Anne Bucher  |  June 7, 2018

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

On Tuesday, an Illinois federal judge issued an order directing the transfer of a class action lawsuit over alleged Hyundai and Kia engine defects to California federal court, where similar lawsuits are currently pending.

Plaintiff Andrea Smolek and defendants Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motors America Inc. jointly asked the court to transfer the engine defect class action lawsuit to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California so that it could be coordinated with three related cases.

“As the parties have stipulated to transfer to the Central District of California, and in light of the related proceedings already pending there, it appears a transfer would serve both the convenience of the parties and the interests of justice,” U.S. District Judge Marvin E. Aspen wrote in his order.

The Illinois class action lawsuit was filed by Smolek in April, just a few months after an $8.59 million class action settlement with Hyundai in California. Smolek seeks to represent a Class of Illinois residents who owned or leased Kia and/or Hyundai vehicles with Theta II engines that were not subject to recalls by the motor companies.

Smolek says she bought a new 2015 Kia Sorento LX in the Chicago area in 2014. Less than two years after the purchase, she says she heard loud noises coming from the engine which were “punctuated by a loud bang, the violent shaking of her vehicle, and the illumination of the check engine light on the instrument panel.”

When she took her vehicle to a Kia dealership, a technician checked the engine and told her the vehicle’s oil had turned to sludge, the Kia class action lawsuit says. The technician blamed the issue on Smolek never changing the vehicle’s oil even though she produced documentation to show the oil had been changed in accordance with Kia’s guidelines.

According to the Kia engine defect class action lawsuit, Kia denied Smolek’s warranty claim. Kia reportedly agreed to inspect the engine but would charge her $1,000 if the technicians could not find a defect. She was also reportedly told that the vehicle’s engine needed to be replaced before she left the dealership or her warranty would be voided.

Smolek says she felt that she had no other option and purchased a new engine from the Kia dealership for $6,000. To pay this cost, she says she took out two high-interest loans.

The Kia class action lawsuit claims that the engine defect arises from a design flaw in the Theta II engine, which allows contaminants to enter the engine’s fuel injection system. The contaminants cause the oil to thicken and the engine to fail.

Hyundai reportedly recalled vehicles with the Theta II engine in September 2015 and March 2017, claiming the issue was related to metal debris that was left in the engine during the manufacturing process, not an engine defect. Kia recalled vehicles with the Theta II engine in March.

Hyundai and Kia reportedly recalled about 1.66 million vehicles in North America. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration subsequently initiated an investigation into the Hyundai and Kia recall.

Smolek is represented by Stacy Bardo of Bardo Law PC.

The Hyundai, Kia Engine Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Andrea Smolek v. Hyundai Motor America (Corporation), et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-02716, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

48 thoughts onHyundai, Kia Engine Defect Class Action Transferred to Calif. Court

  1. Joyce beewer says:

    I have a 2012 soul and had to get a engine in August. Had only 82,000 miles.

  2. Lola says:

    I have a 2016 Kia Optima LX

  3. Lola says:

    Include me as well, the dealership told me I needed to replace my engine due to burning too much oil and we don’t even know where it is going but I have documentation to prove it was taking VERY GOOD CARE OF!

    1. Tamika Miller says:

      Same here for me

  4. ROSETTA ELIZABETH STEELE says:

    The very same thing just happened to me. I have a 2016 Kia Rio, I know they also have the Theta II engine, Why aren’t they included in the suit? These engines use oil at an unbelievable rate and once they stop working even with oil changes, Kia will deny there is a problem with the engine. If there was an engine recall I was never notified.

  5. T. Schoeben says:

    Include me!! I have a 2012 Sorento, less than 85,000 miles on it. Took it to the dealership for this issue and recalls. The dealership gave a a list of things needing done, but didn’t find issue with engine the 1st time in. Had to wait for a month to get airbag clock spring to come in for replacement. Started to hear knocking noise when starting. Didn’t want to case more damage so rented a car for a week. This all started Oct. Nov. 10 year mark for purchase of car was Nov 25th. The dealership had my car for 3 weeks, luckily they gave me a loaner. Called and left messages stating that I thought it was under warranty and I wanted them to check into that. No response for 3 weeks. Next time I hear from them they have fixed the clock spring, engine is shot and Kia wont replace it. The dealership can replace it will a like motor (same mileage) IF they can find a motor. It will cost $10,000. What happened to the 10 years/100,000 warranty??? Dealership said its 6 years 60,000. Not cool to pay $36,000, 10 years ago to have for a car that the motor can’t even make it to 100,000 miles.
    Defect in a motor is a defect in a motor. They should be replacing all of them not just the ones that will cause fires!!

  6. Robin Kelly says:

    I just picked up my car from a shop down the street having to pay 6 grand to replace the engine as the old one went south as my husband was driving home from work. It sucks too because I have 2 payments left on it

    1. Robin Kelly says:

      To add to this I had taken it to Kia for drinking oil and when I called a service writer told me the class action was only for certain things on the engine not for oil and the whole engine problem

  7. Lisanancy says:

    This is a Nice Blog, Thanks For sharing your knowledge!! I replaced my outdated KIA car engine with a Used KIA Engine from Autopartsmiles. Now my cars performance is very smooth.

  8. Farzy Givekay says:

    I just had my KIa Sportage 2014 and 140000 miles engine die. How to I join this class action suit.

  9. Valerie Gresham says:

    Add me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.