Brigette Honaker  |  March 19, 2018

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

man looking at phone, robocallsJPMorgan Chase has agreed to a $2.25 million payout as a part of their Chase robocalls class action settlement.

The Chase robocalls class action settlement has been sent to a Georgia federal court for preliminary approval to resolve this robocall class action lawsuit.

Plaintiffs Tomeka Barrow and Anthony Diaz claim that Chase violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by autodialing hundreds of thousands of customers after the plaintiffs verbally requested the calls to stop. The TCPA class action lawsuit alleges that 242,000 customers received robocalls from Chase in an attempt to collect on mortgage and home equity line of credit accounts.

In the original class action lawsuit, Barrow alleged that she verbally told a Chase representative that she only wanted to be contacting via written communications. Despite this communication, she claims, she was contacted at least five more times via autodial after that date.

The plaintiffs proposed a Class of individuals in the U.S. “to whom JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., or any affiliate or agent acting on its behalf, made one or more telephone calls to a cellular telephone through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system or a prerecorded or artificial voice on or after April 20, 2012, through the date of preliminary approval, regarding a mortgage or home equity line of credit account and who, prior to being called, orally requested that they not be called by JPMC.”

According to the settlement motion filed on Feb. 23, Chase has denied any violation of TCPA and has indicated that it would have challenged any attempt to certify the proposed Class.

The Chase robocalls class action settlement was proposed as a way to avoid going to trial on the issues alleged in the lawsuit. Moving forward with the legal process would pose risks to both the plaintiffs and Chase. “The real possibility of losing at trial further makes this settlement an acceptable compromise,” the motion states. Should the case go to trial, JP Morgan would also face the risk of paying significantly more in damages.

Under the TCPA, Barrow, Diaz, and the proposed settlement Class may have been entitled to statutory damages of $500 to $1,500 for any “knowing and/or willful” violations. As proposed in the settlement, Class Members would receive around $101 per claim in the settlement, which the parties say is “fair, appropriate, and reasonable given the purposes of the TCPA and in light of the anticipated risk, expense, and uncertainty of continued litigation.”

According to the motion, the counsel for the proposed class plans to apply for attorney’s fees up to 30 percent of the settlement fund along with court costs up to $40,000.

The Chase Robocalls Class Action Settlement is Barrow, et al. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Case No. 1:16-cv-03577, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

UPDATE: May 2018, the JPMorgan Chase robocall class action settlement is now open. Click here to file a claim.

Join a Free TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you were contacted on your cell phone by a company via an unsolicited text message (text spam) or prerecorded voice message (robocall), you may be eligible for compensation under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Get a Free Case Evaluation Now

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


4 thoughts on$2.25M Chase Robocalls Class Action Settlement Proposed

  1. Lorenzo Artis says:

    Why do I have to provide SSN received an email today

  2. Jennifer Patrice Mack says:

    Please advise why a W9 is required ? I received an email stating that the deadline for W9 is 08/13/18

  3. JoAnne Kustenmacher says:

    Please add me. I have Chase

  4. Torrin Oreacy Perry says:

    add me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.