Anne Bucher  |  April 25, 2014

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Chase Circuit City credit card fee settlementOn Wednesday, Chase Bank USA NA agreed to pay $5.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit that accused the company of luring consumers into obtaining “interest-free” Circuit City credit cards and then imposing unexpected fees and interest charges on their accounts.

The class action lawsuit, which was filed in 2006 by plaintiff Gary Davis, alleged that Chase improperly applied its customers’ payments to regular balance purchases before promotional purchases made at Circuit City, causing the customers to be wrongly assessed finance charges on the purchases. Davis alleged that Chase engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices by misrepresenting the promotional purchase program and misallocating the payments made by Chase customers who participated in the program.

According to the class action lawsuit, Davis purchased a $2,000 television from Circuit City on March 3, 2006 under a promotional offer. Under the terms of the promotional offer, no interest or payments were due until January 2008. Davis subsequently made a payment to cover his preexisting February balance. However, Chase applied his entire payment toward the television purchase, despite the promotional interest and payment-free grace period. As a result, there were insufficient funds to cover his February statement balance and Davis was assessed a $77.25 finance charge.

The class action lawsuit was stayed for about 20 months pending an appeal of the court’s determination that Chase’s class action waiver and arbitration provisions in its cardmember agreements were unenforceable under California law. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision. Claims against Circuit City were later withdrawn due to the company’s bankruptcy.

Davis filed his motion requesting approval of the class action settlement on Wednesday in California federal court. “This Settlement is the result of an eight year litigation odyssey involving extensive investigation, analysis and discovery, multiple and complex motion work, three formal mediation sessions, and hard fought negotiations by experienced arm’s length counsel,” the motion states. “The Settlement provides real, tangible and immediate relief to consumers without any further costs or delay.” The proposed class action settlement, if approved, would distribute approximately $10 to each Class Member.

According to the court documents, Settlement Class Members include all Chase Circuit City Rewards credit card members with California billing addresses who, between May 26, 2004 and the date of the preliminary approval of the class action settlement, made a promotional or deferred-interest purchase at Circuit City and who, as a result of payments or credits being allocated to a regular purchase balance after the promotional or deferred-interest balance, paid more in finance charges than they would have paid if the payments or credits had first been applied to the regular purchase balance.

Plaintiff Gary Davis is represented by Drew E. Pomerance, Burton E. Falk and David R. Ginsburg of Roxborough Pomerance Nye & Adreani LLP; Jeff Westerman and Jordanna Thigpen of Westerman Law Corp.; and Nichole Duckette Fricke of Milberg LLP.

The Circuit City Credit Card Fee Class Action Lawsuit is Gary Davis v. Chase Bank USA NA, et al., Case No. 2:06-cv-04804, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


2 thoughts onChase Agrees to $5.5M Circuit City Credit Card Class Action Settlement

  1. Steven R. Smith says:

    I too, was a member of this class action lawsuit but never received anything. The only people who get any award of any value are the attorney’s who bring on the class action suit. I get they need to cover their costs and time, etc. but it’s hardly worth those of us who were actually harmed and end up getting less than what we overpaid or what our actual damages were/are.

  2. Peter V. Macias says:

    I was a circuit city rewards card holder for along time untill they closed.I shopped at the torrance store
    then I changed to the Long Beach store.
    PETER V. MACIAS,1917 S.GRAND AVE. SAN PEDRO CA 90731

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.