Anne Bucher  |  December 12, 2017

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

JASON class action settlementTop Class Actions viewers are reportedly receiving checks in the mail from a class action settlement claiming JASON products were falsely advertised as being free of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). So far, all of the reported checks have been for $7.40.

If you filed a claim for the JASON sodium lauryl sulfate class action settlement, you may soon be receiving a check in the mail!

The JASON SLS class action lawsuit was filed by plaintiff Lori D. Gordon against The Hain Celestial Group and JASON Natural Products Inc. in August 2016. She accused the companies of negligent misrepresentation, breach of express warranty, unjust enrichment, and violations of New York’s False Advertising Law as well as New York’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

According to the JASON class action lawsuit, Hain and JASON deceptively marketed certain cleaning and personal care products as being free of the synthetic surfactant SLS.

SLS can reportedly result in irritation to the eyes, skin and respiratory tract. The JASON class action lawsuit also claims that the manufacturing process for SLS may create trace amounts of the possible carcinogen 1,4-dioxane.

On March 10, 2016, The Wall Street Journal reported that two independent laboratories tested the JASON products for the presence of SLS and found substantial amounts of the chemical. The defendants argued that the products included sodium coco sulfate, which is allegedly “plant-derived, meets our standard for gentleness, and creates a luxurious sudsy lather during use.”

However, many chemists reportedly agree that sodium coco sulfate is made up of approximately 50 percent SLS. Gordon alleges the products named in the JASON class action lawsuit were advertised as containing no SLS even though they contain sodium coco sulfate.

The defendants deny any wrongdoing and stand by their products but agreed to settle the JASON class action lawsuit to avoid the burden and expense of trial.

Hain Sodium FB 12-8-17

Hain Sodium FB 12-9-17

Hain Sodium FB 2 12-11-17

Hain Sodium check 12-8-17

Hain Sodium site 2 12-11-17

Hain Sodium site 12-8-17

Hain Sodium site 12-11-17

Class Members of the JASON sodium lauryl sulfate settlement include anyone who, between Aug. 17, 2011 and June 2, 2017, purchased any of the following products:

 

  • JASON Natural Product Long & Strong Jojoba Pure Natural Shampoo
  • JASON Volumizing Lavender Shampoo
  • JASON Normalizing Tea Tree Treatment Shampoo
  • JASON Dandruff Relief 2 in 1 Treatment Shampoo & Conditioner
  • JASON Smoothing Coconut Body Wash

 

Under the terms of the JASON class action settlement, eligible Class Members with proof of purchase could seek reimbursement of $8 per product purchased, up to a maximum of $40. Class Members without proof of purchase could file a claim for $2 per product purchased, up to a maximum of $10.

The deadline to file a claim for the JASON class action settlement passed on Sept. 18, 2017.

Congratulations to our Top Class Actions readers who submitted a valid claim and got PAID! If you missed out, sign up for our free newsletter to receive updates on new class action lawsuits and settlements. You can also check out which class action settlements are still accepting claims in our Open Class Action Settlements section.

Gordon is represented by Allen Carney and David Slade of Carney Bates & Pulliam PLLC.

The JASON Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Class Action Lawsuit is Lori D. Gordon v. The Hain Celestial Group, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-06526-GBF, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


4 thoughts onJASON Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Class Action Settlement Checks in the Mail

  1. Sasha says:

    $5.92 in WA

  2. Amalia Priestley says:

    7.40 n tx

  3. Jan says:

    $7.40 in CA 12/12

  4. PWS says:

    7.40 n TN 12/8

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.