Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Plastic containers of Gerber's brand 2nd stage baby foods on a grocery store shelf, Butternut Squash and Sweet Potato flavors.
(Photo Credit: Sheila Fitzgerald/Shutterstock)

Gerber Baby Food Non-GMO Class Action Lawsuit Overview: 

  • Who: Faith Norman filed a class action lawsuit against Gerber Products Company.
  • Why: Norman claims Gerber falsely advertises its baby food products as “Non-GMO.”
  • Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in California federal court.

Gerber Products Company falsely advertises its baby food products as “Non-GMO,” a new class action lawsuit alleges.

Plaintiff Faith Norman claims Gerber is “cheating” consumers by mislabeling baby food products that do in fact contain genetically modified organisms. 

Norman wants to represent a nationwide Class and California subclass of consumers who have purchased Gerber baby food mislabeled as “Non-GMO.” 

Norman claims Gerber’s baby food is “loaded” with ingredients that come from genetically modified crops like corn and soy, as well as protein and dairy from cows that have been fed GMOs. 

Gerber also has a number of artificial ingredients that were “genetically engineered in a laboratory,” the class action lawsuit alleges. 

Norman says she relied on Gerber’s representations that its baby food was “Non-GMO” when she decided to purchase its Good Start 2 baby formula on multiple occasions. 

Had Norman known the claims on Gerber’s labeling, packaging and marketing materials was “false and misleading,” however, she says she would not have purchased the product. 

“These representations were part of the basis of the bargain in that she would not have purchased the Products, or would not have purchased them on the same terms, if the true facts had been known,” the class action lawsuit states. 

Gerber Intentionally Mislabels Baby Food To Make It More Desirable, Plaintiff Claims

Norman claims Gerber intentionally mislabels its baby food products as “Non-GMO” in order to make them appear more desirable for a growing number of health-conscious consumers.

“The market for all natural foods has grown rapidly in recent years, and Defendant seeks to take advantage of this trend through false advertising,” the class action lawsuit states.

Norman argues consumers want to avoid food products containing GMOs for a variety of reasons, including personal health and environmental concerns. 

“Many consumers, including Plaintiff, try to buy products that are not derived from GMOs, and a movement has developed demanding consumer products that are non-GMO products,” the class action lawsuit states. 

Norman claims Gerber is guilty of unjust enrichment and fraud, among other things, as well as in violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act

Plaintiff is demanding a jury trial and requesting relief in the form of compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages for herself and all class members. 

A separate class action lawsuit was filed against Gerber in October over claims the company sells baby food containing dangerously high levels of toxic heavy metals

Have you purchased Gerber baby food that has been labeled as Non-GMO? Let us know in the comments! 

The plaintiff is represented by L. Timothy Fisher, Sean L. Litteral and Julia K. Venditti of Bursor & Fisher, P.A. 

The Gerber Baby Food Non-GMO Class Action Lawsuit is Norman v. Gerber Products Company, Case No. 5:21-cv-09940, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

108 thoughts onGerber Class Action Claims Company Falsely Advertises Its Baby Food As ‘Non-GMO’

  1. Tanyshia Clark says:

    Please add me my baby is 18 months. Truly disappointing to know that what you see marked is not what you get.

  2. Lauren says:

    YES! Add me please! I have 2 at 8 months old & 1 who just turned 2 !!

  3. Deszeree Jackson says:

    My son is currently 14 months and that is all I would give him was Gerber foods from cereal, formula , baby food ect and I just really hope his system is not messed up because I’ve been struggling to get him to really eat well since he was 3 months

  4. Jennifer Morgan says:

    Please add me, thank you!

  5. GWENDOLYN JENKINS says:

    Please add me.

  6. Michael Ray Outfleet says:

    Please add me!

  7. Alicia hilliard says:

    Add me please

1 9 10 11

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.