Anne Bucher  |  March 27, 2014

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Google search data class action lawsuitA California federal judge has preliminarily approved an $8.5 million class action settlement that would resolve allegations that Google Inc. illegally divulged users’ search data to third parties.

The class action settlement will resolve allegations that Google’s search engine operated in such a way that violated Google users’ Internet privacy rights by disclosing personal information to third parties. The search engine allegedly included users’ search terms in the URL of the search results page, enabling third party website owners to receive the search terms any time a Google user clicked on a link to their website from the search results page. The plaintiffs claim that users’ search terms can contain personal information, such as names, addresses and Social Security numbers, that could increase the risk of identity theft.

U.S. District Judge Edward J. Davila granted preliminary approval to the Google privacy settlement and conditionally certified a potential class of more than 100 million Google search users. He approved the class action settlement despite concerns that the agreement would not provide direct monetary relief to consumers, would benefit inappropriate cy pres recipients, and did not require Google to make substantive changes to its business practices.

Under the terms of the class action settlement, Google would pay millions of dollars to Internet privacy groups and nonprofit organizations, including Stanford Law’s Center for Internet and Society; Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society; World Privacy Forum; Carnegie-Mellon; Chicago-Kent College of Law Center for Information, Society and Policy; and AARP Inc.

Privacy advocates expressed concern that these cy pres recipients would not further Class Members’ privacy interests. However, Judge Davila disagreed, finding that the plaintiffs had sufficiently demonstrated the organizations’ would further their interests. “All of the cy pres recipients were chosen only after they met certain qualifying criteria tailored to the claims in this case and submitted detailed proposals aimed at resolving issues in the area of Internet privacy,” he wrote. He found that the proposed cy pres distribution was sufficiently related to the Class Members’ interests as to justify preliminary approval of the class action settlement.

Although Judge Davila found that the class action settlement terms were reached after much deliberation and with the assistance of an experienced mediator, he acknowledged that “there are certain aspects of the settlement which could weigh against a finding of fairness.” Significantly, Google’s practices will not be changed as a result of the settlement. However, Google will be required to make disclosures that inform users in advance about how their search terms might be provided to third parties.

“Considering all of the circumstances which led to a compromise here, the relief obtained for the class does fall within a reasonable range of possible settlements since it was entirely possible that nothing would be obtained if the case were dismissed or if Defendant received a favorable verdict at trial – two entirely possible scenarios that would have allowed Defendant to continue its practice without further comment,” the judge wrote. “Under this settlement, that result is avoided by providing a means for future users of Defendant’s website to know the disclosure practices before conducting a search.”

The plaintiffs are represented by Kassra P. Nassiri of Nassiri & Jung LLP and Michael J. Aschenbrener of Aschenbrener Law PC.

The Google Search Data Class Action Lawsuit is In re: Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation, Case No. 5:10-cv-04089, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


9 thoughts on$8.5M Google Search Data Class Action Settlement Gets Preliminary OK

  1. danny@truthapedia.com says:

    Google was reported hacked and stolen in March 1996 to the LAPD, Los Angeles by the real inventor while a student at Santa Monica College. :(

  2. linda gelz says:

    very angry and..concerned undoubtedly that companies like Google have no qualms with putting our private information out there for anyone to scam! Sign me up… law action most certainly. I am a retired criminal law paralegal

  3. charles toponce says:

    i have had google for a long time an is getting worse about third party adds i need in on this how do i get in on this

  4. Sharon Nelson says:

    Figures! Millions to be paid to internet privacy groups and non-profits! UGH

  5. GARY SHAMBLEN says:

    Just took a look at all the undesirable email in my computer that I clean out periodically. Google is my primary search engine. I have received messages soliciting me for everything from quick loans, political contributions, hookups, sexual stimulants, books and about anything imaginable that brings monetary reward. I certainly didn’t sign up for this trash. I believe the responsible entity for my personal information being compromised owes me a settlement.

  6. Tnovak says:

    It isn’t that google is giving out email addresses, it is the suggested URL’s that are recorded from your searches. example. if you google, wedding dresses, that information is tracked and that is privacy violation. So everytime you go on the interent if will give you wedding information and on facebook and anyother site you visit. Even if your google sandpaper wedding information will be shown. Google has now on their settings page a box to check so you can’t be tracked. so everything you google everyday is tracked and then adverstisements for those items/products appear.

  7. Marcy Cosa says:

    I need to be included in on this. I used google as my default search engine and got a lot of junk mail.

  8. Debbie C. says:

    I’ve long since suspected Google was the culprit, and though I try to avoid Google searches (Bing is now my default search engine), the company owns so many products that I use (Blogger, YouTube, etc.). I once searched “diabetic recipes,” and was soon inundated with Diabetes-related emails and paper mailings! I am avoilding gmail at all costs!

    1. Tyler says:

      that wouldn’t have been the reason for your emails. you received them because you must have entered your email address in one of the websites you visited. either to sign-up to their forums, or mailing list perhaps? I use Google as my only search engine -have for many years now, and have only use one Gmail account. after using the internet about 12 hours daily and having to use a search engine repeatedly during that time (Google), I’ve yet to receive one piece of unsolicited email. It possible that you may have a misunderstanding to the details in this case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.