Steven Cohen  |  October 28, 2019

Category: Legal News

star trek video gameA class action lawsuit has been waged against Scopely Inc. by users claiming that the online video game company decreased the value of virtual goods purchased on the video game Star Trek Fleet Command (STFC).

Plaintiff Vernon Ackies says that he purchased virtual goods on the Star Trek video game and found out that Scopely decreased the value and the effectiveness of the goods after he bought them.

“Simply stated, Scopely took advantage of, and defrauded, its players through numerous unconscionable commercial practices and fraudulent acts to extract as much money as possible from them,” the Star Trek video game class action lawsuit notes.

The plaintiff states that Star Trek Fleet Command is a multiplayer online game, or “MMO,” which allows players to participate at the same time over the internet. STFC is free to play, but players can buy virtual goods with real money to enhance their abilities compared to other players on the game.

The Star Trek Fleet Command class action states that, for as high as $99.99 players can purchase “resources,” “materials,” “character cards,” “faction credits,” and “ship blueprints.” In addition, the plaintiff notes that game players can purchase “packs,” like “Master Station Upgrade Pack” and “Ultra Ship Power Pack,” which encompass tokens which are used to upgrade a player’s character, space station or space ship.

“Making upgrades to a player’s space station and space ship through the purchase of virtual goods is an important function in STFC. Without making these upgrades, which cost real money, competitive players are unable to advance far in STFC and are easily defeated by other players who have made such purchases and upgrades,” the Scopely class action lawsuit states.

In addition, the plaintiff claims that the defendant represents the importance of upgrading a player’s space station and space ship.

The Scopely class action lawsuit alleges that STFC misrepresents to players the cost of Star Trek Fleet Command’s virtual goods. The plaintiff claims that STFC subtracted more in-game currencies from a player’s balance than the stated cost prior to purchase.

The plaintiff also claims that players pay for virtual goods that had stated benefits and capabilities at the time of the purchase, but that the players did not get those benefits and capabilities that they paid for.

The Star Trek Fleet Command class action lawsuit also claims that in February 2019, after complaints from STFC players, Scopely released an “update” to the game, which was supposed to fix parts of the software that was causing issues.

The plaintiff claims that these updates made changes to the “rules” of STFC, which had an effect on the “in-game economy and cost structure.”

“The February 2019 update, as well as a series of subsequent updates, substantially changed the rules of STFC and the in-game economy, effectively devaluing all prior purchases made by paying players,” the Scopely class action lawsuit alleges.

The plaintiff also alleges that Scopely makes it hard for Star Trek Fleet Command players to file complaints and refuses to issue refunds to players who have lost purchased virtual goods bought with real-world money.

“Refunds are not issued even if the virtual good was lost through no fault of the player…or if a virtual good does not operate as represented,” the Scopely class action lawsuit states.

The plaintiff has filed this action under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion, unjust enrichment, and legal fraud.

Did you purchase virtual goods while playing Star Trek Fleet Command? Leave a message in the comments section below.

The plaintiff is represented by Bob Kasolas and Mark E. Critchley of Brach Eichler LLC.

The Scopely Star Trek Fleet Command In Game Purchase Class Action Lawsuit is Ackies v. Scopely, Inc. Case No. 2:19-cv-19247, in the U.S. District Court of New Jersey.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


513 thoughts onStar Trek Fleet Command Players Lose Virtual Goods, Class Action Says

  1. Mike S says:

    I have experienced the same as rest. Have chatted with cs many times demanding to be made whole. Nothing passed standard robot answers.

  2. Curtis says:

    The developer is most certainly not interested in game quality as evidenced by the bugged content. It does not deviate from pay-to-play paradigm. I hope the class action prevails personally.

  3. Noel McCafferty says:

    Why is paramount allowing scopely to use the Star Trek name as far as I can see it has no relevance to the franchise what so ever it’s a money making racket

  4. Ron says:

    Pixonic does the same!

  5. Matt says:

    Same as all the rest.

  6. Joel Chinn says:

    I have another case of fraud concerning Scopely. They hold special Events to gain various goods but do not tell the players the minimum required Levels of play, power or abilities to participate. After any player purchases a minimum entrance fee they are faced with missions they cannot possibly do. Most players who buy, loose because they are not warned about the necessary levels required to participate. I know many cases of this happening

  7. James Mathias says:

    Yes. Money spent. Disappointment earned!

  8. Romulan Spy says:

    I know this is somewhat unrelated to this article, but…

    I’m still waiting to hear if anybody’s sued Cryptic and/or CBS for keeping the T6 Constitution behind a massive paywall and/or incredibly-rare lockboxes. That ship should have been available from the Ship Requisition shop since the beginning.

    If somebody’s taken the initiative to sue Scopely for this issue, why can’t someone also sue Cryptic/CBS and give us fans something we’ve been wanting for years?

  9. Erik Jackson says:

    When you pay for something you have an expectation of getting what you paid for. This is simply business 101 and this company has failed many times.

  10. Phil Edelstein says:

    Yes, I’ve spent plenty on this game. Too much to mention.

1 31 32 33 34 35 47

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.