Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Google has been hit with another antitrust lawsuit, this time a class action lawsuit brought by a New York consumer suing over its Google Play app store.
Kondomar Herrera filed the class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Oct. 20 claiming the tech giant violated the federal Sherman Act by creating a monopoly in the Android mobile device app market. That monopoly has resulted in higher prices for apps that are lower quality and little if any recourse available to consumers, Herrera says.
The class action lawsuit was filed the same day the U.S. Department of Justice and 11 states leveled landmark antitrust charges against Google in federal court in Washington, D.C. In that case, the government is accusing Google of paying billions of dollars to smartphone companies to make Google the default search engine on their web browsers.
The practice limits competition and innovation by holding Google’s search engine rivals back, the justice department’s lawsuit claims.
Herrera’s claims about Google’s approach to capturing the lion’s share of the Android mobile app market are similar to the federal government’s claims about the search engine business.
According to the class action lawsuit, Google Play is the largest app store in the world — it is available to all users of smart phones and mobile devices built on an Android operating system. It offers more than 2.96 million applications and racked up in excess of 84.3 million downloads in 2019.
“To build this prodigious marketplace, Google represented that the Android OS would be maintained as ‘open’ source software whereby anyone could create Android-compatible products without undue restrictions,” the class action lawsuit says.
As Google Play grew in popularity and the Android operating system took over a larger market share, “Google began to close its ecosystem through a series of restrictive agreements that were designed to (and did in fact) deter and eliminate competition in the market for Android mobile apps and in-app products,” Herrera claims.
Google negotiates contracts with mobile device manufacturers to pre-install Google Play on their products and feature it on the home screens of phones and tablets, the Herrera class action claims. As a result, 90% of apps downloaded to Android-based devices are purchased from Google Play.
It also requires app developers to use “Google’s proprietary in-app billing for certain in-app purchases,” the class action lawsuit says, and it blocks apps “offered outside the Google Play Store from offering basic functions, such as automatic updating of apps in the background, which is available for apps downloaded from the Google Play Store.”
Herrera is suing, she said, because Google’s practices have resulted in consumers being charged “supracompetitive” prices for apps, 30% of which go directly to Google, helping it “generate more than $21.5 billion in ill-gotten revenue.”
Herrera’s class action lawsuit is the second filed against Google this month. Another plaintiff filed in the same federal court in California on Oct. 9 accusing the Google Play Store of the same legal violations as those alleged by Herrera: forcing anticompetitive contractual restrictions on app developers and charging consumers “supracompetitive” prices for apps.
“Google’s conduct has had no legitimate pro-competitive justification considering its anticompetitive effects, and therefore it has unreasonably restrained competition in the Android Mobile App Distribution Market,” the class action lawsuit claims.
Last year, the European Commission fined Google $1.7 billion over antitrust claims about its online advertising practices. In 2017, the commission hit the company with $5 billion in fines for unfair business practices related to the contracts it has with mobile device manufacturers to preload its apps.
Herrera is seeking to represent a class of consumers who, like herself, purchased apps through the Google Play app store, or made in-app purchases. Though the class action lawsuit does not estimate the number of eligible consumers, it predicts “there are, perhaps, tens of millions of geographically dispersed Class Members.”
Do you get your mobile apps from the Google Play app store? Do you think the apps have a higher price tag and lower quality than apps available through other platforms? Tell us about it in the comment section below.
Lead plaintiff Herrera and the proposed Class Members are represented by Laurence D. King, Mario M. Choi, Robert N. Kaplan, Hae Sung Nam, Frederic S. Fox, Donald R. Hall and Aaron L. Schwartz of Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.
The Google Search Class Action Lawsuit is Kondomar Herrera, et al. v. Google, LLC, Case No. 5:20-cv-07365, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
38 thoughts onAntitrust Class Action Lawsuit Says Google Play App Store Is a Monopoly
I am definitely needing to do something about this hopefully join your lawsuit it’s ridiculous they monopolize your phone bill your time burn your data up and making false statements that they will pay this that and the other they never do it is plainly they are lying to you and Google is allowing them to do this I have contacted Google I have contacted the Play store console and stuff why they allow business leading representation deceptive practices and everything else but they never respond to me I haven’t recorded I have screen recordings and screenshots to prove my whole experience with this one game in particular but they’re thousands of them that do this and this is not my first experience with this please definitely contact me I would I would love to help hold these people financially responsible
Google is the epitome of monopolization. I thought that was outlawed in the United States. I guess they’re following the scheme of car dealerships. Go figure
The auto-update feature is NOT a benefit; it’s a hazard, it’s dangerous, and a huge security risk. And no matter how many times you set the “Don’t auto-update,” and “Don’t auto-update apps,” after a day or two, the Play Store re-installs itself changing the settings back to the default auto-update, which is, in itself, a shady, dishonest practice. Sign me up. I’m so tired of the scandalous practices Google employs.
Please add me I have many issues with Google Play credit Google apps unfair charges that have never been reimbursed they claim that you get Google played credit points for in-app purchases but it still charges your account for those purchases and you never get reimbursed this has been going on for over 4 years thousands and thousands of dollars I have multiple games that I play Game of thrones which is a very expensive game that I currently quit due to the tremendous amount of manipulation behind these games. And we the people have no power direction our ability to be able to do anything about it I guarantee you I’ve lost probably five or six thousand dollars… It’s ridiculous that they can get away with what they get away with
Add me please
Please add me, I have been robbed for 1000s of dollars from faulty google play app games.
Please ad me In app purchase that dosnt match what it was advertised to and contacted Google all what I hwar from the is try to contact the app developer if we expect our partners respond within 3 business days
But nothing from bothe sides they said we will investigate but nothing my case got closed 4 times with gogle for no reason