Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Uber Contractor Misclassification Lawsuit Overview:
- Who: Uber drivers fighting in a class action lawsuit to be classified as employees instead of contractors will have to arbitrate their claims out of court.
- Why: A federal judge ruled the drivers do not fit the interstate commerce transportation exemption under the Federal Arbitration Act
- Where: The lawsuit was playing out in federal court in New York before plaintiffs were ordered to arbitration.
In another decision against drivers fighting to get employment status from Uber, a New York federal judge has ruled that Uber drivers must arbitrate their claims out of court.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Valerie E. Caproni sided with Uber by sending a class action lawsuit filed by Plaintiffs Sancak Davarci and Joseph Chambers to arbitration, instead of allowing it to be heard in court.
The two drivers were trying to get their case to go to trial, arguing that Uber has misclassified them as independent contractors rather than employees, thus dodging paying all sorts of required benefits like a minimum wage and the right to unionize.
Caproni’s ruling Friday came due to the fact the judge ruled the drivers do not fit the interstate commerce transportation exemption from arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act because they don’t typically do interstate work, Law360 reports.
Through providing data showing most Uber drivers work within state, the ride-hailing giant managed to convince a judge to force the drivers into arbitration.
A nationwide battle is raging over whether Uber and Lyft can continue to classify their drivers as independent contractors. Also on Friday, a California court ruled that Prop 22, a ballot measure that exempted gig workers from state labor law, was unconstitutional.
And in a recent ruling on a case filed by Massachusetts Uber drivers, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said that Uber drivers’ pay and other claims will need to be worked out on an individual basis through arbitration and not a class action proceeding.
In that case, in 2019, Uber and Lyft were hit with twin lawsuits in federal court seeking employment status for Massachusetts drivers along with sick pay and other benefits. The class action lawsuit lodged against Uber was transferred to California federal court.
In 2020, Uber drivers submitted affidavits stating that, by failing to classify them as employees, the company forced them to work during the coronavirus pandemic — even if they were symptomatic.
The Uber driver pay class action lawsuit was tossed to arbitration by a California federal judge in May 2020, despite claims that the drivers were exempt. The drivers appealed, but a recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit will likely see them out of the courtroom for the time being.
Arbitration is different from a class action lawsuit, which takes place in court. Instead, arbitration is a private process that forces individual rather than group claims, according to the American Bar Association.
While a supposedly “neutral” arbitrator oversees the process, consumer advocates worry that powerful corporations, such as Uber, have the upper hand against individuals, such as their drivers, although Amazon made waves when it axed its arbitration clause recently.
Meanwhile, as the use of delivery services skyrocketed during the pandemic, ride hailing and delivery drivers have mounted class action lawsuits involving DoorDash and Amazon alleging the companies purposefully misclassify workers as independent contractors to avoid paying minimum wage, sick benefits, and overtime.
Do you work for a ride hailing service? What do you think of the Uber drivers pay class action lawsuit? Tell us about it in the comment section below!
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- Former VP at Tech Company Xilinx Fired for Pursuing Equal Pay for Women, Class Action Alleges
- 90+ Orgs Ask Apple to Abandon New iOS Update With Parent Notification Tool
- Postal Fleet Services Underpaid Truck Drivers, Stiffed Them of Final Pay, Class Action Alleges
- Home Health Care Workers Have Class Action Lawsuit Against Employer Certified
4 thoughts onUber Gets Another Win in Court, Forcing More Drivers Into Arbitration
Just started driving for them in November 2021 and so far it’s shady. They can’t even give you an exact amount for a ride before you accept it when the customer has already payed a fixed amount. They give you an amount $4-$10 for example and always give you the lowest amount possible. Now they want me to agree to their arbitration policy before I could start driving again. Drive 10-12 hours a day and get only about $140–$200 if I’m lucky that’s not including what I spend on gas or car washes, maintenance, car wear and tear, and miles put in the car. Not worth it. UBER DOES KEEP MOST THE MONEY and clean their hands on everything else.
I drive for them they make all the money not the driver Add me
Please add me
Add me plese