Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Facebook, FTC, antitrust, monopoly
(Photo Credit: ada Images/Shutterstock)

Facebook Antitrust Lawsuit Overview: 

  • Who: Facebook responded to the Federal Trade Commission’s opposition to its latest motion to dismiss a lawsuit the agency has filed against it. 
  • Why: The FTC claims Facebook has committed antitrust violations by monopolizing the social networking market.
  • Where: The lawsuit is being heard in District of Columbia federal court.

Facebook has responded to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) latest attempt to keep alive an antitrust lawsuit against the social networking company. 

Facebook, which recently changed its name to Meta Platforms Inc., argues the FTC’s monopolization claims rely on “inapposite statistics” and are only speculative assumptions. 

“The FTC did not state a valid claim before; it still has not stated a valid claim,” the company said. “Its case should now be dismissed with prejudice.”

The response comes after the FTC has opposed the company’s motion to dismiss with the agency arguing it has already adequately pleaded that Facebook participates in antitrust activities. 

Facebook, however, claims the FTC cannot plausibly establish the central points of its claims and that it has no factual support that the company is able to raise prices or restrict output in the social networking services market. 

“After an exhaustive pre-filing investigation, and examination of commercial data sources, the FTC has no measure of or means of measuring how much time people spend on Facebook or any other service in activities that constitute (personal social networking services), which neither Facebook nor any other industry participant recognizes, uses or tracks,” the company said.

Lawsuit Claims Facebook Has a Monopoly On The Social Networking Market

In its lawsuit, the FTC claims Facebook has monopolized social network services, namely by acquiring WhatsApp and Instagram, Law360 reports. 

Facebook argued in its motion to dismiss, however, that it is only speculative that consumers could have superior products if the company had not purchased Instagram or WhatsApp.

The FTC had its initial complaint dismissed in June after a judge ruled the agency failed to allege more than just that Facebook owned a large share of the market, Law360 reports. 

The agency included more statistics in an amended complaint, including data and metrics related to the time users spent on the platform each day and month, Law360 reports. 

A class action lawsuit was filed against Facebook last month by a consumer claiming the company injured investors by not disclosing allegedly harmful business practices

Do you believe Facebook has monopolized the social networking market? Let us know in the comments! 

The Facebook Antitrust Lawsuit is FTC v. Facebook Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-03590, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. 


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

28 thoughts onFacebook Cries Foul On FTC’s Bid To Nix Dismissal Of Antitrust Lawsuit

  1. sophia lynn lewis says:

    add me

  2. Jody Sykes says:

    Facebook is notorious in selective applying their community standards restrictions, account bans and censorships, especially against conservative voices and Christian follower’s beliefs, while intentionally allowing racial hatred, misinformation, targeted algorithm posts, violent content, and cyber bullying posts to have free viral propaganda without apply those same restrictions across their platform. Even Facebook Fact Checkers are not transparent in their decisions, but very much opinionated to their funding sponsorship’s interests. Please add me in this lawsuit in violation of Section230.

    1. Norma J Dofflemyer says:

      Add my name..Facebook allowed false profiles, never even bothered to check identities…A female has fake profile and was popping up continuously via instant messenger!!!!

  3. SharonC says:

    Add me

  4. SharonC says:

    Add me

  5. Storme says:

    Add me

  6. Chad Desorcie says:

    add me

  7. clara marshall says:

    TRUE

  8. Lisa Sharp says:

    This is 100% true problem on Facebook

  9. Ericka Acquilano says:

    Add me

  10. Heidi Humphreys says:

    add me

1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.