Canine supplements class action lawsuit overview:ย
- Who: Brian Kelly filed a class action lawsuit against FoodScience LLC d/b/a VetriScience Laboratories.ย
- Why: Kelly argues VetriScience falsely advertises that its GlycoFlex canine joint support supplements are โclinically provenโ to treat all joint problems in dogs and increase hind leg strength.
- Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in New York federal court.
Pet supplement maker VetriScience falsely advertises that its GlycoFlexยฎ Plus and GlycoFlex Stage 3 canine joint support supplements are โclinically provenโ to treat all joint problems in dogs and increase hind leg strength, a new class action lawsuit alleges.ย
Plaintiff Brian Kellyโs class action lawsuit claims VetriScience never actually clinically tested the GlycoFlex canine joint support supplements, despite allegedly claiming such a test proves they treat all canine joint conditions in dogs and increase hind leg strength.ย
โPlaintiff seeks to redress VetriScienceโs unfair and deceptive marketing campaign built upon the misleading claims that it makes about GlycoFlex, and to obtain the financial recompense to which Plaintiff and his fellow class members are entitled,โ the GlycoFlex class action says.ย
Kelly wants to represent a class of consumers who in the state of New York purchased certain GlycoFlex canine joint support supplements manufactured, marketed, distributed and/or sold by VetriScience that it warranted as being clinically proven to alleviate joint issues in dogs.ย
GlycoFlex canine joint support supplements not clinically tested, class action claimsย
Kelly argues that, rather than conducting a clinical test, VetriScience only examined the GlycoFlex canine joint support supplements via a โself described โpilot studyโโ in 2006 involving only seven dogs who were allegedly โsubjected to an artificial, surgical and chemically induced โstable stifle OA [osteoarthritis] model.โย
โThe pilot study observed that only 3 of the 7 dogs โhad a significant improvement in lamenessโ and an average 41% increase in hind leg strength, meaning 4 of the 7 dogs had no significant increase in hind leg strength,โ the GlycoFlex class action says.ย
Vetriscience then waited approximately eight years to โtimidly claimโ in 2014 that the GlycoFlex canine joint support supplements were โclinically researched,โ before eventually โthrowing all caution to the windโ in 2018 by allegedly โboldlyโ claiming the 2006 study โclinically provedโ they were an effective treatment โfor all canine joint issues,โ the GlycoFlex class action alleges.ย
โObviously, if VetriScience believed that claim, it would have made it soon after the 2006 Pilot Study,โ the GlycoFlex class action says.ย
Kelly claims VetriScience is guilty of violating New York General Business Law. He demands a jury trial and requests monetary, statutory, actual and treble damages for himself and all class members.ย
In other recent news involving pet supplements, Stratford Care USA issued a recall for multiple brands of Omega-3 Supplements for cats and dogs earlier this year over worries they contained potentially elevated levels of Vitamin A.
Have you purchased GlycoFlex canine joint support supplements? Let us know in the comments.
The plaintiff is represented by James R. Denlea and Jeffrey I. Carton of Denlea & Carton LLP and Philip M. Smith of Kravit Smith LLP.ย
The Canine supplements class action lawsuit is Kelly, et al. v. FoodScience LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-06222, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Donโt Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
49 thoughts onCanine joint support supplements falsely advertised as clinically proven, class action claims
Please add me
Please add me
Please add me, joint pillโs killed my dog because at her age she sh
add
Please add me
Add Me
Please add
Please add me
Please add me.
Please add me.
wasted my money
Never helped my dogs at all