Netflix lawsuit overview:
- Who: Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a lawsuit against Netflix Inc.
- Why: Uthmeier alleges Netflix misled consumers about its data collection practices.
- Where: The Netflix lawsuit was filed in Florida state court.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed a lawsuit against Netflix, alleging the streaming giant misled consumers about its data collection practices.
Uthmeier claims Netflix misled consumers into believing that, by paying a monthly subscription fee, they were choosing a different business model — one funded by subscribers instead of the behavioral surveillance that fuels targeted advertising.
“Netflix conveyed the impression that its subscription service insulated users from surveillance-driven advertising and extensive data collection,” the Netflix lawsuit says.
“Consumers accepted that bargain, paid Netflix monthly subscription fees from Florida and generated years of sensitive behavioral data within the context of Netflix’s repeated assurances,” the lawsuit states.
In reality, Netflix built a large-scale behavioral telemetry and logging system designed to collect granular user data, including viewing activity, browsing patterns, device signals and other behavioral information through children’s and adults’ profiles, Uthmeier claims.
Netflix allegedly used customer data to build ad ecosystem, lawsuit claims
The Netflix lawsuit alleges that the company used surveillance infrastructure to build the behavioral ads ecosystem it promised users it never would.
In November 2022, Netflix launched its advertising business and deployed years of subscriber data to power the surveillance-driven advertising business consumers paid Netflix to avoid, the lawsuit claims.
Netflix’s alleged misrepresentations were material and likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances to the consumers’ detriment, Uthmeier argues.
Netflix promised Floridians a straightforward streaming experience — “no ads, no exploitation, no ‘serving two masters,'” the lawsuit says.
But behind that promise, the Attorney General’s Office alleges Netflix built a platform engineered to maximize screen time through manipulative design, quietly amassing behavioral data before feeding it into the broader tech industry’s data pipeline.
“Netflix never gave Floridians a fair chance to understand what they were signing up for, and it never gave Florida parents a fair chance to protect their children from it,” the complaint states.
Uthmeier asserts claims for violations of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Florida Digital Bill of Rights. He seeks a jury trial and requests a permanent injunction to prevent Netflix from engaging in the allegedly unlawful practices, civil penalties and attorneys’ fees.
Meanwhile, the state of Texas is also suing Netflix, alleging the company secretly harvested and sold users’ viewing data despite promising not to engage in data-driven advertising practices.
What do you think about the allegations made in this Netflix lawsuit? Join the discussion in the comments.
The state is represented by James Uthmeier, Ryan D. Newman, Jason Hilborn, Henry Q. Johnson, Victoria Ann Butler and Sasha Funk Granai of the Florida Attorney General’s Office and Christopher R. Cooke, Joseph M. Graham Jr., Jeffrey S. Wolff, Marc B. Collier and Julie N. Searle of Norton Rose Fulbright.
The Netflix lawsuit is Florida v. Netflix Inc., Filing No: 256635678, in the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit in and for St. Johns County, Florida.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
Minecraft lawsuit investigation: Families impacted by video game addiction
September 16, 2026 | Lawsuits to Join
