Brigette Honaker  |  November 13, 2020

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

A United Airlines discount may be discriminatory.

A recent class action lawsuit contends that United Airlines discount policies discriminate against older passengers in violation of California law.

In September 2019, United Airlines allegedly started to discriminate against their older customers by only providing a 10% discount to their customers between the ages of 18 to 22. Plaintiffs Fuiolevaga Riddick and David Pacheco were reportedly denied this discount simply because they “had the misfortune of being older than 22 years old.”

“Fortunate” United customers between the ages of 18 and 22 can reportedly receive the 10% discount by following and downloading the United Airlines app, signing up for a United MileagePlus account, and searching for flights through the app. This reportedly gives customers the option to select a “discounted travel (18-22)” filter and book these discounted flights on the app.

Both Riddick and Pacheco say they were unable to take advantage of this lucrative United Airlines discount due to their age.

“United’s Discount intentionally discriminated against Plaintiffs and other United customers based on their age, and the Discount constituted arbitrary, unreasonable, and/or invidious discrimination,” the United Airlines discount class action lawsuit.

Pacheco, a 67-year-old man, says he was forced to pay full price for his United Airlines ticket purchased in December 2019. Riddick is 23-years-old – only one year above United’s young flier discount range – and was also forced to pay full price for her tickets, according to the United Airlines discount class action lawsuit.

Both plaintiffs maintain that they followed all of the steps listed above, including downloading the app, signing up for a United MileagePlus account, and booking a flight through the app. However, due to their age, they say that they were not given the 10% United Airlines discount.

“It is especially troubling and more than a bit hypocritical that United’s divisive and exclusive Discount, which excluded consumers who were too old, violated United’s own Mission Statement that hypes United’s supposed commitment to diversity and inclusion,” the plaintiffs note in their United Airlines discount class action lawsuit.

The airline’s website touts this message with a statement from CEO Scott Kirby. According to Kirby’s statement, the company’s shared purpose “Connecting People, Uniting the World” includes investing in inclusivity for their business, employees, and customers.

A United Airlines discount may be discriminatory.In contrast with these “woke-worded and strategically-placed proclamations about inclusion and diversity,” the plaintiffs contend that Untied Airlines routinely discriminated against its older customers by denying them reasonable discounts.

“United’s trumpeted promise of inclusion and diversity, at least when it comes to its customers’ age, is empty, hollow rhetoric, mere virtue signaling,” the United Airlines discount class action lawsuit alleges.

Riddick and Pacheco claim that the denial of the 10% United Airlines discount to older customers is solely motivated by the efforts to maximize profits.

If the company fairly applied this discount to all customers regardless of age, their profits would reportedly be reduced. In an effort to maintain a higher profit margin, United Airlines allegedly discriminates against customers over the age of 22.

According to the plaintiffs, these actions violate California law prohibiting age discrimination including the state’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. This act affords all Californians the right to equal access to a businesses’ accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, services, and prices. According to the plaintiffs, this includes the United Airlines discount.

The plaintiffs seek to represent two Classes of consumers. First, they seek to represent a Class of Californians who used the United app between Sept. 10, 2019 and June 30, 2020 to purchase an economy ticket for air travel between Sept. 10, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2020 but were denied the 10% United Airlines discount. The second proposed Class includes similar customers subject to the same Class periods who intended to purchase the tickets but did not do so after encountering United’s terms and conditions which excluded them from the discount.

The proposed Class does not include employees, officers, and directors of United Airlines as well as any legal professionals involved in hearing or litigating the case.

On behalf of themselves and the proposed Class, the plaintiffs seek statutory damages, actual damages, court costs, and attorneys’ fees. They also seek injunctive relief preventing United Airlines from committing further discrimination.

Were you denied a United Airlines discount simply by virtue of your age? Share your experiences in the comment section below.

Plaintiffs and the proposed Class are represented by Alfred G. Rava of Rava Law Firm.

The United Airlines Discount Class Action Lawsuit is Fuiolevaga Riddick, et al. v. United Airlines Inc., et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-02148-H-KSC, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

16 thoughts onUnited Airlines Discount Discriminates Based on Age, Alleges New Class Action Lawsuit

  1. They passed the Law now live with it says:

    Cal. Civ. Code § 51.5
    Section 51.5 – Business discrimination
    (a) No business establishment of any kind whatsoever shall discriminate against, boycott or blacklist, or refuse to buy from, contract with, sell to, or trade with any person in this state on account of any characteristic listed or defined in subdivision (b) or (e) of Section 51, or of the person’s partners, members, stockholders, directors, officers, managers, superintendents, agents, employees, business associates, suppliers, or customers, because the person is perceived to have one or more of those characteristics, or because the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
    (b) As used in this section, “person” includes any person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, corporation, limited liability company, or company.

  2. Mr/Wayne Jenkins says:

    I will like to join this case because I have personal experience to also be a leading man in this case.

  3. Shaketa says:

    I wasn’t able to get the discount

  4. Janice Hill says:

    Yes I paid full price also, what do I do to sign up.

  5. Tiffany Stark says:

    Add me

  6. Mary dougherty says:

    Add me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.