Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

facetime app on iphoneApple is facing a class action lawsuit filed by iPhone 4/4S users who claim that the company broke FaceTime for iOS 6 and earlier operating systems in April 2014.

Plaintiff Austin Belanger claims that there are two methods that users can utilize FaceTime. One is called the “peer to peer” method in which there is a direct connection between the parties and the other is a “relay method” where the parties connect to a server that “relays” the data on behalf of the parties.  

After the release of iOS 7, users of FaceTime moved from the “relay” system to the “peer to peer” system, which was more cost effective to Apple, the plaintiff says. However, users of iOS 6 and earlier still had to utilize the “relay” system to make and receive FaceTime calls.

The Apple class action lawsuit states that, soon after, Apple shut off the capability for iPhone users with iOS 6 and earlier to access FaceTime and that, in order to use the service, those users would have to upgrade to iOS 7.

The FaceTime class action lawsuit further claims that Apple turned off the “relay” method knowing that it would have an affect on millions of users, because moving to iOS 7 was not compatible with certain apple smartphones.

“For iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S users, for example, the coerced move to iOS 7 subjected their devices to slowness, system crashes, erratic behavior and/or the elimination of their ability to use critical functions on their phone,” the Apple class action lawsuit alleges.

The plaintiff states that the date that Apple turned off FaceTime for users with iOS 6 and earlier was set for April 16, 2014.  Thus, on that day, without warning from Apple, millions of users lost the ability to use FaceTime.

In point of fact, “Internal Apple emails eliminate any doubt that Apple intentionally broke FaceTime, and did so in order to reduce relay usage and the high costs related thereto,” the class action lawsuit claims.

The plaintiff alleges that after Apple broke FaceTime, the millions of iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S users whose smartphones were operating on iOS 6 or earlier had three options if they wanted to continue to use their device. They could continue using their phone without the ability to use FaceTime. Or, they could move to iOS 7 on their current device, which would have a significant effect on functionality, or buy a new Apple phone which could run iOS 7 and thus use FaceTime.

The Apple class action lawsuit states that an internal email from an Apple employee within hours of the FaceTime break sums up the problem: “our users on [iOS 6] and before are basically screwed,” the email states.

Putative Class Members include: “Consumers who, at the time of the April 16, 2014 FaceTime Break, owned an iPhone 4 or iPhone 4S that was running on iOS 6 or an earlier operating system, and who therefore lost the ability to use FaceTime on their devices.”

The plaintiff claims that Apple violated the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and alleges trespass to chattels.

Belanger is represented by Adam Moskowitz, Howard Bushman, Adam Schwartzbaum of The Moskowitz Law Firm.

The Apple FaceTime Class Action Lawsuit is Austin Belanger v. Apple Inc., Case No 1:19-cv-23623, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


27 thoughts oniPhone Class Action Says Apple Deliberately Broke FaceTime

  1. Michelle Gude-Bryant says:

    Please add

  2. Patrick Alwin Williams says:

    I unfortunately took the second option and messed up my iPhone because had upgraded to iOS7. I knew things were wrong and yet not the cause. Being a freelancer, my iPhone was critical in many areas of my life and yet the upgrades kept hurting my iPhones potential, people said to get newer phone but I didn’t have money for it nor the 5 hours to sit in line again like I did for my 4S even though had paid for it weeks earlier. The updates kept decreasing the battery which presented so many challenges with balancing my jobs and commutes. Knowing the FaceTime problem with IOS 7was handles this way is difficult to process, and yes they should face some time for this FaceTime bs.

  3. Darnell Ishmel says:

    Please add me I have purchased iPhones for myself my mother my nieces and others are this has happened repeatedly

  4. Brittany Pruitt says:

    Please add me. My husband, In-laws, 1 child and myself have all had to update each and every time they would release a newer model. And this has went on for almost a decade now with each and every phone purchased. Which is 10+ easily!

  5. TAMMY BURNS says:

    Add me

  6. Christy Abernathy says:

    Add me please

  7. Christy Abernathy says:

    Add me please.

  8. Diane Gipson says:

    Add me please

  9. Ella Bright says:

    Add me

  10. Michael Chrisman says:

    Please Add me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.