffs sufficiently argued the alleged Acura defect was not detectable during diagnosis because the car battery failure was intermittent and mechanics had no reason to suspect the battery drainage was caused by the hands-free calling device.
The Acura hands-free calling device defect class action lawsuit was filed in August 2016 by a group of plaintiffs who claim Honda’s HandsFreeLink device that was installed in some Acura vehicles don’t switch off when not in use, resulting in car batteries being drained and some electronic parts failing prematurely.
The Acura class action lawsuit asserts federal and state consumer protection and warranty claims. On Monday, Judge Tigar agreed with Honda’s argument that some of these claims were filed too late under many state statutes that were listed in the complaint. However, he found that the claims of two California plaintiffs may proceed because they adequately alleged that Honda fraudulently concealed or delayed discovery of the Acura HandsFreeLink defect.
The judge found the Acura HandsFreeLink class action lawsuit sufficiently alleged that facts about the defect would not have been discovered by investigating the known battery defect.
Judge Tigar did dismiss the plaintiffs’ express warranty claims, pointing to circuit court holdings that express warranties that cover “materials or workmanship” do not cover design defects such as the alleged Acura HandsFreeLink defect at issue in the plaintiffs’ class action lawsuit.
The judge found that the Florida plaintiff did not purchase an Acura vehicle from a Honda dealership and dismissed the Florida implied warranty claims.
However, Judge Tigar found that Honda could be held liable for restitution even if it did not make any money off of the sale of used Acuras, and allowed the restitution claims to proceed. Further, he found that the plaintiffs’ equitable relief claims under unfair competition laws could move forward because they are not prohibited from seeking alternative remedies at this state in the litigation.
The plaintiffs are represented by James E. Cecchi of Carella Byrne Cecchi Olstein Brody & Agnello PC and Christopher A. Seeger, Stephen A. Weiss and Scott Alan George of Seeger Weiss LLP.
The Acura HandsFreeLink Battery Draining Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Aberin, et al. v. American Honda Motor Company Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-04384, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
140 thoughts onAcura ‘HandsFreeLink’ Defect Class Action Lawsuit Gets Trimmed
I have had 3 batteries go bad on my 2015 Acura RDX. Please add me to this lawsuit
same issue, i ended up ruining two battries due to this issue.
Hfl found to be the issue, please add me too to this issue.
I have the same problem with my 2009 MDX
I have a 2009 Acura MDX and the bluetooth has drained my alternator and a brand new battery. I have disconnected it because dealer said its gone bad and they don’t know why. I would like to be added to your list if no money is required on my part.
Add me to the lost I have a 2008 Accura MDX and the battery kept draining finally I looked it up and apparently there is a default in the hands free link so we turned the Bluetooth off and lo and behold no battery issues
Please keep me updated on this case. I have a 2014 Acura RLX and the battery dies frequently due to the so called “parasitic loss”. I would also like to join the class action if possible.
We have 2007 Acura MDX yes similar issue of battery drain. and dead HFL module Would like to see a recall fix too
I have a 2008 MDX. I have gone through several batteries, not to mention the frustration and inconvenience, before I discovered this is a very common issue with Acura’s. Please add me to this list.
I have a 2007 Acura Mdx, and have purchase several batteries and also alternators in trying to resolved the problems. please keep me posted.
Please add us to this lawsuit. We have a 2008 Acura MDX. We bought it used and learned about the defect when our navigation system went haywire and finally disconnected the HFL module. Soon after, our alternator, starter and battery all went out at the same time, as we were driving down the road. We want to sell it but then have to inform the buyer of the defect (that is the right thing to do). What a money pit!!!!
Just had HFL module replaced after 2 episodes of drained battery. Paid for repair but now I’m worried it could happen again. Pls keep me updated on this suit & how to join.
I have a 2007 Acura TL I am experienceing the same issues
I have complained to the dealership
Several times no response
Add my nMe to the list