Anne Bucher  |  October 19, 2015

Category: Closed Class Actions

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

This settlement is closed!

Please see what other class action settlements you might qualify to claim cash from in our Open Settlements directory!

Subway Footlong

A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit alleging Subway sandwiches were falsely advertised as being six or 12 inches long, even though they were not the advertised length. If you bought a Subway six-inch or footlong sandwich between Jan. 1, 2003 and Oct. 2, 2015, your rights may be affected by the class action settlement.

Plaintiffs Nguyen Buren, John Farley, Vincent Gotter, Barry Gross, Jason Leslie, Ayanna Nobles, Charles Noah Pendrak, Andrew Roseman, Richard Springer and Zana Zeqiri allege that footlong sandwiches sold at Subway restaurants are marketed as being 12 inches in length, when in fact they are not 12 inches long. The plaintiffs allege that similar representations are made about the length of six-inch Subway sandwiches. According to the Subway class action lawsuit, these alleged business practices violate state consumer protection statutes.

Doctor’s Associates Inc., the franchisor of Subway stores, denies the allegations and maintains that its business practices and marketing are entirely lawful. However, it has agreed to settle the Subway sandwich class action lawsuit to avoid the risks, delay and costs of a trial.

The proposed Subway class action settlement will require Doctor’s Associates Inc. to make or to continue with certain changes regarding Subway six-inch or footlong sandwiches. No money is available to Class Members under the terms of the settlement.

Class Members who wish to object to the Subway class action settlement must do so no later than Dec. 16, 2015.

Who’s Eligible

Class Members of the Subway class action settlement include anyone who purchased a six-inch or footlong sandwich from a Subway restaurant between Jan. 1, 2003 and Oct. 2, 2015.

Potential Award

No money is available to Class Members under the terms of the Subway sandwich settlement. However, it does provide substantial injunctive relief.

If approved, the Subway sandwich settlement will require Doctor’s Associates Inc. (the company that sells franchises for Subway restaurants) to make changes that are meant to help ensure that Subway sandwiches are the advertised length.

Some of the changes agreed to under the terms of the Subway class action settlement include:

  • Requiring franchisees to use a tool for measuring bread, to ensure that the bread sold to customers is either six or 12 inches long;
  • Requiring regular inspections to be made to ensure that the baked bread is at least 12 inches long;
  • Requiring regular inspections of ovens to ensure they are in regular working order;
  • Increasing penalties for non-compliance for Subway restaurants that are found to be using bread that is not at least 12 inches long;
  • Updating all training materials, protocols and franchisee communications to require sandwiches to be at least six or 12 inches in length; and
  • Requiring franchisees to add the following notice in each Subway restaurant: “due to natural variations in the bread baking process, the size and shape of bread may vary.”
Proof of Purchase

N/A. Because this settlement only offers injunctive relief, no money is available. If the settlement is approved, Class Members will automatically benefit from the changes listed above.

Claim Form Deadline

N/A. Because this settlement only offers injunctive relief, no money is available. If the settlement is approved, Class Members will automatically benefit from the changes listed above.

Case Name

In re: Subway Footlong Sandwiches Sales and Marketing Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2439, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Final Hearing

1/15/2016

Settlement Website
Claims Administrator

Rust Consulting

Class Counsel

ZIMMERMAN LAW OFFICES PC
DENITTIS OSEFCHEN PC
LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN
EDELMAN COMBS LATTURNER & GOODWIN LLC
AGRUSS LAW FIRM LLC
ADEMI & OREILLY LLP
FARUQI AND FARUQI LLP
EVANS LAW FIRM PA
HIRSCH LAW FIRM PA
MARKS & KLEIN LLP

Defense Counsel

WIGGIN AND DANA LLP

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

32 thoughts onSubway Footlong Sandwich Class Action Settlement

  1. Roxy says:

    Its bread. Bread, with sodium-ridden meat, oil, cheese, that weird lettuce, and whatever else you ask them to slather on the bread. 12 inches unbaked, probably 11.58 or more, once it has been cooled off. Waste of time. Get mad about other things. Price of healthy foods that should be available to all people. Price of living. Scams that prey on our veterans, elderly, and shut ins. National debt. The fact that we fund war before funding our educational system. But yeah, hey, let us get mad at the dang bread.

  2. Tim says:

    They should have to make them 11 inches now!

  3. Moby Dick says:

    I can’t believe this. Their poster boy Jared is getting unlimited foot longs in prison and we get crapped on. Not right.

  4. lucille brisco says:

    I also agree we the cunsumers have paid hard working money and should be compensated somehow as said above Im sure the lawers have been paid. and didnt even buy subway.and I do have a job Grumpyduck get a life.

  5. April brewer says:

    He been cheating us for years an my husband love the colt sandwich an my kids an me love the turkey I’m upset

  6. Trent gardner says:

    I’ve been eating there for years along with mt family.

  7. Kat says:

    First- I am glad I found out about 10 years ago I have to eat gluten free, that leaves Subway out of the equation altogether, since the risk for cross contamination there is HUGE. Second- if they had any sense, they would have called them half and whole subs from the beginning so the actual inch measurement would not have been a factor. Go to any local carry-out, their menu has half and whole, with no measurements. I agree there should be a coupon reward in this for the consumers somewhere, especially given how many subs some eat, and since it was their own fault for not being just vague enough to avoid this sort of thing without being misleading.

  8. Julie Stevens says:

    It truly amazes me that one can get so ugly over a little bread when there are so many without. No one forced YOU to eat there in the first place.

    1. Kim R says:

      so what else is new

  9. J says:

    What a rip…with no compensation ??? Awful…

  10. Ahahaha says:

    OH MY GOD NO ONE CARES GIVE ME MONEY

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.