New Bladder Sling Implant Failure Lawsuit Joins Ethicon MDL

For many women, the use of synthetic materials like polypropylene has led to numerous problems. A significant percentage of women are allergic to the plasticine substance. As a result, the mesh can cause inflammation or puncture organs, leading to vaginal mesh erosion, which can cause pain during sexual intercourse, ongoing infections and other medical concerns.

One issue that a significant number of plaintiffs mention is the relative strength of the polypropylene. Manufacturers like Ethicon marketed the devices as a better option to treat stress urinary incontinence because they last a year or two longer than those using biologic materials. That same longevity creates problems if a revision procedure is required to repair damage caused by bladder sling implant failure. Small-scale studies indicate that some women need as many as four corrective surgeries.

For others, the damage is permanent and can affect fertility and quality of life. Stories of lost wages due to an inability to work are not uncommon. Debra Alger’s complaint includes counts of negligence, manufacturing and design defects, various frauds, breaches of express and implied warranties and unjust enrichment.

The vaginal mesh implant failure lawsuit is Debra J. Alber v. Ethicon Inc., Case No. 13-cv-21788, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.

If you or someone you know face ongoing complications from this type of stress urinary incontinence treatment, get educated. Visit the Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation to learn more about legal options available to you. While there you can fill out the short form for a free case eligibility review. You may be able to pursue damages to offset medical bills and lost quality of life but it is important to act quickly to ensure you do not miss out on any potential legal remedy due to vaginal mesh uterine perforation side effects.