By Sarah Markley  |  December 20, 2016

Category: Legal News

power morcellator lawsuitWhen a woman elects to use power morcellation during a needed hysterectomy or myomectomy, she may be putting herself at risk for aggressive cancer.

However, a new power morcellator device by maker Olympus may not be as risky as previous models.

In November 2016, Olympus announced it received a Food and Drug Administration 510(k) approval for a new power morcellator device.

The FDA 510(k) is a premarket submission to demonstrate that the device to be marketed is at least safe and effective. It does this by comparing the device to an already legally marketed device.

Olympus won the approval for its laparoscopic PK morcellator with tissue containment.

New Power Morcellator Device vs. Older Models

A power morcellator is a removal device for tissue such as fibroids or the uterus in the case of a hysterectomy. They have been promoted as more effective and requiring less recovery time than earlier procedures.

However, experts claim that women with undetected uterine sarcoma can be put at risk for aggressive cancer. The power morcellator device ruptures the uterine wall and can spread cancer cells throughout the abdomen.

It is estimated that 1 in 350 women who undergo power morcellation procedures may have undiagnosed sarcoma and are at risk of developing leiomysarcoma.

The new power morcellator device by Olympus includes the proprietary PneumoLiner contained tissue extraction system.

Dr. Arnold Advincula of Sloane’s Women’s Hospital said recently in a press release, “Contained tissue extraction is continually evolving. As surgeons, it is our duty to evaluate potential solutions to the surgical challenges we face in clinical practice.”

“We are pleased that Olympus has taken the initiative to develop a unique and well tested system designed specifically to facilitate the option for a laparoscopic approach in women who are at a low risk of having an unexpected malignancy at the time of surgery,” Dr. Advincula said regarding Olympus’ new power morcellator device.

Olympus mentioned that the new device should not be used if a woman who is peri- or post-menopausal has suspected uterine fibroids. They also warned against use in patients for en bloc tissue removal vaginally or via mini laparotomy.

The new power morcellator device is also not suggested for use in women with known malignancies.

Even though Olympus is hopeful about their new power morcellator device, power morcellators have been the subject of controversy. Earlier this year, maker Johnson & Johnson looked to settle hundreds of product liability and wrongful death lawsuits brought over now-recalled power morcellators.

Additionally, in April 2014 the US Food and Drug Administration issued a warning about power morcellators and conducted a special advisory panel to consider discontinuing their use.

In November 2014, the FDA issued black box warnings for all power morcellator devices.

Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The morcellation cancer attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual lawsuit or class action lawsuit is best for you. [In general, morcellator cancer lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.] Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.

Learn More

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Get Help – It’s Free

Join a Free Morcellation Cancer Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer in the uterus, pelvis or abdomen within two years of undergoing surgery for a myomectomy (removal of fibroids), hysterectomy (removal of the uterus), oophorectomy (removal of the ovaries), or salpingectomy (removal of fallopian tubes), you may have a legal claim. See if you qualify by filling out the short form below.

An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.

Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.