Ashley Milano  |  August 18, 2016

Category: Labor & Employment

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

cvs class action price gouging lawsuitA new proposed class action lawsuit has been filed against CVS in California Superior Court alleging the pharmacy chain required pharmacists to participate in unpaid training.

The CVS unpaid training class action lawsuit, brought by Plaintiff Sevag Chalian, claims that non-exempt pharmacists were forced to perform training modules during their time off and for which they were not compensated.

Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that CVS paid pharmacists according to how long the company estimated the training would take instead of how long the unpaid training actually took.

“Plaintiff and class members would not receive the full compensation that they were due, whether at their regular rate of pay or their overtime rate of pay, as applicable, for the actual time that they spent completing these mandatory training modules for CVS,” the complaint said.

CVS Unpaid Training Allegations

Chalian filed the complaint on behalf of pharmacists who worked in CVS Region 65 and CVS Region 72 in California since July 20, 2012.

According to the proposed class action lawsuit, CVS mandated all pharmacists to complete these training modules as part of the requirement of employment and the training was not relevant to any state or board certification or licensure.

Additionally, the pharmacists were encouraged to complete the unpaid training modules during their breaks or remotely from home.

Chalian seeks to certify a class of California pharmacists working for CVS who were not properly compensated regular overtime hours associated with the unpaid training.

CVS is no stranger to class action lawsuits. Earlier this year, the pharmacy chain settled three consolidated lawsuits in California federal court.  This settlement also involved pharmacists who claimed they were not paid overtime when they worked more than six consecutive days.

Similarly, in 2013, California pharmacists filed a lawsuit against CVS Caremark Corp., alleging the pharmacy chain forced them to work overtime and off the clock to fill customer prescriptions.  This lawsuit was dismissed by the Ninth Circuit in January.

CA Labor Laws and Unpaid Training Hours

In California, employers that require employees to attend mandatory training programs must pay for this time, mandatory being the key word. The only time employers can get away with unpaid training is when all four of the following statements can be applied to the training:

  • The training is outside normal working hours.
  • The training is voluntary.
  • No other work is being performed by the employee during training time.
  • The training is not job related.

In other words, if a training is required — or even requested — by an employer, the time spent becomes “work time.” Employees must be compensated for all work time.

If your employer refuses to pay, or says the training does not qualify as mandatory, and you feel your rights under the FLSA have been violated, contact an experienced employment attorney for a free case evaluation or to learn more about your rights regarding unpaid training.

The CVS Pharmacist Unpaid Training Class Action Lawsuit is Chalian v. CVS Pharmacy Inc. et.al., Case No. BC627757, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles.

Join a Free California Overtime, Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you were forced to work off the clock or without overtime pay in California within the past 2 to 3 years, you have rights – and you don’t have to take on the company alone.

Get a Free Case Evaluation Now

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Get Help – It’s Free

Join a Free California Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you were denied overtime, breaks, or minimum wage by your employer in California, you may have a legal claim. Fill out the form below for more information.

An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case.

Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.

E-mail any problems with this form to:
Questions@TopClassActions.com.

  • The law firm responsible for the content of this page is:
    The Kick Law Firm, APC
    310-395-2988
    kicklawfirm.com
  • We tell you about cash you can claim every week! Subscribe to our free newsletter today.
    The attorney in charge of this advertisement is T.Kick of The Kick Law Firm, APC.
    By checking this box, I consent to receive from Top Class Actions marketing emails and/or marketing calls or text messages sent by an automatic telephone dialing system. I consent to Top Class Actions providing my phone number and email address to the lawyers or their agents sponsoring this investigation, and their co-counsel, if any, and I consent to receive marketing calls, text messages, and/or emails from those lawyers or their agents. I understand that this authorization overrides any previous registrations on a federal or state Do Not Call registry. You may opt out at any time. You can review Top Class Actions' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy here.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Top Class Actions does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network, nor does it analyze a person’s legal situation when determining which participating lawyers receive a person’s inquiry. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Top Class Actions does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. Do not use the form to submit confidential, time-sensitive, or privileged information. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys.

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.