Steven Cohen  |  October 28, 2019

Category: Legal News

star trek video gameA class action lawsuit has been waged against Scopely Inc. by users claiming that the online video game company decreased the value of virtual goods purchased on the video game Star Trek Fleet Command (STFC).

Plaintiff Vernon Ackies says that he purchased virtual goods on the Star Trek video game and found out that Scopely decreased the value and the effectiveness of the goods after he bought them.

“Simply stated, Scopely took advantage of, and defrauded, its players through numerous unconscionable commercial practices and fraudulent acts to extract as much money as possible from them,” the Star Trek video game class action lawsuit notes.

The plaintiff states that Star Trek Fleet Command is a multiplayer online game, or “MMO,” which allows players to participate at the same time over the internet. STFC is free to play, but players can buy virtual goods with real money to enhance their abilities compared to other players on the game.

The Star Trek Fleet Command class action states that, for as high as $99.99 players can purchase “resources,” “materials,” “character cards,” “faction credits,” and “ship blueprints.” In addition, the plaintiff notes that game players can purchase “packs,” like “Master Station Upgrade Pack” and “Ultra Ship Power Pack,” which encompass tokens which are used to upgrade a player’s character, space station or space ship.

“Making upgrades to a player’s space station and space ship through the purchase of virtual goods is an important function in STFC. Without making these upgrades, which cost real money, competitive players are unable to advance far in STFC and are easily defeated by other players who have made such purchases and upgrades,” the Scopely class action lawsuit states.

In addition, the plaintiff claims that the defendant represents the importance of upgrading a player’s space station and space ship.

The Scopely class action lawsuit alleges that STFC misrepresents to players the cost of Star Trek Fleet Command’s virtual goods. The plaintiff claims that STFC subtracted more in-game currencies from a player’s balance than the stated cost prior to purchase.

The plaintiff also claims that players pay for virtual goods that had stated benefits and capabilities at the time of the purchase, but that the players did not get those benefits and capabilities that they paid for.

The Star Trek Fleet Command class action lawsuit also claims that in February 2019, after complaints from STFC players, Scopely released an “update” to the game, which was supposed to fix parts of the software that was causing issues.

The plaintiff claims that these updates made changes to the “rules” of STFC, which had an effect on the “in-game economy and cost structure.”

“The February 2019 update, as well as a series of subsequent updates, substantially changed the rules of STFC and the in-game economy, effectively devaluing all prior purchases made by paying players,” the Scopely class action lawsuit alleges.

The plaintiff also alleges that Scopely makes it hard for Star Trek Fleet Command players to file complaints and refuses to issue refunds to players who have lost purchased virtual goods bought with real-world money.

“Refunds are not issued even if the virtual good was lost through no fault of the player…or if a virtual good does not operate as represented,” the Scopely class action lawsuit states.

The plaintiff has filed this action under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion, unjust enrichment, and legal fraud.

Did you purchase virtual goods while playing Star Trek Fleet Command? Leave a message in the comments section below.

The plaintiff is represented by Bob Kasolas and Mark E. Critchley of Brach Eichler LLC.

The Scopely Star Trek Fleet Command In Game Purchase Class Action Lawsuit is Ackies v. Scopely, Inc. Case No. 2:19-cv-19247, in the U.S. District Court of New Jersey.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


513 thoughts onStar Trek Fleet Command Players Lose Virtual Goods, Class Action Says

  1. Ryan hart says:

    This game has ripped me off several times.. I shield then come back and have nothing.. Put in complaints and all they say is it seems its working fine on our end

  2. Eric Omalley says:

    I lost about 600$ usd yo this money pit the prime packs i bought were also misrepresented

  3. Larry Coughran says:

    I have watched the amount of resources needed to upgrade change after purchase, leaving me just short of the anticipated results.

    I have also seen them increase the amount of resources needed to upgrade an item after you level up.

    They also manipulate the 99.99 packs to the individual user to try and force a multi-buy.

  4. Stephen says:

    As an STFC player also affected by this,

    Many goods and services offered were initially described as 100% bonus to damage, armor, shield deflection, hull health, dodge, shield etc which were only obtainable by spending real money but when purchased, the math didn’t add up.

    On raising the issues with Scopely, they clarified this by saying it was 100% of the base attribute and was in addition to the modified attribute through various research and upgrades, which realistically, only yielded a net gain of approximately 5-25% to the completely researched and upgraded attribute.

    The goods offered were therefore misrepresented based on their descriptions at the time of their initial purchasing some months ago and whilst no reimbursements have been issued for the said misrepresentations, the in-game descriptions were later changed to correctly represent the statement by Scopely, but without knowing what the base attributes are, there is no real way to actually confirm if you are getting what they are saying you are getting.

    One could argue that if the goods were correctly described in the first place, the likelihood that an individual would spend 100USD for a 5%-25% bonus to a single attribute would be significantly less but would most probably value that bonus at a more reasonable 20 USD.

  5. John Hunt says:

    Gett8ng tired of seeing acopley trying to ripped us off with so called high price most of them are nit worth a shit its another gimmick to rip everyone off without fixing the damn glitch scopley owes us alot of apologies and they should bring the price back all the way down since they cant fix shits.

  6. Josh says:

    Many have lost a lot of money on it. It continues to happen as new updates devalue previous purchases. I’ve spent nearly $15,000 and others have spent upwards of $60k

  7. Sean Gibbons says:

    I have purchased several packs and upgrades, and do not believe it has given me any advantage, whatsoever.

  8. Bob Joshua says:

    Spent well over $450.00 in this game. They charge way too much for items.

  9. Nathaniel velez says:

    Ya, I noticed after purchasing the prime packs, they had very little to no effect, and the stated boost was not seen. I think this lawsuit is valid and I wish I started it.

  10. Dan tompkins says:

    I lost a quite a sum on this game. At least $400 for not a lot of upgrades and still get clobbered. Not worth the cost.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.