Tracy Colman  |  August 2, 2018

Category: Consumer News

Man Files Recent Denied Disability Claim Lawsuit Over Unfair LTD Benefits DenialA new disability insurance lawsuit was filed against Unum Life Insurance Company of America in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on July 19, 2018.

The complainant in this disability lawsuit is plaintiff Rebecca R., a citizen of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and resident of the City of Randolph. Rebecca is a former employee of the State Department of Public Health in the capacity of Environmental Analyst 3.

According to the factual section of the disability insurance lawsuit, Rebecca held her Unum disability insurance and faithfully paid all premiums due on the account since approximately 2002. The policyholder was the Group Insurance Commission of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Rebecca’s disability insurance lawsuit further elaborates that she was unable to continue to perform the duties of her occupation for the state as of May 19, 2014. The complainant suffered brain damage attributed in part to a craniotomy procedure. A craniotomy is a medical intervention in which part of the skull is removed to access the brain for surgical purposes. The plaintiff was also known to suffer from seizures.

On Oct. 24, 2014, according to the narrative in the disability insurance lawsuit, Unum began paying disability benefits to the plaintiff under a diagnosis of mental illness rather than attributing her symptoms to physical causes.

Under the stipulations of the policy in question, mental illness benefits are paid for two years and related diagnoses are defined as stemming from psychosis, emotional, behavioral or stress-modulating disorders.

The 24 months past and Rebecca’s benefits ceased to be paid on Aug. 31, 2016. At this point, the plaintiff filed appeals according to protocol, but her requests were denied.

In her story outlined in the disability insurance lawsuit, Rebecca claims that Unum relied upon the professional opinion of their in-house psychologist who never examined her and who has a history of attributing brain function issues to “emotional problems” rather than acknowledging the organ as capable of disease in and of itself.

The plaintiff alleges that the psychologist claimed behavioral causes and failed to attribute any of her problems to meningioma and ongoing seizures.

A meningioma is a tumor which grows on the surface membranes of the brain and—although often benign—can exert significant pressure and affect the senses. It is not uncommon to have visual disturbances, hearing loss, seizures and frequent headaches with the condition.

Rebecca filed her disability insurance lawsuit to attempt to reinstate her benefits in the face of this purportedly biased review on the part of Unum. She is bringing several counts against the defendant including Breach of Contract, Violation of Massachusetts General Law (MGL) C.93A and C. 176D; and Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.

Rebecca is asking for a trial by jury with an award of punitive, treble and compensatory damages that includes prejudgment and postjudgment interest, costs of suit including attorney fees. She also demands full reinstatement of her disability benefits.

The Unum Disability Lawsuit is Case No. 1:18-cv-11510 in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The bad faith insurance attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual lawsuit or Unum class action lawsuit is best for you. [In general, Unum bad faith lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.] Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.

Learn More

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Get Help – It’s Free

Get Help With Your Long Term Disability Insurance Appeal

If you were denied a disability claim or had your disability benefits terminated without reason, you may be able to take legal action against the insurer. See if you qualify by filling out the short form below.

An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.

PLEASE NOTE: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client or getting you dropped as a client.

  • The law firm responsible for the content of this page is:
    LegaFi Law LLC (an Arizona law firm)
    legafi.com
    888-4-LegaFi
    and
    Marc Whitehead & Associates Attorneys at Law, LLP
    disabilitydenials.com
    954-462-6700
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Please note that if you were not denied by at least one of these companies, you will not qualify for this investigation.
  • We tell you about cash you can claim every week! Subscribe to our free newsletter today.

    By submitting information to Top Class Actions you agree that the information you submit, including your phone number and email address, will be shared with and used by Top Class Actions, LegaFi Law LLC (an Arizona law firm) / 888-4-LegaFi / legafi.com, and Marc Whitehead & Associates / 713-228-8888 / www.disabilitydenials.com, their agents, and their co-counsel, if any, to contact you. You understand that this authorization overrides any previous registrations on any federal or state Do Not Call registry(ies). While your communications with a lawyer may be subject to the attorney-client privilege, communications through this website may not be because Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Please do not share any confidential or privileged information through this website. Top Class Actions or the attorney(s) or their agent(s) with whom your information is shared may be ordered by a court of law to produce your information in certain legal situations. Also, you are not formally represented by a law firm unless and until a contract of representation is signed by you and the law firm.*

    By checking this box, I consent to receive from Top Class Actions, and the lawyer, their agents or their co-counsel sponsoring this investigation, marketing emails, calls or texts sent by automatic telephone dialing systems, artificial/prerecorded voice messages, and/or otherwise. I understand that this authorization overrides any registrations on any Do Not Call registry(ies). I understand that consent is not a condition of purchase, and that I may opt out at any time. Review Top Class Actions’ Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy here.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.