Anne Bucher  |  July 28, 2017

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

centurylink_logoCenturyLink Inc. and related entities are facing a class action lawsuit filed by a group of plaintiffs who accuse them of systematically overcharging customers.

CenturyLink is a global communications company that connects customers to the digital world, the CenturyLink class action lawsuit alleges. It provides phone and data transmission services, including telephone, television and high-speed internet, to residential and commercial consumers throughout the United States.

Plaintiffs Francisco J. Carrillo, Jocelyn Carrillo, Spencer Berggren and James T. Fowler filed the CenturyLink class action lawsuit last week in Florida federal court.

According to the CenturyLink class action lawsuit, a whistleblower complaint was filed in June by a former CenturyLink employee who claims she was terminated for reporting allegedly unlawful billing practices to her supervisors and the company’s CEO.

The CenturyLink employee claims that CenturyLink implemented an incentive program for employees and agents to encourage them to overcharge customers for services and/or to charge them for services they did not order. The plaintiffs allege that the whistleblower complaints are consistent with the experiences of numerous consumers who claim they were misled by CenturyLink.

“Fee generation is at the heart of Defendants’ business model,” the CenturyLink class action lawsuit alleges. “At all relevant times, Defendants sought to maximize the number of services for which they could bill customers in the Class. Defendants had a financial incentive to employ and continue such incentive programs, as it increased their revenues and profits.”

Some of the allegedly unlawful billing practices listed in the CenturyLink class action lawsuit include billing customers for service items or phone lines that were never requested by the customer; billing customers at higher rates than they were quoted during sales calls; charging early termination fees when customers cancelled services due to the higher rates; and collecting excessive and unauthorized funds from customers.

The plaintiffs allege CenturyLink bills the customers relatively small amounts and provides only a limited time to seek refunds.

“This type of catch-us-if-you-can policy is unfair, deceptive and misleading,” the CenturyLink class action lawsuit states.

The CenturyLink class action lawsuit asserts violations of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, accounting and unjust enrichment. The plaintiffs are seeking actual damages, statutory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and other relief the court deems proper.

The CenturyLink deceptive billing practices class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of the plaintiffs and a proposed Class of Florida customers who contracted with CenturyLink for telephone, television and/or internet services during the applicable statute of limitations period.

Since the CenturyLink whistleblower complaint was lodged, several plaintiffs have filed CenturyLink class action lawsuits challenging the company’s allegedly deceptive billing practices. At least three CenturyLink class action lawsuits are currently pending in California, Oregon and Washington federal courts.

The plaintiffs are represented by Mark M. O’Mara and Alyssa J. Flood of O’Mara Law Group; Mark J. Geragos and Ben J. Meiselas of Geragos & Geragos PC; and Hart L. Robinovitch, Brian C. Gudmundson and Carolyn G. Anderson of Zimmerman Reed LLP.

The CenturyLink Deceptive Billing Practices Class Action Lawsuit is Francisco J. Carillo, et al. v. CenturyLink Inc., et al., Case No. 6:17-cv-01309-CEM-KRS, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division.

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


 

15 thoughts onCenturyLink Class Action Challenges ‘Catch-Us-If-You-Can’ Billing Practices

  1. Pamela E Pryor says:

    My quote wat $120 for my bundle. Direct TV, with Century Link. Never got it. My first bill was more than the agreement. C.L. told me to call D.TV, and D.TV told me to call C.L. I never got the bundle an I spent hours on the phone with different agents and managers. I was close to tears. Nobody knew about the bundle.

  2. Susan says:

    Nevada too. They’re ruining my mom’s credit score because they sent her unpaid, early termination fee of $200 to collection. My mom is trying to reverse her reverse mortgage but once they see that her once perfect credit score has been reduced, she’s going to have a much harder time, and higher interest rate with regard to her mortgage. How can a early termination fee be applied for services that weren’t bound by a contract?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.