Jessy Edwards  |  April 5, 2022

Category: Auto News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

toyota FJ Cruiser car green 2011
(Photo Credit: luizsantanna/Shutterstock)

Toyota 2007-2014 FJ Cruiser Class Action Overview:

  • Who: A dozen Toyota customers are suing the automaker. 
  • Why: The drivers say Toyota failed to disclose a dangerous defect in the frames of its model year 2007-2014 FJ Cruiser vehicles.
  • Where: The lawsuit was filed in California federal court.

Toyota didn’t tell customers its model year 2007-2014 FJ Cruiser vehicles have a dangerous defect that causes the vehicles’ frames to rust and corrode, a new class action alleges.

Ten plaintiffs, all Toyota owners, filed the class action complaint against Toyota Motor Corporation Apr. 4 in a California federal court, alleging violations of state and federal consumer laws. 

They say Toyota failed to disclose the “dangerous defect” in the frames of the vehicles and made misrepresentations regarding the true nature of those frames in its marketing and advertising campaigns.

“The excessive corrosion caused by the defect in the Class Vehicles poses a safety threat to both drivers and occupants of the Vehicles,” the class action states. “In fact, as a result of the defect, some Vehicles are no longer drivable, having failed to pass safety checks.” 

The plaintiffs allege that Toyota was well aware of the defects but did nothing to cure them. 

Instead, it went about marketing the vehicles in an expensive national campaign touting the advantages of the model when really they lack adequate corrosion protection, causing them to excessively and prematurely rust.

“The Defect not only reduces the value (including market value) of the Class Vehicle, but it subjects the Vehicles’ occupants to a significant safety risk,” the plaintiffs allege. “A vehicle’s frame forms the basis of a vehicle’s crashworthiness, including its ability to withstand or minimize damage to the occupant compartment in the event of an accident.”

Toyota Frame Lawsuit Claims Plaintiffs Discovered Defect After Purchase

The plaintiffs, all of whom own class vehicles with frames that have excessive and premature corrosion and rust, had no way of knowing the frames would rust, the class action alleges. They say it was only after they purchased their vehicles that the frame defect was revealed.

The plaintiffs are suing for fraudulent concealment, unjust enrichment and violations of the consumer protection laws of the states of Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Utah.

They’re looking to represent anyone in the United States who purchased a Toyota FJ Cruiser, model years 2007-2014, and seeking damages, fees, costs, interest and a jury trial. 

Meanwhile, Toyota was hit with a class action last month alleging it sells model year 2020-2021 Toyota Highlander vehicles with defective fuel tanks that can’t be filled to their advertised capacity.

Do you own a Toyota? Tell us your experience with the company in the comments.

The plaintiffs are represented by Scott Edelsberg of Edelsberg Law, PA, Jason H. Alperstein, Jeff Ostrow and Kristen Lake Cardoso of Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert; Lesley E. Weaver and Joshua D. Samra of Bleichmar Fonti and Auld LLP; and Steven G. Calamusa, Geoff S. Stahl, Rachel A. Bentley and Dennis O. Cohen of Gordon & Partners P.A. 

The Toyota FJ Cruiser Class Action Lawsuit is Elliot Nazos et al. v. Toyota Motor Corporation, Case No. 2:22-cv-02214, in the U.S. District Court Central District of California.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

71 thoughts onToyota Class Action Claims Automaker Didn’t Disclose Dangerous Defect in Cruiser Vehicles

  1. Russell says:

    Following. Keep me updated. Maybe we should make something on change.org

  2. Craig Gengler says:

    I have an 07 with undercarriage rust. Spent most of it life around St Louis and now north about 80 miles.

  3. Jose G Murillo says:

    Please add me
    Jgiomurillo@gmail.com
    2007 FJ

  4. Whitney says:

    I have an 07.

    1. LISA HAWKINS says:

      Please add me

  5. Steve Gaul says:

    I’m in AZ and I have two FJs, 2007 and 2008. The 2008 spent part of its life in MN and has plenty of rust.

  6. Phillip Rollins says:

    Keep me posted, I would like more info.

  7. Heather says:

    Add me

  8. Mark says:

    They should at least pay to have the FJs under coated

  9. Jonathan says:

    I want in

  10. Anthony says:

    Count me in.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.