Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Bud-Light-LimeOn appeal to the federal Ninth Circuit, a group of consumers are trying to revive claims that Bud Light Lime-A-Rita and similar drinks are deceptively labeled.

Plaintiffs Sheila Cruz, Deborah Esparza and Catherine Silas are appealing the dismissal of their false advertising class action lawsuit, alleging the use of the word “Light” on the labels of defendant Anheuser-Busch’s ‘Rita line of drinks constitutes deceptive advertising. The trial court dismissed the Bud Light lawsuit in June 2015 for failure to state a claim.

On appeal, Anheuser-Busch says the labels for Bud Light Lime-A-Rita were approved by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau before those labels were ever used on a marketed product. The company argues that agency approval gives it a “safe harbor” from legal action challenging the content of the label.

The company also cites a Frequently Asked Questions list on the Bureau’s website that purports to explain the provisions of Ruling 2004-1, a formal agency rule that governs use of the word “Light” in labeling. Anheuser-Busch says this FAQ specifically permits it to use the word “Light” on the packaging of its Bud Light Lime-A-Rita products.

The plaintiffs rebut that Anheuser-Busch did not rely on an actual agency rule but merely on an FAQ on an agency website – and that reliance on an FAQ is hardly enough to shield Anheuser-Busch from liability. They say that according to the actual language of Ruling 2004-1, a food label may use the word “Light” only if it’s accompanied by a “statement of average analysis” that lays out the calorie, carbohydrate, protein and fat content per container or per serving.

Cruz filed this class action lawsuit in 2014 and was later joined by plaintiffs Esparza and Silas. Cruz said she bought Bud Light Lime-A-Rita in reliance on its labeling as a Bud Light or Bud Light Lime product, understanding that meant the drink would be low in calories and carbohydrates.

After purchasing the product, Cruz says she discovered that Bud Light Lime-A-Ritas had 192 to 220 calories per eight-ounce serving – compared to 145 calories for a full 12-ounce Budweiser, and only 110 calories for a 12-ounce Bud Light.

Given such a disparity, the plaintiffs argued that the word “Light” on the labeling for Bud Light Lime-A-Rita amounts to misbranding and false advertising. They claim that Lime-A-Ritas, far from being “Light” in any sense, are in fact the highest-calorie alcoholic beverage that Anheuser-Busch sells.

Anheuser-Busch introduced its ‘Rita line of drinks in 2012 with Bud Light Lime-A-Ritas, raking in $62 million in sales that year. Since then, the line has been joined by Apple-Ahh-Rita, Raz-Ber-Rita, Straw-Ber-Rita, and most recently Cran-Brrr-Rita.

If their appeal is successful, the plaintiffs hope to represent a nationwide Class consisting of anyone who purchased Anheuser-Busch’s Bud Light Lime-A-Rita products in the four years leading up to the filing of their class action lawsuit. They also propose to represent a subclass of such persons who live in California.

On appeal, the plaintiffs are represented by Jason Lee, Caleb Marker and Christopher P. Ridout of Zimmerman Reed LLP, and by Kevin Mahoney of the Mahoney Law Group APC.

The Bud Light Lime-A-Rita False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit is Cruz v. Anheuser-Busch LLC, Case No. 15-56021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

UPDATE: On Feb. 7, 2017, a plaintiff representing a proposed Class of Bud Light Lime-A-Rita drinkers asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to revive a class action lawsuit alleging Anheuser-Busch LLC dupes consumers into thinking the beverage is low-calorie even though it is loaded with sugar.

Check out other class action lawsuits and class action settlements you can join!

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

4 thoughts onBud Light Lime-A-Rita Is Not ‘Light,’ Plaintiffs Tell 9th Circuit

  1. VANESSA BENNETT says:

    Add me to the list please

  2. Nikkia Childs says:

    Add me

  3. LaTonya says:

    Add me to the list please

  4. Top Class Actions says:

    UPDATE: On Feb. 7, 2017, a plaintiff representing a proposed Class of Bud Light Lime-A-Rita drinkers asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to revive a class action lawsuit alleging Anheuser-Busch LLC dupes consumers into thinking the beverage is low-calorie even though it is loaded with sugar.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.