Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals by consumers who claim that the company’s Coppertone sunscreens contain harmful ingredients that they pass off as mineral-based.
Plaintiff Steven Prescott states that he purchased Coppertone Sport Face Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion at a Rite Aid store in California for $8 in 2017.
He says that legitimate mineral-based sunscreens will contain up to 24 percent titanium dioxide or zinc oxide with no chemical ingredients. However, the Coppertone sport sunscreen reportedly contains 12 percent chemical active ingredients and only 9.7 percent mineral-based active ingredients.
Plaintiff Mike Xavier says he too bought the Coppertone Sports Face Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion and the Coppertone Kids Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion at a Target store in California and paid $8 on more than one occasion since 2017. According to the Coppertone class action, the kids sunscreen contains an equal amount of both chemical and mineral active ingredients.
The plaintiffs claim that the “Mineral-Based” products in question include: Coppertone Water Babies Mineral-Based Sunscreen Stick, Coppertone Water Babies Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion (in various sizes); Coppertone Kids Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion; and Coppertone Sport Face Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion.
“Contrary to their labeling, the purported mineral-based sunscreen Products contain chemical active ingredients. In fact, the Products often contain a larger percentage of chemical active ingredients than mineral active ingredients,” the Coppertone class action lawsuit states.
The plaintiffs state that sunscreen products are either chemical-based or mineral-based. They allege that chemical-based sunscreens contain Octisalate, Octocrylene, and Octinoxate, while mineral-based sunscreens use ingredients such as zinc oxide and/or titanium dioxide.
The Coppertone class action lawsuit claims that chemical active ingredients have been proven to have deleterious health effects such as endocrine disruption, skin irritation, and allergic reactions as the chemical active ingredients can be absorbed into the skin and could enter the bloodstream.
The plaintiffs also argue that Hawaii state lawmakers have banned two chemical sunscreen ingredients, Octinoxate and Oxybenzone.
“Consequently, because of concerns about chemical-based sunscreens, consumers have increasingly sought out mineral-based sunscreens, the sales of which have surged in recent years. This is particularly true among consumers of sunscreens intended for use on babies and children,” the Coppertone class action lawsuit states.
The plaintiffs claim that the defendants’ label states that their sunscreens are “Mineral-Based” and that the labels are “set against— and highlighted by—an eye-catching, polished-silver background or font color.”
In addition, the Coppertone class action states that a reasonable consumer would believe that the products only contain active mineral ingredients and not active synthetic chemical ingredients.
The plaintiffs say that in the Coppertone Water Babies Mineral-Based Sunscreen Stick Products and the Coppertone Sport Face Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion Products, the chemical active ingredients are made up of a larger percentage of the products than the mineral active ingredients.
“Labeling the Products as ‘Mineral-Based’ when they contain any chemical active ingredients is wholly misleading and deceptive. Worse, however, is Defendants’ practice of labeling the Products as ‘mineral-based’ where the percentage of mineral active ingredients is actually less than, or nearly equal to, the percentage of chemical active ingredients,” the Coppertone class action lawsuit states.
Do you use any mineral-based sunscreen products? Leave a message in the comments section below.
The plaintiffs are represented by Shireen M. Clarkson, Ryan J. Clarkson and Celine Cohan of Clarkson Law Firm PC and Christopher D. Moon and Kevin O. Moon of Moon Law APC.
The Coppertone Sunscreen Class Action Lawsuit is Prescott, et al. v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-00102, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
145 thoughts onCoppertone Class Action Says ‘Mineral-Based’ Labels Are Misleading
Please add me
Please add me
Used coppertone sport 100 and ended up with horrible hives all over my body. I then had to go to the ER and get 2 rounds of benadryl and cortisone.
add me please
Please add me, I purchase this to wear daily
I’ve purchase Coppertone products for years, I work out doors and have sensitive skin. I am disappointed in this product. Please add me to your list.
I have been buying this for years,esp for my kids to use during athletic events.. please add me
I use this regularlu please add me
Add me
add me