Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
UPDATE:
- This case was voluntarily dismissed Feb. 25, 2021.
A Florida woman has filed a class action lawsuit against the Clorox Company, claiming Clorox Splash-Less Bleach is not suitable for disinfecting.
Plaintiff Shana Gudgel says she purchased Clorox Splash-Less Bleach shortly after the World Health Organization’s declaration March 11, 2020, that COVID-19 was a pandemic.
However, Gudgel says, she only learned after making the purchase that the Clorox bleach product was unsuitable for disinfecting purposes.
“When The Clorox Company first began selling its splashless bleach product without adequately disclosing that it wasn’t suitable for sanitizing or disinfecting it was deceptive advertising, but in the midst of today’s pandemic it is a more serious matter,” the Clorox bleach class action lawsuit says.
Gudgel’s complaint claims Clorox has a reputation with consumers for being a “go-to” sanitizing and disinfecting product that has been used in hospitals, nursing homes, restaurants, schools and other facilities.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Clorox bleach’s disinfecting uses have become even more widespread, the class action lawsuit claims.
The complaint cites the example of Apple’s recent change to its device-cleaning protocol, which says Clorox wipes can be used to disinfect an iPhone.
In a recent Harris Poll Essential 100 poll, Harris surveyed more than 2,000 Americans as part of an assessment of businesses’ response to the pandemic and found respondents view Clorox as one of the country’s most essential companies.
The coronavirus’ primary mode of transmission is between people in close contact, most often via droplets produced when a person coughs, sneezes or talks, the complaint says. The droplets typically fall to the ground or onto surfaces.
Research conducted as of June has shown people may become infected after touching a contaminated surface, then touching their face, the complaint says, which means sanitizing and disinfecting are important to slow the virus’ spread.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that if a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection occurs, all areas such as bathrooms, common areas and shared electronic devices be disinfected, which can be done in several ways, the complaint says.
And while Clorox bleach is one of the most-used disinfectants in the U.S., the class action lawsuit states, there is a “critical” difference between the company’s regular formula and Clorox Splash-Less Bleach.
According to the class action lawsuit, Clorox associate director of brand engagement Rita Gorenberg told the Journal Inquirer the Clorox Splash-Less Bleach is formulated to have a higher viscosity “in direct response to consumer comments about bleach splashing when poured into washing machine dispensers.”
In adding the ingredients needed to increase the viscosity, Clorox altered the bleach’s concentration of sodium hypochlorite to a variable 1% to 5%, “which is not strong enough to sanitize and disinfect,” the complaint says. Regular Clorox bleach’s sodium hypochlorite concentration is between 5% and 6.5%.
The Clorox class action lawsuit says sodium hypochlorite is the active ingredient used for disinfecting, but is only capable of doing so in concentrations above 5%.
Gudgel’s complaint claims there has been growing confusion between the two products during the pandemic.
Consumers have allegedly taken issue with the Clorox Splash-Less Bleach formula’s slogan: “It’s the same Clorox product you love, now with more power per drop” and “10x Deep Cleaning Benefits,” the class action lawsuit says.
“Clorox’s choice to include the exact amount of the sodium hypochlorite on the regular product but exclude the percentage from the splashless variety is also a major cause for concern.”
Gudgel says the product “did not have the characteristics, benefits, or quantities as consumers were led to believe,” and had they known it was not suitable for disinfecting purposes, she and the Class Members would not have purchased it.
The Clorox class action lawsuit says the Clorox Company is in violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, the California False Advertising Law and the California Unfair Competition Law, and accuses it of negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.
The plaintiff demands a jury trial and seeks compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial; an injunction requiring the Clorox Company to stop its alleged deceptive practices; a declaration that the Clorox Company has committed the alleged violations; punitive damages; pre- and post-judgment interest; costs and expenses; attorneys’ fees; and any other relief the Court deems appropriate.
Have you bought Clorox Splash-Less Bleach believing it was suitable for disinfecting during the COVID-19 pandemic? Tell us about your experience in the comments.
The plaintiff is represented by Daniel Levinson and Justin Stockton of Levinson Stockton LLP; William Wright of the Wright Law Office LLP; and Daniel Faherty of Telfer, Faherty, & Anderson PL.
The Clorox Splash-Less Bleach Class Action Lawsuit is Shana Gudgel, et al. v. The Clorox Company, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-05712, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
EPA Approves Lysol as COVID-19 Killer
SafeHands Alcohol-Free Hand Sanitizer Can’t Kill 99.9% of Germs as Advertised
Uber Sexual Assault, Lyft Driver Rideshare App Lawsuit Investigation
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
1,901 thoughts onClorox Splash-Less Bleach Doesn’t Disinfect, Class Action Says
Please add me
Well that is so deceptive, I have purchased this product so many times thinking it was the same only splash less. All this time I am thinking that I was disinfecting my home?
Please add me.
I bought the bleach assuming as much.
I purchased the splashes Clorox also, not realizing it was not a disinfectant.
I been use it for years to add me on the list to.
Why would you assume anything! That’s why you always read the label. It’s not Clorox’s fault. Shame on all of you for trying to milk this company. That’s just like me suing a company for purchasing a product with gluten in it, knowing I’m gluten free. It’s my due diligence to read the labels and ingredients in it. Reading is fundamental!
My thoughts exactly! The lack of individual, personal responsibility in society is eroding integrity.
The label was missing critical information, such as the reduced level of concentration of sodium hypochlorite, the active ingredient used for disinfecting which is below disinfectant standards. That is the soul reason for my buying the product.
I highly doubt that anyone knows what disinfectant standards are, considering they didn’t even read the label to see that it says it doesn’t disinfect or sanitize. So the label missing critical information would not have made a difference.
Yes. Me and my family been using this product ever since the 1970’s. And I grew up smell it in my home. My mother told me that when you want sanity you will use Clorox.
I always thought this will disinfects and kills all germs. So if you can add my name to this claim will be great.
It’s the splashless not clorox itself.
People these days just want easy money. Then they complain when prices go up! Duh, Capt. Obvious-learn to read and comprehend.
Common sense tells you never to assume anything. Does it say it kills 99.9% of germs and bacteria on the bottle? Your box of cereal allows a certain amount of insect parts and other debris in it. Why not sue them. I know, the fruit and nuts cover the taste. Read the side effects of aspartame. That should really have some of you calling your lawyer.
My daughter told me years ago that it wasn’t a disinfectant like regular Clorox. I love Clorox products. Always read the labels on everything.